Skip to main content
Revision NotesCELE · Reinforced & Prestressed ConcreteReal content

CELE Reinforced & Prestressed ConcreteReinforced Concrete Beams: FlexureRevision Notes

Final-week revision notes for Reinforced Concrete Beams: Flexure. If you have already studied the full chapter, this page is your go-to refresher before sitting the CELE. Compact, high-yield, and aligned with what Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering tests in the Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete subtest.

Exam context

The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Reinforced Concrete Beams: Flexure appears in position 2nd of 7 in the CELE Reinforced & Prestressed Concrete review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.

Reinforced Concrete Beams: Flexure - Revision Notes

Flexural design and analysis of reinforced concrete beams is the single most heavily tested topic in the PSAD (Structural Engineering and Construction) portion of the PRC Civil Engineer Licensure Examination. This chapter covers the Ultimate Strength Design (USD) method as adopted by NSCP 2015 (aligned with ACI 318), focusing on the equivalent rectangular stress block, nominal and design moment capacity, steel-ratio limits, and extensions to doubly reinforced and T-beams. Mastery of this chapter gives you a direct advantage in the board exam: expect 3–6 problems from this topic alone in every exam cycle. All formulas use SI units (N, mm, MPa, kN·m).

Sections

Formulas

Example

As = 1473 mm², fy = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, b = 300 mm → a = 1473×415/(0.85×28×300) = 611,295/7,140 = 85.6 mm

Formula

a = As·fy / (0.85·f'c·b)

Variables

a = depth of equivalent stress block (mm); As = area of tension steel (mm²); fy = yield strength of steel (MPa); f'c = 28-day compressive strength of concrete (MPa); b = beam width (mm)

Application

Used in BOTH analysis (find a given As) and design (verify after computing As). Derived directly from horizontal force equilibrium C = T.

Example

a = 85.6 mm, f'c = 28 MPa → β₁ = 0.85 → c = 85.6/0.85 = 100.7 mm

Formula

c = a / β₁

Variables

c = neutral axis depth from extreme compression fiber (mm); β₁ = stress block factor (dimensionless)

Application

Needed to compute the net tensile strain εt for the tension-controlled check.

Example

d = 500 mm, c = 100.7 mm → εt = 0.003×(500−100.7)/100.7 = 0.003×3.963 = 0.0119 > 0.005 ✓ tension-controlled

Formula

εt = 0.003·(d − c) / c

Variables

εt = net tensile strain at extreme tension steel (dimensionless); d = effective depth (mm); c = neutral axis depth (mm); 0.003 = assumed ultimate concrete strain

Application

Determines φ-factor: if εt ≥ 0.005 → tension-controlled → φ = 0.90. If 0.002 < εt < 0.005 → transition zone → φ interpolated. If εt ≤ 0.002 → compression-controlled → φ = 0.65.

Example

As = 1473 mm², fy = 415 MPa, d = 500 mm, a = 85.6 mm → Mn = 1473×415×(500−42.8) = 611,295×457.2 = 279.4×10⁶ N·mm = 279.4 kN·m

Formula

Mn = As·fy·(d − a/2)

Variables

Mn = nominal moment capacity (N·mm or kN·m); As = tension steel area (mm²); fy = yield strength (MPa); d = effective depth (mm); a = stress block depth (mm)

Application

Core formula for moment capacity. The lever arm is (d − a/2), from the centroid of the tension force to the centroid of the compression force.

Example

Mn = 279.4 kN·m, φ = 0.90 → φMn = 0.90×279.4 = 251.5 kN·m

Formula

φMn = φ·As·fy·(d − a/2)

Variables

φ = strength reduction factor (0.90 for tension-controlled flexure per NSCP 2015 Section 421.2.1); Mn = nominal moment (kN·m)

Application

The DESIGN moment capacity. Must satisfy φMn ≥ Mu (factored moment demand).

Exam Tips

  • Memorize the stress block depth formula a = Asfy/(0.85f'cb) — it appears in virtually every beam problem.
  • Always verify tension-controlled status: compute c, then εt = 0.003(d−c)/c, check ≥ 0.005.
  • For f'c = 28 MPa and f'c = 21 MPa (common board values), β₁ = 0.85. For f'c = 35 MPa, β₁ = 0.85 − 0.05(35−28)/7 = 0.80.
  • The lever arm (d − a/2) is typically 85–95% of d for lightly reinforced beams — use this as a quick sanity check.

Key Points

  • At ultimate (flexural failure), concrete compressive stress is non-linear; the Whitney equivalent rectangular stress block simplifies this to a uniform stress of 0.85f'c over depth 'a', giving the same resultant force and location as the actual parabolic stress distribution.
  • The stress block depth a = β₁·c, where c is the neutral-axis depth measured from the extreme compression fiber.
  • β₁ depends on f'c (NSCP 2015, Section 422.2.2.4.3): β₁ = 0.85 for f'c ≤ 28 MPa; for f'c > 28 MPa, β₁ = 0.85 − 0.05(f'c − 28)/7 ≥ 0.65.
  • The concrete strain at extreme compression fiber is assumed to be εcu = 0.003 at ultimate (NSCP 2015).
  • Tension steel yields (fs = fy) in an under-reinforced (tension-controlled) section — this is the DESIRED failure mode.
  • Force equilibrium: Compression force C = 0.85f'c·b·a must equal Tension force T = As·fy.
  • The net tensile strain εt is measured at the centroid of the extreme tension steel layer, NOT the compression steel.

Definitions

Term

Effective Depth (d)

Definition

The distance from the extreme compression fiber to the centroid of the tension reinforcement. d = h − cover − stirrup diameter − (bar diameter/2) for a single layer of bars.

Importance

CRITICAL: Many board exam errors arise from using h (total beam height) instead of d. Always use d in flexural calculations.

Term

Neutral Axis

Definition

The horizontal axis at depth c from the extreme compression fiber where neither compression nor tension strain exists. The concrete below the neutral axis is assumed to be fully cracked and carries no tension in USD.

Importance

The position of the neutral axis determines εt and hence φ. It shifts with reinforcement area.

Term

Tension-Controlled Section

Definition

A flexural section where εt ≥ 0.005 at nominal strength. Steel yields well before concrete crushes, ensuring ductile, warning-type failure.

Importance

NSCP 2015 requires tension-controlled sections for φ = 0.90. The PRC board exam almost always requires this check.

Term

β₁ (Beta-one)

Definition

The ratio of the equivalent stress block depth 'a' to the neutral axis depth 'c'. β₁ = 0.85 for f'c ≤ 28 MPa; reduces by 0.05 per 7 MPa increase in f'c above 28 MPa, minimum 0.65.

Importance

Frequently tested in board exams, especially for higher-strength concrete (f'c = 35, 40 MPa). Forgetting to reduce β₁ is a common error.

Section Title

1. Fundamental Concepts: The Equivalent Stress Block (Whitney Block)

Common Mistakes

  • Using h (total depth) instead of d (effective depth) — this ALWAYS overestimates capacity.
  • Using f'c instead of 0.85f'c in the stress block formula — the 0.85 factor is mandatory.
  • Assuming φ = 0.90 without checking εt — an over-reinforced beam has lower φ (as low as 0.65).
  • Forgetting to reduce β₁ below 0.85 for f'c > 28 MPa.
  • Computing Mn in N·mm and forgetting to convert to kN·m (divide by 10⁶).

Formulas

Example

As = 1473 mm², b = 300 mm, d = 500 mm → ρ = 1473/(300×500) = 1473/150,000 = 0.00982

Formula

ρ = As / (b·d)

Variables

ρ = steel ratio (dimensionless); As = tension steel area (mm²); b = beam width (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

Compute actual steel ratio to compare against ρmin and ρmax limits.

Example

f'c = 28 MPa (β₁ = 0.85), fy = 415 MPa → ρb = 0.85×0.85×(28/415)×[600/1015] = 0.7225×0.06747×0.5911 = 0.0288

Formula

ρb = 0.85·β₁·(f'c/fy)·[600/(600+fy)]

Variables

ρb = balanced steel ratio; 600 = modulus of elasticity of steel Es = 200,000 MPa times εcu = 0.003 (i.e., 200,000×0.003 = 600); fy in MPa

Application

Theoretical reference point. Used to cross-check ρmax calculations. NOT used directly as a design limit under NSCP 2015.

Example

f'c = 28 MPa, β₁ = 0.85, fy = 415 MPa → ρmax = 0.85×0.85×(28/415)×0.375 = 0.7225×0.06747×0.375 = 0.0183

Formula

ρmax = 0.85·β₁·(f'c/fy)·(0.375)

Variables

0.375 = ratio derived from εt = 0.005 limit: 0.003/(0.003+0.005) = 0.375; ensures εt ≥ 0.005 at nominal strength

Application

Maximum steel ratio for a tension-controlled section (φ = 0.90). Equivalent to 0.75ρb approximately (the older code limit), but the εt-based approach is more rigorous.

Example

f'c = 28 MPa, fy = 415 MPa → 1.4/415 = 0.00337; √28/(4×415) = 5.292/1660 = 0.00319 → ρmin = max(0.00337, 0.00319) = 0.00337

Formula

ρmin = max[1.4/fy , √f'c/(4·fy)]

Variables

ρmin = minimum steel ratio; 1.4 and √f'c are empirical coefficients from NSCP 2015 Section 409.6.1.1; fy in MPa; f'c in MPa

Application

Lower bound on steel ratio. Use the LARGER of the two values. If As provided > (4/3)As_required, the ρmin check may be waived (NSCP 2015 exception).

Exam Tips

  • For fy = 415 MPa and f'c = 28 MPa (the most common board combination), memorize: ρb ≈ 0.0288, ρmax ≈ 0.0183, ρmin ≈ 0.00337.
  • A quick check: if ρ < ρmax and a < β₁d/2, the section is almost certainly tension-controlled — but always compute εt explicitly.
  • The 600/(600+fy) factor in ρb comes from similar triangles on the strain diagram with εcu = 0.003 — knowing the derivation helps you reconstruct the formula under exam pressure.
  • When f'c = 35 MPa: √35 = 5.916; √35/(4×415) = 0.00356 vs 1.4/415 = 0.00337 → ρmin = 0.00356 (second expression governs).

Key Points

  • The steel ratio ρ = As/(b·d) is a dimensionless index of how heavily a beam is reinforced.
  • ρmin prevents sudden brittle failure when the concrete cracks: the beam must carry at least the moment that caused cracking.
  • ρmax (tension-controlled limit) ensures ductile behavior by keeping the net tensile strain ≥ 0.005 at ultimate.
  • ρb is the BALANCED steel ratio — theoretical value where concrete crushing and steel yielding occur simultaneously (εt = εy at the same load). Under NSCP 2015, ρb itself is NOT the design limit — ρmax < ρb.
  • The NSCP 2015 / ACI 318-14 approach replaces the old '0.75ρb' maximum with the εt ≥ 0.005 requirement, resulting in ρmax = 0.85β₁(f'c/fy)(0.375).
  • Always check BOTH ρmin and ρmax: a beam with ρ < ρmin fails brittlely at cracking; ρ > ρmax has reduced ductility and φ < 0.90.
  • For Grade 60 steel (fy = 415 MPa) and f'c = 28 MPa: ρb ≈ 0.0288, ρmax ≈ 0.0183, ρmin ≈ 0.00337.

Definitions

Term

Under-Reinforced Section

Definition

A beam where ρ < ρb (equivalently, εt > εy at failure). The steel yields before the concrete crushes. Failure is gradual and ductile — cracks widen and beam deflects noticeably before collapse. PREFERRED in design.

Importance

Exam problems often ask to 'verify the beam is under-reinforced' — check that ρ < ρmax or εt ≥ 0.005.

Term

Over-Reinforced Section

Definition

A beam where ρ > ρb (equivalently, εt < εy at failure). The concrete crushes before the steel yields. Failure is sudden and brittle — no visible warning. NOT permitted in new designs under NSCP 2015.

Importance

If εt < 0.002, φ = 0.65. If 0.002 ≤ εt ≤ 0.005, φ is linearly interpolated. Board exams may test the effect of over-reinforcement on φ.

Term

Balanced Section

Definition

The theoretical condition where concrete strain reaches εcu = 0.003 simultaneously as steel strain reaches εy = fy/Es at ultimate load. Steel ratio = ρb.

Importance

ρb is a reference benchmark, not a design target. Under NSCP 2015, ρmax = 0.375/0.375+φ... i.e., 0.375×(ρb/0.600×0.600+fy formula) — know the derivation.

Section Title

2. Steel Ratio Limits — NSCP 2015

Common Mistakes

  • Using 0.75ρb as ρmax instead of the NSCP 2015 / ACI 318-14 εt-based limit (0.375 factor). These give slightly different answers — the board exam uses the current code.
  • Taking only 1.4/fy for ρmin without checking √f'c/(4fy) — for higher f'c, the second expression governs.
  • Confusing ρ (steel ratio) with the percentage of steel (ρ% = 100×ρ) — always work with the decimal form in formulas.
  • Not rechecking ρmax after selecting a bar arrangement with more steel than required.

Formulas

Example

b=300, d=500, As=1473 mm², f'c=28, fy=415 → a=85.6mm → c=100.7mm → εt=0.0119>0.005 → φ=0.90 → Mn=279.4kN·m → φMn=251.5kN·m

Formula

Analysis Sequence: a → c → εt → φ → Mn → φMn

Variables

a = Asfy/(0.85f'cb); c = a/β₁; εt = 0.003(d−c)/c; φ = 0.90 if εt ≥ 0.005; Mn = Asfy(d−a/2); φMn = φ·Mn

Application

Standard board-exam analysis procedure — memorize and apply in order.

Exam Tips

  • In a timed board exam, if the problem gives you a standard section with ρ clearly below ρmax, you can state 'section is tension-controlled, φ = 0.90' after a quick check — but show the εt calculation for full credit.
  • Check your answer order of magnitude: φMn for a 300×500 beam with moderate steel is typically 150–300 kN·m. If you get 1500 kN·m, you forgot to divide by 10⁶.

Key Points

  • Analysis means: the beam cross-section is fully defined (b, d, As, f'c, fy are all known) and you must find the design moment capacity φMn.
  • Step 1: Compute the stress block depth a. Step 2: Compute the neutral axis depth c. Step 3: Check εt and determine φ. Step 4: Compute Mn. Step 5: Apply φ.
  • If εt ≥ 0.005: section is tension-controlled, φ = 0.90, proceed directly.
  • If εt < 0.005: section is in the transition or compression-controlled zone; φ < 0.90 and the beam may be over-reinforced (not allowed for new designs).
  • Always verify ρmin ≤ ρ ≤ ρmax as part of a complete analysis.
  • Report the answer as φMn in kN·m (not N·mm or N·m — the board exam uses kN·m for beam moments).

Definitions

Term

Nominal Moment (Mn)

Definition

The theoretical moment capacity computed from equilibrium, without any reduction factor. It represents the actual strength of the section at the point of failure.

Importance

Mn is always the intermediate result; φMn (design strength) is compared to Mu (demand). The board exam may ask for either Mn or φMn — read the question carefully.

Term

Design Moment Capacity (φMn)

Definition

The reliable moment capacity after applying the ACI/NSCP strength reduction factor φ. Must satisfy φMn ≥ Mu (factored moment from structural analysis).

Importance

The fundamental design inequality in USD. φMn = 0.90Mn for tension-controlled sections.

Section Title

3. Analysis Procedure (Given Section → Find φMn)

Common Mistakes

  • Stopping at Mn and not applying φ, or vice versa — know which one is being asked.
  • Computing a in meters instead of mm, leading to errors in subsequent steps.
  • Rounding a to fewer than 2 decimal places too early — carry intermediate results to 4 significant figures.

Formulas

Example

Mu = 200 kN·m = 200×10⁶ N·mm, φ = 0.90, b = 300 mm, d = 450 mm → Rn = 200×10⁶/(0.90×300×450²) = 200×10⁶/54,675,000 = 3.66 MPa

Formula

Rn = Mu / (φ·b·d²)

Variables

Rn = coefficient of resistance (MPa); Mu = factored moment demand (N·mm); φ = 0.90 (assumed tension-controlled); b = beam width (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

First step in the design procedure. Converts the moment demand into a dimensionless resistance coefficient for comparison against material strengths.

Example

Rn = 3.66 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, fy = 415 MPa → ρ = (0.85×28/415)×[1−√(1−2×3.66/(0.85×28))] = 0.05735×[1−√(1−0.3073)] = 0.05735×[1−0.8324] = 0.05735×0.1676 = 0.00961

Formula

ρ = (0.85·f'c/fy)·[1 − √(1 − 2Rn/(0.85·f'c))]

Variables

ρ = required steel ratio; Rn = coefficient of resistance (MPa); f'c = concrete compressive strength (MPa); fy = steel yield strength (MPa)

Application

Quadratic solution for the required steel ratio. Derived from: Mu/φ = Asfy(d−a/2) = ρbd·fy·d·(1−ρfy/(1.7f'c)).

Example

ρ = 0.00961, b = 300 mm, d = 450 mm → As = 0.00961×300×450 = 1,297 mm² → use 3-25mm bars (As = 3×490.9 = 1,473 mm²)

Formula

As = ρ·b·d

Variables

As = required tension steel area (mm²); ρ = required steel ratio; b = beam width (mm); d = effective depth (mm)

Application

Final step to get the required steel area before bar selection.

Exam Tips

  • The term inside the square root [1 − 2Rn/(0.85f'c)] must be positive and ≤ 1.0 — if negative, the beam dimensions are insufficient (Rn too high).
  • For a quick design estimate in the exam, the lever arm is approximately 0.9d for lightly reinforced beams: As ≈ Mu/(φ·fy·0.9d) — useful for checking order of magnitude.
  • After selecting bars, always re-compute a and φMn to confirm φMn ≥ Mu with the actual As — some board problems check if the designed beam is adequate.

Key Points

  • Design means: Mu (factored moment) is known, and you must determine the required As (and select bar sizes).
  • The design is performed assuming tension-controlled (φ = 0.90) — verify after computing As.
  • The Coefficient of Resistance Rn = Mu/(φ·b·d²) consolidates the problem into one dimensionless parameter.
  • The quadratic solution for ρ uses the steel ratio formula derived from setting Mn = As·fy·(d−a/2) equal to Mu/φ.
  • After computing As, always verify: (1) ρmin ≤ ρ ≤ ρmax, (2) εt ≥ 0.005 confirms φ = 0.90 assumption.
  • Select actual bars (from NSCP/PNS standard sizes: 10, 12, 16, 20, 25, 28, 32, 36 mm diameter) with total area ≥ As_required.
  • Standard bar areas (mm²): 10→78.5, 12→113.1, 16→201.1, 20→314.2, 25→490.9, 28→615.8, 32→804.2, 36→1017.9

Definitions

Term

Coefficient of Resistance (Rn)

Definition

The ratio Mu/(φbd²) with units of MPa. It represents the required flexural resistance per unit area of the cross-section. A higher Rn means higher reinforcement demand.

Importance

Key intermediate variable in design. If Rn > Rn,max (corresponding to ρmax), the beam dimensions must be increased or the beam must be designed as doubly reinforced.

Term

Maximum Coefficient of Resistance (Rn,max)

Definition

The value of Rn corresponding to ρ = ρmax. If the required Rn exceeds Rn,max, a singly reinforced section is insufficient.

Importance

Allows a quick check before committing to the full design procedure: if Mu/(φbd²) > Rn,max, go to doubly reinforced or increase beam size.

Section Title

4. Design Procedure (Given Mu → Find As)

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting to convert Mu from kN·m to N·mm (multiply by 10⁶) before computing Rn.
  • Using d² instead of d² in the Rn formula — make sure to square the effective depth, not just multiply.
  • Not checking ρmin after computing ρ — for lightly loaded beams, ρ required may be less than ρmin, requiring As = ρmin·b·d.
  • Selecting bar arrangement with As_provided < As_required due to rounding errors — always verify As_provided ≥ As_required.
  • Not rechecking the tension-controlled assumption after getting the final As.

Formulas

Example

If φMn,max(singly) = 280 kN·m and Mu = 350 kN·m: Mu2 = 350−280 = 70 kN·m → As2 = 70×10⁶/(0.90×415×(500−65)) = 70×10⁶/162,472 = 431 mm²; A's = As2 (if compression steel yields)

Formula

As = As1 + As2 ; As1 = 0.85f'c·β₁·b·(0.375d)/fy ; As2 = Mu2/(φ·fy·(d−d'))

Variables

As1 = steel for singly reinforced couple (at ρmax); As2 = additional steel for compression couple; Mu2 = Mu − φMn1 (excess moment); Mn1 = moment capacity of singly reinforced couple at ρmax; d' = depth to centroid of compression steel

Application

Design procedure for doubly reinforced beams when Mu > φMn,max(singly reinforced).

Example

c = 150 mm, d' = 65 mm → ε's = 0.003×(150−65)/150 = 0.003×0.567 = 0.0017 < εy = 0.00208 → compression steel does NOT yield, use f's = 200,000×0.0017 = 340 MPa

Formula

ε's = 0.003·(c − d') / c

Variables

ε's = strain in compression steel; c = neutral axis depth (mm); d' = depth to compression steel centroid (mm)

Application

Strain compatibility check. Compare with εy = fy/Es. If ε's ≥ εy → compression steel yields → f's = fy. Otherwise f's = Es·ε's.

Exam Tips

  • In many board problems, compression steel is assumed to yield (a simplifying assumption given in the problem) — use this shortcut only when explicitly stated or clearly supported by the strain check.
  • The 'displaced concrete' correction — replacing f's with (f's − 0.85f'c) in the compression steel force — is tested in detailed analysis problems.

Key Points

  • A doubly reinforced beam has BOTH tension steel (As) and compression steel (A's) at effective depths d and d' respectively.
  • Used when: (1) Mu exceeds the maximum singly reinforced capacity (φMn,max) of the given cross-section, (2) sustained loads cause excessive creep deflection and compression steel controls long-term deflection, or (3) reversal of moment occurs (seismic frames).
  • The analysis uses superposition: Pair 1 = singly reinforced couple (As1, b, d, a) + Pair 2 = compression steel couple (As2 = A's, d, d').
  • CRITICAL CHECK: Verify whether compression steel yields (f's = fy) or not. Use strain compatibility: ε's = 0.003(c−d')/c. If ε's ≥ εy = fy/Es (e.g., 415/200,000 = 0.00208 for fy=415), compression steel yields.
  • If compression steel does NOT yield: f's = Es·ε's = 200,000·[0.003(c−d')/c] — use this stress in equilibrium equations, leading to a quadratic in c.
  • NSCP 2015 Section 422.2.2.4.1 requires compression steel to be enclosed by ties (lateral reinforcement) to prevent buckling.

Definitions

Term

Compression Steel (A's)

Definition

Reinforcement placed in the compression zone (near the top fiber in positive moment regions). It supplements the concrete's compression capacity and reduces long-term deflection.

Importance

Its effectiveness depends on whether it yields. The strain compatibility check is always required in board exam doubly reinforced problems.

Section Title

5. Doubly Reinforced Beams

Common Mistakes

  • Assuming compression steel always yields — must check ε's ≥ εy explicitly.
  • Forgetting to account for the concrete displaced by compression steel: effective compression steel force = (f's − 0.85f'c)·A's, not simply f's·A's.
  • Using d' as the concrete cover (e.g., 40 mm) instead of the distance from the compression face to the centroid of A's (e.g., 40+6+14 = 60 mm for a 28mm bar with 40mm cover and 12mm stirrup).

Formulas

Example

As = 2500 mm², fy = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa, bf = 800 mm, tf = 100 mm → a = 2500×415/(0.85×28×800) = 1,037,500/18,960 = 54.7 mm < 100 mm → use rectangular analysis with b = 800 mm ✓

Formula

Check: a = As·fy / (0.85·f'c·bf) — if a ≤ tf → rectangular beam analysis with width bf

Variables

bf = effective flange width; tf = flange (slab) thickness; a = initial stress block depth assuming full flange width

Application

First step in T-beam analysis: determine whether the stress block is contained within the flange.

Example

Detailed T-beam with a > tf: split into flange couple + web couple, compute each Mn contribution separately, then add.

Formula

For a > tf: Asf = 0.85·f'c·(bf−bw)·tf / fy ; Mnf = Asf·fy·(d−tf/2) ; Asw = As − Asf ; Mnw = Asw·fy·(d−aw/2) ; Mn = Mnf + Mnw

Variables

Asf = steel area for flange overhangs; Asw = remaining steel for web rectangle; aw = a for web only = Asw·fy/(0.85·f'c·bw); bw = web width

Application

Full T-beam analysis when stress block extends below the flange.

Exam Tips

  • The board exam T-beam check question: 'Is a ≤ tf?' — compute a assuming the full flange width. If yes, rectangular beam solution applies and the problem becomes straightforward.
  • When a < tf, the T-beam moment capacity is significantly higher than a rectangular beam of width bw — verify your answer is reasonable by comparing to bw analysis.
  • Effective flange width computation is a stand-alone board exam question type — know all three criteria.

Key Points

  • In cast-in-place construction, floor slabs and beams are cast monolithically. The slab acts as a COMPRESSION FLANGE for positive moment, making the beam behave as a T-section.
  • Effective flange width bf is LIMITED by NSCP 2015 Section 406.3 to prevent over-estimation of flange contribution: bf ≤ min(span/4; bw + 16tf; bw + clear spacing to adjacent beam).
  • Key distinction: if the equivalent stress block depth a ≤ tf (flange thickness), the entire compression zone is within the flange — treat as a RECTANGULAR beam of width bf.
  • If a > tf, the compression zone extends into the web — must use the T-beam formulas, splitting the compression zone into flange overhangs and web portions.
  • T-beams are most relevant for POSITIVE moment regions (slab in compression). For NEGATIVE moment (slab in tension), only bw (web width) acts in compression — treat as rectangular beam of width bw.
  • The flange area significantly increases the compression capacity, allowing thinner, more economical webs.

Definitions

Term

Effective Flange Width (bf)

Definition

The width of slab that is considered effective in resisting compression in a T-beam. NSCP 2015 Section 406.3.2 limits bf to the lesser of: (a) span/4, (b) bw + 16tf, (c) bw + clear span to adjacent beam.

Importance

Using the full slab width without applying the NSCP 2015 limits is a common exam trap — always compute bf first.

Term

Isolated T-Beam

Definition

A T-beam that is not part of a continuous floor system — used for independent beams with flanges (e.g., inverted-T retaining wall stems). Special limits apply: tf ≥ bw/2 and bf ≤ 4bw.

Importance

Rare in board exams but appears occasionally in design problems.

Section Title

6. T-Beams

Common Mistakes

  • Applying T-beam formulas to negative moment regions where the slab is in tension (the flange is cracked — only bw resists compression).
  • Using the full slab width as bf without computing the NSCP 2015 effective width limits.
  • Not checking a vs tf first — jumping directly to T-beam formulas when a < tf leads to unnecessary complexity.

Connections

  • NSCP 2015 Section 422 (Flexural Members) provides the code basis for all formulas in this chapter — the equivalent stress block, φ factors, and steel ratio limits all originate from this section.
  • ACI 318-14 is the basis for NSCP 2015's USD provisions; PRC board exams may reference both. The ρmax from εt ≥ 0.005 replaced the older 0.75ρb criterion in ACI 318-02 and NSCP 2001.
  • Load combinations (1.2D + 1.6L, etc.) from NSCP 2015 Section 405.3 (aligned with ASCE 7) determine Mu — the demand side of φMn ≥ Mu. Shear design (Chapter on Shear and Torsion) uses the same beam cross-section and should be checked simultaneously.
  • Deflection control (NSCP 2015 Section 424) is directly related to the moment of inertia of the cracked section, which depends on As — a beam designed for flexure should also be checked for serviceability deflection.
  • Compression steel in doubly reinforced beams must be enclosed by ties per NSCP 2015 Section 422.6 (analogous to column ties) — connects to the column design chapter.
  • T-beam effective flange width connects to slab design: the slab thickness tf that forms the flange must also satisfy NSCP 2015 minimum slab thickness requirements (Section 407).
  • RA 544 (Civil Engineering Law of the Philippines) requires licensed civil engineers to sign and seal structural design computations — beam flexure calculations are among the most fundamental computations covered by this professional responsibility.
  • The balanced strain condition (ρb derivation) uses Es = 200,000 MPa, the standard modulus for Grade 415 (ASTM A615 equivalent) and Grade 60 steel per PNS/ASTM standards.
  • Prestressed concrete beam design (companion chapter) uses the same concepts of equivalent stress block and moment equilibrium, but the initial prestress force modifies the effective stress and strain conditions significantly.

Exam Strategy

In the PRC Civil Engineer Licensure Examination (PSAD component), flexure problems appear in 3–6 questions per exam, typically in the following formats: (1) Straight analysis — given b, d, As, find φMn; always follow the a→c→εt→φ→Mn→φMn sequence and show your work clearly; (2) Design — given Mu, b, d, find As using Rn then ρ formula; always check ρmin ≤ ρ ≤ ρmax; (3) Steel ratio — compute ρb, ρmax, ρmin and classify a given beam; (4) T-beam — check if a ≤ tf first; if yes, solve as rectangular; (5) Doubly reinforced — check compression steel yielding using strain compatibility. Time management: allocate 8–10 minutes per beam problem. Memorize these key values for fy = 415 MPa, f'c = 28 MPa: ρb = 0.0288, ρmax = 0.0183, ρmin = 0.00337, β₁ = 0.85. For f'c = 21 MPa: ρb = 0.0216, ρmax = 0.0137, ρmin = 0.00337. Always convert Mu to N·mm (multiply kN·m by 10⁶) before computing Rn. Common board traps: (a) forgetting the 0.85 factor in the stress block, (b) using h instead of d, (c) skipping the εt check, (d) wrong β₁ for high-strength concrete. The most efficient path on a multiple-choice exam: compute a first — this single calculation lets you find Mn directly and also determine c for the εt check.

Quick Review Questions

A singly reinforced beam has b = 300 mm, d = 500 mm, As = 2,000 mm², f'c = 28 MPa, fy = 415 MPa. Compute φMn.

Step 1: a = 2000×415/(0.85×28×300) = 830,000/7,140 = 116.2 mm. Step 2: β₁ = 0.85 (f'c = 28 MPa); c = 116.2/0.85 = 136.7 mm. Step 3: εt = 0.003×(500−136.7)/136.7 = 0.003×2.657 = 0.00797 > 0.005 → tension-controlled → φ = 0.90. Step 4: Mn = 2000×415×(500−116.2/2) = 830,000×441.9 = 366.8×10⁶ N·mm = 366.8 kN·m. Step 5: φMn = 0.90×366.8 = 330.1 kN·m.

For f'c = 28 MPa and fy = 415 MPa, what is ρmax (NSCP 2015 tension-controlled limit)?

ρmax = 0.85×β₁×(f'c/fy)×0.375 = 0.85×0.85×(28/415)×0.375 = 0.7225×0.06747×0.375 = 0.01828 ≈ 0.0183. The 0.375 factor comes from 0.003/(0.003+0.005) = 3/8, ensuring εt = exactly 0.005 at the limiting strain condition.

What is β₁ for f'c = 35 MPa?

For f'c > 28 MPa: β₁ = 0.85 − 0.05×(f'c − 28)/7 = 0.85 − 0.05×(35−28)/7 = 0.85 − 0.05×1.0 = 0.85 − 0.05 = 0.80. Note: β₁ has a minimum value of 0.65 (at f'c ≥ 56 MPa).

A beam must carry Mu = 180 kN·m. Given b = 250 mm, d = 420 mm, f'c = 21 MPa, fy = 415 MPa. Find the required As.

Step 1: Rn = 180×10⁶/(0.90×250×420²) = 180×10⁶/39,690,000 = 4.536 MPa. Step 2: ρ = (0.85×21/415)×[1−√(1−2×4.536/(0.85×21))] = 0.04301×[1−√(1−0.5081)] = 0.04301×[1−√0.4919] = 0.04301×[1−0.7013] = 0.04301×0.2987 = 0.01285. Step 3: As = 0.01285×250×420 = 1,349 mm². Check: ρmax = 0.85×0.85×(21/415)×0.375 = 0.01372 → ρ = 0.01285 < 0.01372 ✓ tension-controlled. Use 3-25mm bars (As = 1,473 mm²) or 4-22mm bars (As ≈ 1,520 mm²).

What is the purpose of ρmin, and what happens if As < ρmin·b·d?

When a lightly reinforced beam cracks, the tension carried by the concrete is suddenly transferred to the steel. If As is too small, the steel cannot carry this transferred tension and yields immediately — the beam fails without warning. NSCP 2015 Section 409.6.1.1 requires ρmin = max(1.4/fy, √f'c/(4fy)) to prevent this. If the provided As > (4/3)×As_required, the ρmin check may be waived (overprovision of steel covers the safety margin).

A T-beam has bf = 900 mm, tf = 120 mm, bw = 350 mm, d = 560 mm, As = 3,500 mm², f'c = 28 MPa, fy = 415 MPa. Does the stress block stay within the flange?

Assume full flange width for initial check: a = 3500×415/(0.85×28×900) = 1,452,500/21,420 = 67.8 mm. Wait — let me recompute carefully: a = 3500×415/(0.85×28×900) = 1,452,500/21,420 = 67.8 mm < 120 mm → stress block is within the flange → analyze as rectangular beam with b = 900 mm. Mn = 3500×415×(560−67.8/2) = 1,452,500×526.1 = 764.2×10⁶ N·mm = 764.2 kN·m → φMn = 0.90×764.2 = 687.8 kN·m (verify εt first for φ confirmation).

What is the difference between Mn and φMn? Which one is compared to Mu?

In USD (NSCP 2015 / ACI 318), the design inequality is: φMn ≥ Mu, where Mu = factored moment from structural analysis (1.2D + 1.6L loading per NSCP 2015 Section 405.3). The φ factor accounts for variability in material properties, dimensions, and workmanship. φ = 0.90 for tension-controlled flexure (NSCP 2015 Table 421.2.1).

An over-reinforced beam has εt = 0.0015. What is φ and why is this section not permitted in new design?

For εt ≤ 0.002 (compression-controlled zone), NSCP 2015 Table 421.2.1 sets φ = 0.65 for flexure. With εt = 0.0015 < εy = 0.00208 (for fy = 415 MPa), the steel has NOT yielded when the concrete crushes — failure is sudden with no large deflections or wide cracks to warn occupants. NSCP 2015 prohibits designing new beams with ρ > ρmax precisely to avoid this failure mode. The transition zone (0.002 < εt < 0.005) allows φ to increase linearly from 0.65 to 0.90.

Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…

Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?

Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.