CELE Geotechnical Engineering — Soil ClassificationConcept Map
For visual learners attacking the CELE 2026, a Soil Classification concept map is usually worth more than ten pages of linear notes. PRC builds many Soil Classification items around the same handful of relationships — spot them on a map and you recognise them at a glance in the Geotechnical Engineering paper.
Exam context
The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Geotechnical Engineering subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Soil Classification appears in position 2nd of 11 in the CELE Geotechnical Engineering review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.
Soil Classification - Concept Map
Central Concept
Soil Classification Systems and Parameters
Related Concepts
Concept
Grain-Size Distribution
Sub Concepts
- Gradation curve
- Effective size (D₁₀)
- Uniformity coefficient (Cᵤ)
- Coefficient of curvature (Cᶜ)
- Well-graded vs poorly graded
Relationship To Central
Foundation for understanding soil behavior and gradation assessment
Concept
Atterberg Limits and Plasticity
Sub Concepts
- Liquid limit (LL)
- Plastic limit (PL)
- Shrinkage limit (SL)
- Plasticity index (PI)
- Plasticity chart
- A-line classification
Relationship To Central
Defines behavior of fine-grained soils under varying moisture conditions
Concept
USCS (Unified Soil Classification System)
Sub Concepts
- Coarse-grained soils (>50% retained on #200)
- Fine-grained soils (≥50% passing #200)
- Gravel and Sand groups
- Silt, Clay, and Organic groups
- Modifiers: W/P (well/poorly graded), M/C (silty/clayey)
- L/H plasticity division
Relationship To Central
Primary classification system used in engineering practice and board exams
Concept
AASHTO Classification System
Sub Concepts
- Groups A-1 through A-8
- Group index (GI) calculation
- Subgrade quality rating
- Material suitability for highways
- Philippine road design standards
Relationship To Central
Highway-focused classification for subgrade evaluation and engineering design
Concept
Classification Parameters and Criteria
Sub Concepts
- Percent passing #200 sieve
- Percent gravel and sand fractions
- Cᵤ and Cᶜ thresholds for gradation
- LL = 50 boundary for plasticity
- A-line equation: PI = 0.73(LL - 20)
Relationship To Central
Quantitative basis for assigning soil types and predicting behavior
Concept Connections
To
Uniformity Coefficient (Cᵤ)
From
Grain-Size Distribution
Strength
strong
Relationship
Cᵤ is calculated directly from D₆₀ and D₁₀ extracted from gradation curve
To
Well-graded Classification
From
Uniformity Coefficient (Cᵤ)
Strength
strong
Relationship
Cᵤ ≥ 4 (gravel) or ≥ 6 (sand) is first requirement for well-graded soil
To
Well-graded Classification
From
Coefficient of Curvature (Cᶜ)
Strength
strong
Relationship
Cᶜ must be between 1 and 3; second requirement completing well-graded criterion
To
Plasticity Index (PI)
From
Atterberg Limits
Strength
strong
Relationship
PI = LL - PL; fundamental measure of soil plasticity range
To
Plasticity Chart
From
Plasticity Index
Strength
strong
Relationship
PI is y-axis value on chart; defines position relative to A-line for classification
To
Plasticity Chart
From
Liquid Limit (LL)
Strength
strong
Relationship
LL is x-axis value; LL = 50 defines low vs high plasticity boundary
To
Silt vs Clay Distinction
From
A-line Equation
Strength
strong
Relationship
A-line PI = 0.73(LL - 20) separates silt (M, below) from clay (C, above)
To
Coarse-Grained Soils
From
USCS Classification
Strength
strong
Relationship
USCS applies G/S designation and modifiers (W/P, M/C) to >50% retained on #200
To
Fine-Grained Soils
From
USCS Classification
Strength
strong
Relationship
USCS applies M/C/O designation with L/H modifier to ≥50% passing #200
To
Coarse-Grained Modifiers
From
Percent Fines
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Fines percentage determines whether modifier is W/P (< 5%) or M/C (≥ 5%)
To
Group Index (GI)
From
AASHTO Classification
Strength
strong
Relationship
GI formula uses F (% passing #200), LL, and PI to rate subgrade quality
To
Subgrade Quality
From
Group Index Value
Strength
strong
Relationship
Higher GI indicates poorer subgrade; GI 0-1 excellent, GI 10+ very poor
To
USCS Classification
From
Grain-Size Distribution
Strength
strong
Relationship
Grain-size fractions (coarse vs fine) form primary division in USCS system
To
USCS Fine-Grained Classification
From
Atterberg Limits
Strength
strong
Relationship
LL and PI determine M/C type and L/H modifier for fine-grained soils
To
AASHTO Classification
From
USCS Classification
Strength
moderate
Relationship
USCS grouping provides basis for AASHTO highway subgrade rating
To
Permeability Prediction
From
Effective Size (D₁₀)
Strength
moderate
Relationship
D₁₀ influences soil permeability; smaller D₁₀ indicates lower permeability
To
Engineering Behavior Prediction
From
Plasticity Chart Position
Strength
moderate
Relationship
Clay vs silt classification predicts compressibility and shear strength characteristics
Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.