Skip to main content
Revision NotesCELE · Reinforced & Prestressed ConcreteReal content

CELE Reinforced & Prestressed ConcreteReinforced Concrete Footings, Bond and DevelopmentRevision Notes

Revision notes for CELE Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete Reinforced Concrete Footings, Bond and Development — designed for time-pressed reviewers. These notes skip the basics and focus on what Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering consistently tests, so you spend your revision hours on the content most likely to appear on exam day.

Exam context

The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Reinforced Concrete Footings, Bond and Development appears in position 6th of 7 in the CELE Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.

Reinforced Concrete Footings, Bond and Development - Revision Notes

Footings are the structural elements that transfer column and wall loads to the supporting soil at a pressure that does not exceed the allowable bearing capacity. In the PRC Civil Engineer Licensure Examination, footing problems consistently appear and test three core competencies: (1) sizing the footing plan area using service loads and allowable soil pressure, (2) checking two modes of shear — two-way punching shear and one-way beam shear — using factored loads, and (3) ensuring reinforcing bars are properly developed (anchored) so they can reach yield before pulling out. This chapter also covers flexural design at the critical section (column face) and the computation of development lengths per NSCP 2015 (aligned with ACI 318). Mastery of these topics requires disciplined use of service vs. factored loads, correct identification of critical sections, and accurate application of the shear and development-length formulas.

Sections

Formulas

Example

P_service = 1 200 kN, q_a = 200 kPa → A_req = 1 200/200 = 6.0 m² → B = √6.0 = 2.449 m → use 2.5 m × 2.5 m

Formula

A_req = P_service / q_a

Variables

A_req = required footing plan area (m²); P_service = total service load on footing (kN); q_a = allowable soil bearing pressure (kPa = kN/m²)

Application

First step in footing design — determines how large the footing must be to keep soil stress within safe limits.

Example

P_u = 1 700 kN, A = 2.5 × 2.5 = 6.25 m² → q_u = 1 700/6.25 = 272 kPa

Formula

q_u = P_u / A_footing

Variables

q_u = net upward factored soil pressure (kPa); P_u = factored column load (kN); A_footing = actual adopted footing area (m²)

Application

Used for all structural design checks: punching shear, one-way shear, and flexure.

Exam Tips

  • If the problem gives both dead load D and live load L separately, first compute P_service = D + L for sizing, then P_u = 1.2D + 1.6L for design.
  • If the problem states 'factored load' directly, you can compute q_u immediately — no need to back-calculate service load.
  • Always recompute q_u using the ADOPTED (rounded-up) footing area, not A_req.

Key Points

  • Footing plan area is sized using SERVICE loads (dead + live, unfactored), not factored loads.
  • Allowable soil pressure q_a (kPa) is a geotechnical parameter from soil investigation; it accounts for safety already.
  • For a square footing: A_req = P_service / q_a ; side B = √A_req ; always round UP to the next practical dimension (e.g., nearest 50 mm or 100 mm).
  • For a rectangular footing: specify L and W such that L × W ≥ A_req and the aspect ratio L/W ≤ 2 (practical rule).
  • The SELF-WEIGHT of the footing and backfill is often included in the service load for net bearing pressure calculations; exam problems usually state whether to include it.
  • Once the plan area is fixed, the NET UPWARD FACTORED PRESSURE q_u = P_u / A_footing is used for ALL subsequent structural design checks.
  • P_u is typically 1.2D + 1.6L (NSCP 2015 load combination 1) for gravity-dominated cases.

Definitions

Term

Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (q_a)

Definition

The maximum safe contact pressure between the footing base and the soil, determined from geotechnical analysis and including an appropriate factor of safety (typically FS = 3). It is a SERVICE-level limit.

Importance

Exam problems always state q_a; never apply load factors to q_a — it is already a safe allowable value.

Term

Net Upward Factored Pressure (q_u)

Definition

The uniformly distributed upward soil reaction per unit area used in structural design, computed from the factored column load divided by the footing plan area.

Importance

This is the design pressure for shear and moment calculations. Confusing service and factored pressures is the #1 board-exam mistake.

Section Title

1. Footing Sizing — Service Load and Allowable Soil Pressure

Common Mistakes

  • Using factored load P_u to size the footing area (over-sizing) — footing AREA sizing uses SERVICE load.
  • Using service load P_service for shear and moment checks (under-design) — shear and flexure use FACTORED load.
  • Forgetting to round up the footing dimension after computing √A_req.
  • Ignoring the self-weight of footing concrete and soil overburden when specified in the problem.

Formulas

Example

c = 400 mm, d = 500 mm → b_o = 4(400 + 500) = 3 600 mm

Formula

b_o = 4(c + d) [square column]

Variables

b_o = critical shear perimeter (mm); c = column side dimension (mm); d = effective depth of footing (mm)

Application

Defines the punching perimeter at d/2 from all four column faces.

Example

f'c = 28 MPa, b_o = 3 600 mm, d = 500 mm → V_c = 0.33(1.0)√28 × 3 600 × 500 = 0.33 × 5.292 × 1 800 000 = 3 143 kN

Formula

V_c = 0.33λ√f'c · b_o · d (governing for square columns)

Variables

V_c = nominal punching shear strength (N); λ = 1.0 for normal-weight concrete; f'c = concrete compressive strength (MPa); b_o = critical perimeter (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

Nominal two-way shear capacity of the concrete footing.

Example

q_u = 272 kPa, A = 6.25 m², (c+d)² = (0.9 m)² = 0.81 m² → V_u = 272(6.25 − 0.81) = 272 × 5.44 = 1 480 kN

Formula

V_u = q_u[A_footing − (c + d)²]

Variables

V_u = factored punching shear demand (kN); q_u = net upward factored pressure (kPa); A_footing = total footing plan area (m²); (c + d)² = area inside critical perimeter (m², converted from mm²)

Application

Computes the upward force that the soil exerts on the footing area outside the punching perimeter — this is the force trying to punch the column through.

Example

φV_c = 0.75 × 3 143 = 2 357 kN > V_u = 1 480 kN → SAFE

Formula

φV_c ≥ V_u (φ = 0.75)

Variables

φ = strength reduction factor for shear = 0.75 per NSCP 2015

Application

Design adequacy check; if φV_c < V_u, increase footing depth d or increase f'c.

Exam Tips

  • Board exams almost always use square columns — memorize b_o = 4(c + d) and V_c = 0.33λ√f'c · b_o · d.
  • Critical perimeter area = (c + d)² for a square column; this is the area to SUBTRACT from A_footing.
  • To quickly check: if d > 0.3B, the footing is likely very deep — uncommon in practice but possible in exam problems.
  • When asked which shear governs, compute both punching and one-way; report the one with the lower φV_c relative to V_u.

Key Points

  • Punching shear is the tendency of the column to punch through the footing like a cookie cutter. It governs for most square footings with compact columns.
  • The critical perimeter b_o is taken at d/2 from ALL FACES of the column (or loaded area).
  • For a square column of side c: b_o = 4(c + d), where d is the effective depth of the footing.
  • NSCP 2015 Section 422.6 (ACI 318-19 Section 22.6) gives THREE expressions for V_c; the SMALLEST governs.
  • For square or compact columns (β_c = 1), the expression V_c = 0.33λ√f'c · b_o · d typically governs and is tested most frequently on boards.
  • The punching shear DEMAND V_u = q_u × [A_footing − (c + d)²] — i.e., the upward force on the area OUTSIDE the critical perimeter.
  • Strength reduction factor φ = 0.75 for shear (NSCP 2015).
  • Design requirement: φV_c ≥ V_u.

Definitions

Term

Two-Way (Punching) Shear

Definition

A failure mode where the column punches through the footing along a truncated pyramid surface. The critical section is a closed perimeter at d/2 from the column face.

Importance

Usually the FIRST and most critical shear check for square footings. If it fails, you must increase depth d.

Term

Critical Perimeter b_o

Definition

The perimeter of the critical section for two-way shear, measured at a distance d/2 from the faces of the column or other loaded area.

Importance

Fundamental parameter in punching shear calculations. For a square column of side c: b_o = 4(c + d).

Term

β_c

Definition

The ratio of the long side to the short side of the column cross-section. For square columns β_c = 1. The NSCP/ACI punching shear formula with β_c governs only when the column is very elongated.

Importance

Exam problems with square columns bypass the β_c formula; use V_c = 0.33λ√f'c · b_o · d directly.

Section Title

2. Two-Way (Punching) Shear

Common Mistakes

  • Placing the critical perimeter at d from the column face (beam shear location) instead of d/2 — punching is at d/2.
  • Using the TOTAL footing area (not subtracting the interior area) for the punching demand V_u.
  • Forgetting to convert (c + d) from mm to m when computing the area in m².
  • Applying φ = 0.90 (flexure factor) instead of φ = 0.75 (shear factor).
  • Not checking all three NSCP punching shear expressions and assuming 0.33 always governs — it governs for square/compact columns but not for very elongated ones.

Formulas

Example

f'c = 28 MPa, B = 2 500 mm, d = 500 mm → V_c = 0.17(1.0)(5.292)(2 500)(500) = 1 124 kN

Formula

V_c = 0.17λ√f'c · B · d

Variables

V_c = nominal one-way shear strength (N); λ = 1.0 for normal-weight concrete; f'c (MPa); B = full footing width (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

One-way shear capacity of the footing acting as a wide beam.

Example

B = 2 500 mm, c = 400 mm, d = 500 mm → L_crit = (2 500 − 400)/2 − 500 = 1 050 − 500 = 550 mm

Formula

L_crit = (B − c)/2 − d

Variables

L_crit = distance from column face to critical shear section (mm); B = footing width (mm); c = column width (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

Defines the overhang length whose upward soil pressure creates one-way shear at the critical section.

Example

q_u = 272 kPa, B = 2.5 m, L_crit = 0.55 m → V_u = 272 × 2.5 × 0.55 = 374 kN

Formula

V_u = q_u × B × L_crit

Variables

V_u = factored one-way shear demand (kN); q_u (kN/m²); B (m); L_crit (m)

Application

Upward soil force on the strip from the footing edge to the critical section.

Exam Tips

  • Quick memory aid: 0.33 for TWO-way (punching), 0.17 for ONE-way (beam shear).
  • If the problem asks only for the 'critical section for beam shear,' the answer is: at distance d from the column face.
  • When d is large relative to the cantilever, L_crit can become very small or even negative — meaning one-way shear is not critical (the critical section falls inside the column).

Key Points

  • One-way shear treats the footing as a wide beam spanning between column and footing edge.
  • Critical section is taken at a distance d from the FACE OF THE COLUMN (not the center).
  • For a square footing of side B with a square column of side c, the projecting cantilever length to the critical section is: L_crit = (B − c)/2 − d.
  • The shear demand V_u = q_u × B × L_crit (force on the strip beyond the critical section).
  • Nominal one-way shear capacity: V_c = 0.17λ√f'c · B · d (NSCP 2015 / ACI 318).
  • Same strength reduction factor φ = 0.75.
  • One-way shear usually does NOT govern for compact square footings but must always be checked.
  • If one-way shear is critical, increase d (preferred) or increase f'c.

Definitions

Term

One-Way (Beam) Shear

Definition

A shear failure mode where the footing acts as a wide, short cantilever beam. The failure plane is approximately vertical, extending across the full width B of the footing at a distance d from the column face.

Importance

Secondary shear check after punching shear. Critical for long, narrow footings or very shallow effective depths.

Section Title

3. One-Way (Beam) Shear

Common Mistakes

  • Placing the critical section at the column FACE (flexure location) instead of at distance d from the column face.
  • Using the FULL cantilever length instead of the reduced length L_crit = (B−c)/2 − d.
  • Forgetting to use the FULL footing width B (not B − c) for V_c.
  • Using V_c = 0.33λ√f'c · Bd (punching coefficient) for one-way shear — one-way uses 0.17.

Formulas

Example

B = 2.5 m, c = 0.4 m → ℓ = (2.5 − 0.4)/2 = 1.05 m

Formula

ℓ = (B − c)/2

Variables

ℓ = cantilevered projection from column face to footing edge (m or mm); B = footing width; c = column width

Application

Lever arm for moment calculation at the critical section.

Example

q_u = 272 kPa, B = 2.5 m, ℓ = 1.05 m → M_u = 272 × 2.5 × 1.05²/2 = 272 × 2.5 × 0.5513 = 375 kN·m

Formula

M_u = q_u × B × ℓ²/2

Variables

M_u = factored moment at column face (kN·m); q_u (kN/m²); B = footing width (m); ℓ = cantilever projection (m)

Application

Design moment for flexural reinforcement calculation.

Example

M_u = 375 kN·m = 375 × 10⁶ N·mm, φ = 0.90, B = 2 500 mm, d = 500 mm → R_n = 375×10⁶/(0.90 × 2 500 × 500²) = 375×10⁶/562 500 000 = 0.667 MPa

Formula

R_n = M_u / (φ × B × d²) → ρ = (0.85f'c/f_y)[1 − √(1 − 2R_n/(0.85f'c))] → A_s = ρBd

Variables

R_n = flexural resistance coefficient (MPa); φ = 0.90 for flexure; ρ = steel ratio; A_s = required steel area (mm²); B and d in mm, M_u in N·mm

Application

Standard beam flexural design procedure applied to the footing strip.

Exam Tips

  • Memorize the sequence: SIZE (service load) → q_u (factored) → PUNCHING shear → ONE-WAY shear → FLEXURE (column face) → DEVELOPMENT.
  • For board exams that ask for M_u only, the formula M_u = q_u·B·ℓ²/2 is the fastest route.
  • Minimum steel for footings is often taken as the slab temperature/shrinkage minimum: A_s,min = 0.0018 × b × h (for fy = 415 MPa).

Key Points

  • The critical section for MOMENT is at the FACE OF THE COLUMN (not d from the face).
  • The footing cantilevers out from the column face; the net upward pressure q_u creates an upward moment.
  • For a square footing: cantilevered projection ℓ = (B − c)/2.
  • Factored moment at column face: M_u = q_u × B × ℓ²/2 (treating the full width B as the beam width).
  • Once M_u is found, design A_s exactly as for a rectangular beam section: compute R_n = M_u/(φ × B × d²), then ρ = (0.85f'c/f_y)[1 − √(1 − 2R_n/(0.85f'c))], then A_s = ρ × B × d.
  • Check: A_s ≥ A_s,min = (0.0018 × B × h) for Grade 60 / fy = 415 MPa deformed bars (temperature and shrinkage minimum for slabs, often used for footings).
  • Bars are placed in TWO directions for square footings; for rectangular footings, a central band carries more steel in the short direction.
  • The reinforcing bars must be DEVELOPED (anchored) within the footing — check ℓ_d available ≥ ℓ_d required.

Definitions

Term

Critical Section for Moment

Definition

The section of maximum factored moment in a footing, located at the FACE of the column (for concrete columns) or at the middle of the base plate (for steel columns). This is where flexural reinforcement is designed.

Importance

Distinguished from the critical section for shear (which is at d from the face). Confusing these locations leads to errors in both M_u and V_u.

Term

Cantilever Projection (ℓ)

Definition

The horizontal distance from the column face to the edge of the footing. The upward soil pressure over this length creates the bending moment at the critical section.

Importance

The moment M_u is proportional to ℓ²; larger footings with smaller columns have much larger moments.

Section Title

4. Flexural Design of Footings

Common Mistakes

  • Taking the critical moment section at d from the column face (beam shear location) — flexure is at the column FACE.
  • Using only HALF the footing width (B/2) instead of the full width B in the moment formula.
  • Forgetting to convert M_u from kN·m to N·mm before computing R_n (factor of 10⁶).
  • Using φ = 0.75 (shear) instead of φ = 0.90 (flexure) in the moment check.

Formulas

Example

d_b = 20 mm, f_y = 415 MPa, f'c = 35 MPa, ψ_t = 1.3 (top bar), ψ_e = 1.0, λ = 1.0 → ℓ_d = 415(1.3)(1.0)/[2.1(1.0)√35] × 20 = 539.5/(2.1 × 5.916) × 20 = 539.5/12.42 × 20 = 43.44 × 20 = 869 mm ≥ 300 mm ✓

Formula

ℓ_d = (f_y · ψ_t · ψ_e)/(2.1 · λ · √f'c) · d_b [bars ≤ 20 mm, favorable conditions]

Variables

ℓ_d = development length (mm); f_y = steel yield stress (MPa); ψ_t = casting position factor; ψ_e = coating factor; λ = lightweight factor (1.0 for NW); f'c (MPa); d_b = bar diameter (mm)

Application

Tension development length for smaller bars with adequate cover and bar spacing.

Example

d_b = 25 mm, f_y = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, ψ_t = ψ_e = 1.0, λ = 1.0 → ℓ_d = 415(1.0)(1.0)/[1.7(1.0)√28] × 25 = 415/(1.7 × 5.292) × 25 = 415/8.996 × 25 = 46.13 × 25 = 1 153 mm ≈ 1 150 mm

Formula

ℓ_d = (f_y · ψ_t · ψ_e)/(1.7 · λ · √f'c) · d_b [bars > 20 mm, favorable conditions]

Variables

Same as above; coefficient 1.7 applies to bars larger than 20 mm diameter.

Application

Tension development length for larger bars (25 mm, 28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm) with adequate cover and spacing.

Example

d_b = 25 mm, f_y = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa → ℓ_dh = 0.24(1.0)(415)/(1.0 × √28) × 25 = 99.6/5.292 × 25 = 18.82 × 25 = 470 mm; apply 0.7 factor if adequate cover → 0.7 × 470 = 329 mm

Formula

ℓ_d,hook = (0.24 · ψ_e · f_y)/(λ · √f'c) · d_b [standard 90° hook]

Variables

ℓ_d,hook = hook development length (mm); ψ_e = 1.0 for uncoated bars; other symbols same as above

Application

When straight embedment length is insufficient (e.g., at column-footing interface), standard hooks provide anchorage in shorter length.

Exam Tips

  • In footings, main bars are BOTTOM bars (ψ_t = 1.0) and usually UNCOATED (ψ_e = 1.0); this simplifies the formula.
  • Quick check: for f_y = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, uncoated bottom bar > 20 mm → ℓ_d/d_b ≈ 415/(1.7 × 5.292) = 46.1 → ℓ_d ≈ 46 × d_b.
  • Bar cutoff in footings: bars must extend to within cover of the footing edge, so available ℓ_d = ℓ − cover_end.
  • When asked 'is the bar adequately developed?': compute ℓ_d required and compare with ℓ_available = (B − c)/2 − end cover.

Key Points

  • Development length ℓ_d is the minimum bar embedment required for the bar to reach its yield stress f_y through bond with concrete. Shorter embedment = bar pulls out before yielding.
  • NSCP 2015 Section 425 (ACI 318 Chapter 25) gives ℓ_d formulas with MODIFICATION FACTORS ψ_t, ψ_e, ψ_s, λ.
  • Simplified NSCP/ACI formulas (favorable spacing/cover conditions): ≤ 20 mm bars: ℓ_d = (f_y · ψ_t · ψ_e)/(2.1 · λ · √f'c) · d_b ; Larger bars (> 20 mm): ℓ_d = (f_y · ψ_t · ψ_e)/(1.7 · λ · √f'c) · d_b
  • Less-favorable conditions (tight spacing or small cover): coefficients change from 2.1 to 1.4 (≤ 20 mm) and from 1.7 to 1.1 (> 20 mm).
  • Minimum ℓ_d = 300 mm regardless of calculation.
  • Modification factors: ψ_t = 1.3 for top bars (more than 300 mm of fresh concrete below the bar during casting); ψ_e = 1.5 for epoxy-coated bars with cover < 3d_b or spacing < 6d_b; ψ_e = 1.2 for other epoxy conditions; ψ_s = 0.8 for bars ≤ 20 mm (some references); λ = 1.0 for normal-weight concrete.
  • In footings, bars are BOTTOM bars (ψ_t = 1.0) and typically uncoated (ψ_e = 1.0), so ψ_t · ψ_e = 1.0.
  • Available development length = ℓ - cover (from column face to bar end minus end cover). Must be ≥ ℓ_d.
  • Standard hooks provide anchorage equivalent to ℓ_dh (hook development length) when straight embedment is insufficient.

Definitions

Term

Development Length (ℓ_d)

Definition

The minimum length of bar embedment in concrete required to develop the full yield force T = A_s · f_y through bond stress between bar and concrete. A bar with embedment less than ℓ_d will pull out before yielding.

Importance

Critical for structural safety. Board exams frequently ask for ℓ_d computation and comparison with available anchorage length.

Term

Casting Position Factor (ψ_t)

Definition

Modification factor that accounts for reduced bond quality for bars with more than 300 mm of fresh concrete cast below them ('top bars'). ψ_t = 1.3 for top bars, 1.0 for all others.

Importance

Always check if the bar is a top bar (ψ_t = 1.3) — this increases ℓ_d by 30%.

Term

Coating Factor (ψ_e)

Definition

Modification factor for epoxy-coated bars, which have reduced bond. ψ_e = 1.5 or 1.2 for epoxy-coated; 1.0 for uncoated bars.

Importance

Most footing bars are uncoated (ψ_e = 1.0); exam problems will explicitly state if bars are epoxy-coated.

Term

Standard Hook

Definition

A bar end bent at 90° (with 12d_b extension) or 180° (with 4d_b extension) that mechanically anchors the bar in concrete. Used when straight development length ℓ_d exceeds the available embedment.

Importance

Hooks allow shorter embedment — a common design solution at footing-column interfaces.

Section Title

5. Development Length and Bond

Common Mistakes

  • Using coefficient 2.1 (≤ 20 mm) for a 25 mm bar — coefficient 1.7 applies to bars larger than 20 mm.
  • Forgetting to apply ψ_t = 1.3 for top bars — increases ℓ_d by 30%.
  • Not applying the 300 mm minimum floor on ℓ_d.
  • Comparing ℓ_d with the FULL cantilever ℓ instead of ℓ minus end cover.
  • Confusing ℓ_d (straight development) with ℓ_dh (hook development) — these are different formulas.

Connections

  • Footing flexural design uses the same rectangular beam theory (Whitney stress block, R_n, ρ) as beams — the footing is just a very wide, short cantilever beam.
  • The shear strength formulas (0.33 and 0.17 × λ√f'c) are the same concrete shear expressions used for beams and slabs; the difference is only the critical perimeter or section definition.
  • Development length theory underpins ALL reinforced concrete elements — columns, beams, slabs, walls, and footings all require bar development; same formulas, same ψ factors apply.
  • Load combinations (1.2D + 1.6L) from NSCP 2015 Section 405 apply universally to all RC elements including footings — the factored load P_u used in footing design follows the same LRFD load factors as beams and columns.
  • Soil-structure interaction: the footing connects structural engineering (RC design) with geotechnical engineering (bearing capacity, settlement). Allowable bearing pressure q_a from soil mechanics directly governs footing sizing.
  • Transfer of force from column to footing through bearing and dowels connects column design to footing design — dowel bars must also satisfy development length requirements at the column-footing interface.
  • Prestressed concrete footings (uncommon but possible) would use the same plan-area sizing but different flexural and shear approaches — the bond/development concept shifts to transfer length and development length for prestressing strand.
  • Retaining wall footings follow the same two shear checks and flexural design as isolated footings, adding overturning and sliding stability checks from geotechnical analysis.

Exam Strategy

For PRC board exam footing problems, follow this disciplined FIVE-STEP sequence and never skip a step: (1) SIZE — compute A_req = P_service/q_a, select B (round up), this step uses SERVICE load only. (2) PRESSURE — compute q_u = P_u/A_adopted using FACTORED load and ADOPTED area. (3) PUNCHING SHEAR — compute b_o = 4(c+d), V_c = 0.33λ√f'c·b_o·d, V_u = q_u[A−(c+d)²], check φV_c ≥ V_u with φ = 0.75. (4) ONE-WAY SHEAR — compute L_crit = (B−c)/2 − d, V_c = 0.17λ√f'c·B·d, V_u = q_u·B·L_crit, check φV_c ≥ V_u. (5) FLEXURE and DEVELOPMENT — M_u = q_u·B·ℓ²/2 at column face, design A_s, then verify ℓ_available ≥ ℓ_d. Memory aids: SIZE=service, DESIGN=factored; PUNCHING critical at d/2 (0.33), ONE-WAY critical at d from face (0.17); MOMENT critical at column face (no d offset). For development length: ≤20 mm bar uses 2.1, >20 mm bar uses 1.7 (favorable conditions); always check ψ_t (=1.3 for top bars) and apply 300 mm floor. Budget approximately 8–12 minutes for a complete footing design problem; if time-pressed, focus on whichever check the question specifically asks for rather than working all five steps. Watch for the classic trick of mixing service and factored loads — identify which load type is given before computing anything.

Quick Review Questions

A column carries a service dead load of 700 kN and live load of 500 kN. The allowable soil bearing pressure is 180 kPa. What is the minimum required area for a square footing, and what size should be adopted?

Footing area sizing uses the SERVICE load (unfactored D + L) divided by the allowable soil pressure. After computing the theoretical B, always round UP to a practical dimension. A 2.6 m × 2.6 m footing provides A = 6.76 m² ≥ 6.667 m² required.

For the footing in Q1 with P_u = 1.2(700) + 1.6(500) = 1 640 kN, compute q_u using the adopted 2.6 m × 2.6 m footing.

q_u must be computed using the ADOPTED (rounded-up) footing area, not A_req. This ensures the actual soil pressure is modeled correctly for design.

A 2.5 m × 2.5 m footing supports a 350 mm square column with effective depth d = 450 mm and f'c = 21 MPa. What is φV_c for punching shear?

For a square column, b_o = 4(c + d). The punching V_c uses the coefficient 0.33. φ = 0.75 for shear. Always convert final answer to kN (divide N result by 1 000).

Using the footing in Q3 with q_u = 272 kPa (hypothetically), what is the punching shear demand V_u?

(c + d) = 0.35 + 0.45 = 0.80 m; (c + d)² = 0.64 m². The area inside the critical perimeter is subtracted from the total footing area to get the area over which upward pressure acts to cause punching.

For a 3.0 m square footing with a 500 mm square column, d = 550 mm, q_u = 250 kPa, and f'c = 28 MPa, check one-way shear adequacy.

The critical section for one-way shear is at distance d from the column face. L_crit is the strip length beyond this section. V_u is the upward force on this strip. One-way V_c uses coefficient 0.17 and the full footing width B = 3 000 mm.

Compute M_u at the column face for a 2.5 m footing with 400 mm square column and q_u = 272 kPa.

Critical section for moment is at the COLUMN FACE. ℓ is the cantilever projection. The formula M_u = q_u·B·ℓ²/2 treats the footing as a uniformly loaded cantilever slab of width B.

Find the tension development length for a 32 mm bar with f_y = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, normal-weight concrete, uncoated bottom bar, favorable spacing/cover.

For bars larger than 20 mm with favorable cover and spacing, the coefficient is 1.7. ψ_t = 1.0 (bottom bar, not top bar), ψ_e = 1.0 (uncoated), λ = 1.0 (normal-weight). The result 1 476 mm exceeds the 300 mm minimum, so 1 480 mm controls.

A 20 mm top bar (ψ_t = 1.3) in a beam with f'c = 35 MPa, f_y = 415 MPa, uncoated, normal-weight, favorable conditions. Find ℓ_d.

The casting position factor ψ_t = 1.3 applies because this is a top bar (more than 300 mm of concrete below it). This increases ℓ_d by 30% compared to a bottom bar. The 20 mm bar uses the 2.1 coefficient (favorable conditions).

Why is the coefficient 2.1 (not 1.7) used for bars ≤ 20 mm in the development length formula?

The development length formula ℓ_d = (f_y·ψ·...)/(k·λ·√f'c)·d_b has k in the denominator. A larger k means shorter ℓ_d. Smaller bars bond more efficiently, so k = 2.1 (shorter ℓ_d required) vs k = 1.7 for larger bars (longer ℓ_d required).

In a square footing with a 25 mm main bar and the available embedment from column face to bar end (minus 75 mm end cover) is 900 mm, while ℓ_d required = 1 153 mm. What design solution is appropriate?

When the available straight embedment is less than ℓ_d, a standard hook converts the anchorage to bearing of the bent portion, reducing the required embedment length to ℓ_dh. For 25 mm bars, ℓ_dh ≈ 470 mm (before modification factors), which would fit in 900 mm.

Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…

Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?

Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.