CELE Strength of Materials — Stresses in BeamsConcept Map
If you learn better by seeing ideas connected visually, this concept map of Stresses in Beams is built for you. Every CELE Strength of Materials question draws on these relationships, so building this map mentally is half the battle when you sit for CELE 2026.
Exam context
The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Strength of Materials subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Stresses in Beams appears in position 4th of 8 in the CELE Strength of Materials review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.
Stresses in Beams - Concept Map
Central Concept
Internal Stresses Produced by Bending Moment and Shear Force in Elastic Beams
Related Concepts
Concept
Flexural (Bending) Stress
Sub Concepts
- Neutral Axis (NA) location at centroid
- Zero stress at NA; maximum at extreme fibers
- Flexure formula: σ = My/I
- Maximum bending stress: σ_max = Mc/I = M/S
- Section Modulus S = I/c
- Sagging moment: bottom fiber in tension, top in compression
Relationship To Central
Primary stress type; linear variation through beam depth governs member sizing
Concept
Horizontal Shear Stress
Sub Concepts
- Shear stress formula: τ = VQ/(Ib)
- First moment of area Q about neutral axis
- Zero at top and bottom fibers; maximum at NA
- Rectangular section: τ_max = 3V/(2A)
- Circular section: τ_max = 4V/(3A)
- Wide-flange approximation: τ ≈ V/A_web
Relationship To Central
Secondary stress type; parabolic distribution; complements bending stress analysis
Concept
Section Modulus and Design
Sub Concepts
- Definition: S = I/c
- Rectangular section: S = bh²/6
- Circular section: S = πd³/32
- Design formula: S_required = M_max/σ_allow
- Efficiency principle: deep sections are superior in bending
- I-beam principle: flanges maximize S while minimizing weight
Relationship To Central
Key design parameter linking moment to allowable stress; governs section selection
Concept
Moment of Inertia (I) and Centroid
Sub Concepts
- Rectangular: I = bh³/12
- Circular: I = πd⁴/64
- Parallel-axis theorem for composite sections
- Centroid location for unsymmetric (T-, L-) sections
- Different I values for major and minor axes
Relationship To Central
Geometric properties defining stress distribution; essential for flexure and shear formulas
Concept
Shear Flow in Built-Up Beams
Sub Concepts
- Shear flow definition: q = VQ/I
- Connector capacity and spacing: s = F/q
- Nailed wood built-up sections
- Bolted plate girders
- Welded I-beam and box-beam fabrication
- NSCP 2015 spacing limits
Relationship To Central
Application of shear stress formula; determines connector spacing in fabricated sections
Concept
Combined Axial and Bending Stress
Sub Concepts
- Combined stress formula: σ = P/A ± Mc/I
- Eccentric load: M = Pe (eccentricity e)
- Kern (core) of a section
- Middle-third rule for rectangles (e ≤ h/6)
- Tension limit for masonry and footings
- Short-column behavior under off-center loads
Relationship To Central
Superposition principle; eccentric loading produces both normal and bending stress
Concept
Beam Design Process
Sub Concepts
- Step 1: Calculate M_max and V_max from SFD/BMD
- Step 2: Flexure design using S_required = M/σ_allow
- Step 3: Shear verification using τ_max ≤ τ_allow
- Step 4: Serviceability check (deflection — Chapter 5)
- Flexure-governed vs. shear-governed beams
- Allowable stress selection per NSCP 2015, ACI 318, AISC 360
Relationship To Central
Systematic approach integrating both flexure and shear checks; ensures safe member sizing
Concept
Unsymmetric (Non-Rectangular) Sections
Sub Concepts
- Neutral axis not at mid-depth
- Different c_top and c_bottom distances
- Composite parallel-axis moment of inertia
- Stress at top vs. stress at bottom
- Identification of governess (critical) fiber
- Application to RC T-beams and steel plate girders
Relationship To Central
Extended analysis for T-beams, L-beams, and composite sections; different top and bottom stresses
Concept
Material Assumptions and Linearity
Sub Concepts
- Linear elastic material behavior
- Plane sections remain plane
- Stress proportional to strain (Hooke's Law)
- Small deflection assumption
- Homogeneous, isotropic material
- Limit before yielding (plastic behavior)
Relationship To Central
Foundation assumptions enabling the flexure formula; limit range of validity
Concept Connections
To
Section Modulus and Design
From
Flexural Bending Stress
Strength
strong
Relationship
Section modulus (S = I/c) is the direct design shortcut; σ_max = M/S eliminates need to calculate c and I separately
To
Flexural Bending Stress
From
Moment of Inertia (I) and Centroid
Strength
strong
Relationship
Flexure formula σ = My/I depends directly on I and location of y relative to centroid (neutral axis)
To
Moment of Inertia (I) and Centroid
From
Horizontal Shear Stress
Strength
strong
Relationship
Shear formula τ = VQ/(Ib) requires I and Q (first moment of area) computed about the centroidal axis
To
Horizontal Shear Stress
From
Shear Flow in Built-Up Beams
Strength
strong
Relationship
Shear flow q = VQ/I is directly derived from shear stress τ = VQ/(Ib); connector spacing s = F/q applies this concept
To
Flexural Bending Stress
From
Combined Axial and Bending Stress
Strength
strong
Relationship
Combined stress superimposes axial stress (P/A) and bending stress (Mc/I); uses same bending formula but adds uniform term
To
Moment of Inertia (I) and Centroid
From
Unsymmetric (Non-Rectangular) Sections
Strength
strong
Relationship
Non-rectangular sections require careful centroid location and parallel-axis moment of inertia; NA is not at mid-depth
To
Flexural Bending Stress
From
Beam Design Process
Strength
strong
Relationship
Step 1 of design: calculate S_required = M_max/σ_allow using flexure concept; then select section with sufficient S
To
Horizontal Shear Stress
From
Beam Design Process
Strength
strong
Relationship
Step 2 of design: verify shear capacity using τ_max = VQ/(Ib) ≤ τ_allow; often governs short, heavily loaded beams
To
Flexural Bending Stress
From
Material Assumptions and Linearity
Strength
strong
Relationship
Linear stress-strain relationship (Hooke's Law) and plane-sections assumption are foundations enabling the linear flexure formula
To
Unsymmetric (Non-Rectangular) Sections
From
Section Modulus and Design
Strength
moderate
Relationship
For asymmetric sections, must compute S from I/c using different c_top and c_bottom; yields different S values at top and bottom
To
Moment of Inertia (I) and Centroid
From
Combined Axial and Bending Stress
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Kern of section (middle-third rule for rectangles) depends on centroid location; determines safe eccentricity without tension
To
Material Assumptions and Linearity
From
Flexural Bending Stress
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Validity of σ = My/I is limited to elastic range before yielding; assumes linear elastic behavior and small deflections
To
Shear Flow in Built-Up Beams
From
Horizontal Shear Stress
Strength
strong
Relationship
Shear flow is the extension of horizontal shear stress; determines how much horizontal force per unit length must be transmitted by connectors
To
Combined Axial and Bending Stress
From
Beam Design Process
Strength
moderate
Relationship
For eccentric loads or short columns, design process includes superposing axial and bending effects; must check tension limits
To
Flexural Bending Stress
From
Unsymmetric (Non-Rectangular) Sections
Strength
strong
Relationship
For T-, L-, and I-beams, apply flexure formula σ = My/I at different distances c_top and c_bottom from NA; yields unequal stresses
Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.