CELE Steel & Timber Design — Steel Beams: Flexure and ShearConcept Map
For visual learners attacking the CELE 2026, a Steel Beams: Flexure and Shear concept map is usually worth more than ten pages of linear notes. PRC builds many Steel Beams: Flexure and Shear items around the same handful of relationships — spot them on a map and you recognise them at a glance in the Steel & Timber Design paper.
Exam context
The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Steel & Timber Design subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Steel Beams: Flexure and Shear appears in position 3rd of 5 in the CELE Steel & Timber Design review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.
Steel Beams: Flexure and Shear - Concept Map
Central Concept
Steel Beam Design: Flexural and Shear Strength
Related Concepts
Concept
Flexural Strength (Bending Capacity)
Sub Concepts
- Plastic Moment Capacity
- Lateral-Torsional Buckling
- Unbraced Length Limits
- Section Compactness
- Moment Gradient Factor
Relationship To Central
Primary limit state; determines moment-carrying ability of beam
Concept
Shear Strength
Sub Concepts
- Web Shear Area
- Web Slenderness
- Shear Stress Distribution
- Resistance Factor
Relationship To Central
Secondary limit state; determines shear-carrying capacity of web
Concept
Section Classification
Sub Concepts
- Compact Sections
- Non-Compact Sections
- Slender Sections
- Width-to-Thickness Ratios
Relationship To Central
Governs which failure mode controls; affects design equations
Concept
Lateral Bracing
Sub Concepts
- Limit Length Lp
- Limit Length Lr
- Bracing Spacing
- Brace Stiffness Requirements
Relationship To Central
Critical design parameter; controls LTB and limits unbraced length
Concept
Material Properties
Sub Concepts
- Yield Strength Fy
- Modulus of Elasticity E
- Radius of Gyration ry
- Steel Grade (ASTM A36, A992)
Relationship To Central
Input parameters for all strength calculations
Concept
Design Equations & Factors
Sub Concepts
- Resistance Factors
- Safety Factors (ASD)
- Effective Length Factor
- Moment Coefficient Cb
Relationship To Central
Quantitative framework per AISC 360 and NSCP 2015
Concept Connections
To
Section Compactness
From
Plastic Moment Capacity
Strength
strong
Relationship
Plastic moment Mn = Mp × Fy × Zx is only achieved if the section is compact and can develop full inelastic strains without local buckling
To
Unbraced Length Limits
From
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
Strength
strong
Relationship
LTB occurs when unbraced length exceeds Lp; limit lengths Lp and Lr define the transition between full plasticity, inelastic, and elastic buckling
To
Lateral Bracing
From
Unbraced Length Limits
Strength
strong
Relationship
Braces placed at spacing ≤ Lp prevent LTB and allow full plastic moment; spacing must be calculated based on section properties and steel grade
To
Lateral-Torsional Buckling
From
Moment Gradient Factor
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Cb factor increases flexural strength when moment distribution is non-uniform; maximum value is capped at Mp to avoid unconservative results
To
Shear Strength
From
Web Shear Area
Strength
strong
Relationship
Shear capacity Vn = 0.6 × Fy × Aw; web area Aw = d × tw is the primary geometric parameter in shear resistance
To
Shear Strength
From
Web Slenderness
Strength
strong
Relationship
Web slenderness ratio h/tw determines the shear coefficient Cv; stocky webs (Cv = 1.0) are simpler; slender webs require iterative calculation
To
Plastic Moment Capacity
From
Material Properties
Strength
strong
Relationship
Yield strength Fy directly multiplies plastic modulus Zx; higher steel grade increases moment capacity proportionally
To
Unbraced Length Limits
From
Material Properties
Strength
strong
Relationship
Lp = 1.76 × ry × √(E/Fy) depends on yield strength, modulus, and section geometry; higher Fy increases LTB vulnerability
To
Flexural Strength
From
Resistance Factors
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Design strength φb × Mn (LRFD) or Mn/Ωb (ASD) applies safety factors per AISC 360 and NSCP 2015; φb = 0.90 for most cases
To
Shear Strength
From
Resistance Factors
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Design shear strength φv × Vn applies resistance factor; φv = 1.0 for rolled I-shapes, 0.90 for others
To
Flexural Strength
From
Section Classification
Strength
strong
Relationship
Compact sections reach Mp; non-compact sections have reduced capacity; slender sections may be governed by local buckling rather than flexure
To
Local Buckling
From
Flange Compactness
Strength
strong
Relationship
Flange width-to-thickness ratio λ = b/2tf; if λ > λp, flange may buckle locally, limiting stress to less than Fy
To
Local Buckling
From
Web Compactness
Strength
strong
Relationship
Web slenderness λ = h/tw; if λ > λp, web may buckle locally; if λ > λr, strength is significantly reduced
To
Shear Strength
From
Plastic Moment Capacity
Strength
weak
Relationship
In combined bending and shear, both limit states must be checked; shear rarely governs for rolled sections but becomes important near supports
To
Design Equations & Factors
From
AISC 360
Strength
strong
Relationship
AISC 360-16 (or latest) provides standard equations, resistance factors, and procedures for calculating flexural and shear strength of steel members
To
Design Equations & Factors
From
NSCP 2015
Strength
strong
Relationship
NSCP 2015 adopts AISC specifications for Philippine civil engineering practice; provides local design methodology and load factors
Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.