CELE Steel & Timber Design — Steel ConnectionsConcept Map
Concept maps are proven memory anchors for high-volume exams like CELE. This page maps out the key ideas of Steel Connections, the sub-topics that appear on CELE Steel & Timber Design papers, and the connections Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering frequently tests in mixed-concept questions.
Exam context
The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Steel & Timber Design subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Steel Connections appears in position 4th of 5 in the CELE Steel & Timber Design review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.
Steel Connections - Concept Map
Central Concept
Steel Connection Design & Failure Modes
Related Concepts
Concept
Bolted Connections
Sub Concepts
- Bolt Shear Strength
- Bearing Strength
- Slip-Critical Connections
- Bolt Tension
- Block Shear Rupture
- Double Shear vs Single Shear
Relationship To Central
Primary connection method; uses discrete fasteners to transfer force
Concept
Welded Connections
Sub Concepts
- Fillet Welds
- Groove Welds
- Weld Throat Area
- Electrode Classification
- Effective Weld Length
- Full Penetration Design
Relationship To Central
Alternative connection method; creates continuous force transfer
Concept
Limit States & Failure Modes
Sub Concepts
- Shear Rupture
- Bearing Deformation
- Tensile Rupture
- Block Shear Rupture
- Weld Throat Rupture
- Slip at Service Load
Relationship To Central
Governs design strength calculations; determines governing failure
Concept
Design Parameters
Sub Concepts
- Material Properties (Fy, Fu)
- Bolt Diameter & Area
- Plate Thickness
- Edge & Pitch Distances
- Electrode Strength (FEXX)
- Resistance Factor (phi = 0.75)
Relationship To Central
Input values required for strength calculations
Concept
LRFD Methodology
Sub Concepts
- Nominal Strength Calculation
- Resistance Factor Application
- Design Strength (phi*Rn)
- Service Load Checks
- Safety Margins
Relationship To Central
Load and Resistance Factor Design framework for connection design
Concept
Code Standards & References
Sub Concepts
- AISC 360-16 Specification
- NSCP 2015 Provisions
- ASTM A325 Bolt Standards
- Electrode Classifications
- RA 544 Building Code Requirements
Relationship To Central
Regulatory framework governing connection design in Philippines
Concept Connections
To
Double Shear vs Single Shear
From
Bolt Shear Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
Nominal shear strength doubles when there are two shear planes instead of one; design strength = 0.75 × Fnv × Ab × (number of shear planes)
To
Plate Thickness & Edge Distance
From
Bearing Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
Bearing capacity is directly proportional to both plate thickness (t) and edge/pitch distance (lc); larger distances increase bearing strength up to the 2.4db limit
To
Hole Diameter Cap
From
Bearing Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
The 2.4×db×t×Fu term caps bearing strength; even large edge distances cannot exceed this limit, controlling over-design
To
Leg Size
From
Fillet Weld Throat Area
Strength
strong
Relationship
Throat area = 0.707 × leg size (a); throat, not leg size, is used in strength calculations; common error is using leg size directly
To
Bearing Strength
From
Bolt Shear Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
Both limit states must be checked; connection design strength is the minimum of bolt shear and bearing, whichever is smaller
To
Angle & Gusset Connections
From
Block Shear Rupture
Strength
strong
Relationship
Block shear failure is particularly critical in angles bolted on one leg and gusset plates; must always be checked for these configurations
To
LRFD Resistance Factor phi = 0.75
From
Design Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
All connection limit states use φ = 0.75 in LRFD; design strength = φ × nominal strength; safety factor embedded in resistance factor
To
Material Properties (Fy, Fu)
From
Nominal Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
Nominal strength calculations depend on yield (Fy) for gross-section limits and ultimate (Fu) for net-section/rupture limits
To
A325-N vs A325-X
From
Bolt Shear Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
A325-N (threads in shear) has Fnv = 372 MPa; A325-X (threads excluded) has Fnv = 469 MPa; choice affects bolt shear capacity significantly
To
Electrode Type (E70, E80)
From
Fillet Weld Strength
Strength
strong
Relationship
Weld nominal strength proportional to electrode strength FEXX; E70 (482 MPa) is common, E80 (550 MPa) provides higher strength
To
Governing Limit State
From
Connection Design Process
Strength
strong
Relationship
All limit states must be calculated; the minimum controls connection capacity; common exam error is reporting bolt shear without checking bearing
To
Tension Path & Shear Path
From
Block Shear Rupture
Strength
strong
Relationship
Block shear combines a shear failure plane and a tension failure plane; the sum of these two rupture paths determines capacity
To
Fillet Weld Capacity
From
Weld Effective Length
Strength
strong
Relationship
Design strength proportional to effective length L; longer welds develop higher total strength; per-unit-length strength = 0.75 × 0.60 × FEXX × 0.707a
To
Friction & Clamping Force
From
Slip-Critical Connections
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Slip-critical bolts resist load via friction (μ) between clamped surfaces; required when slip cannot be tolerated (fatigue, dynamic loading)
To
Bearing & Block Shear Strength
From
Plate Thickness
Strength
strong
Relationship
Thicker plates improve both bearing strength (proportional to t) and block shear net area; minimum practical thickness often set by bearing or shear limits
To
Bolt Cross-Sectional Area
From
Bolt Diameter
Strength
strong
Relationship
Bolt shear strength proportional to Ab = π×db²/4; larger bolts significantly increase shear capacity but also affect bearing and hole dimensions
To
NSCP 2015 Adoption
From
AISC 360 Specification
Strength
strong
Relationship
NSCP 2015 in Philippines is based on AISC 360-16; formulas, resistance factors, and procedures are identical; RA 544 requires compliance
To
Bearing Strength Cap
From
Edge Distance Limit
Strength
strong
Relationship
Edge distance affects bearing strength via the 1.2×lc×t×Fu term, but is capped by 2.4×db×t×Fu; very large edge distances do not increase bearing beyond the cap
To
Net Section Area
From
Member Rupture
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Member tensile capacity at the bolt-hole section; net area = gross area minus area of holes; often checked separately from connection but must be verified
To
Full Penetration
From
Groove Weld
Strength
strong
Relationship
Full-penetration groove welds develop the full strength of the base metal; no strength reduction from weld geometry; controls member rupture at net section instead
To
Interaction with Shear
From
Bolt Tension
Strength
moderate
Relationship
When bolt carries both shear and tension, combined stress reduces capacity; interaction formula adjusts shear strength when tension is present
To
Plate Thickness
From
Minimum Weld Size
Strength
moderate
Relationship
AISC J2.2 specifies minimum fillet weld size based on plate thickness; thicker plates require larger welds; common sizes 1/4" to 1/2"
To
Bolt Hole Spacing
From
Clear Distance lc
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Clear distance is the gap between the edge of one hole and the edge of the next (or plate edge); controls bearing strength; minimum pitch typically 2.67×db
To
Governing Failure Mode
From
Design Strength Determination
Strength
strong
Relationship
Process: (1) calculate all limit states, (2) identify minimum, (3) that minimum is connection design strength; board exams heavily test this concept
Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.