Skip to main content
Concept MapCELE · Geotechnical EngineeringReal content

CELE Geotechnical EngineeringSoil ClassificationConcept Map

For visual learners attacking the CELE 2026, a Soil Classification concept map is usually worth more than ten pages of linear notes. PRC builds many Soil Classification items around the same handful of relationships — spot them on a map and you recognise them at a glance in the Geotechnical Engineering paper.

Exam context

The Civil Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering and is scheduled for May and November 2026. The Geotechnical Engineering subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Soil Classification appears in position 2nd of 11 in the CELE Geotechnical Engineering review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent CELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.

Soil Classification - Concept Map

Central Concept

Soil Classification Systems and Parameters

Related Concepts

Concept

Grain-Size Distribution

Sub Concepts

  • Gradation curve
  • Effective size (D₁₀)
  • Uniformity coefficient (Cᵤ)
  • Coefficient of curvature (Cᶜ)
  • Well-graded vs poorly graded

Relationship To Central

Foundation for understanding soil behavior and gradation assessment

Concept

Atterberg Limits and Plasticity

Sub Concepts

  • Liquid limit (LL)
  • Plastic limit (PL)
  • Shrinkage limit (SL)
  • Plasticity index (PI)
  • Plasticity chart
  • A-line classification

Relationship To Central

Defines behavior of fine-grained soils under varying moisture conditions

Concept

USCS (Unified Soil Classification System)

Sub Concepts

  • Coarse-grained soils (>50% retained on #200)
  • Fine-grained soils (≥50% passing #200)
  • Gravel and Sand groups
  • Silt, Clay, and Organic groups
  • Modifiers: W/P (well/poorly graded), M/C (silty/clayey)
  • L/H plasticity division

Relationship To Central

Primary classification system used in engineering practice and board exams

Concept

AASHTO Classification System

Sub Concepts

  • Groups A-1 through A-8
  • Group index (GI) calculation
  • Subgrade quality rating
  • Material suitability for highways
  • Philippine road design standards

Relationship To Central

Highway-focused classification for subgrade evaluation and engineering design

Concept

Classification Parameters and Criteria

Sub Concepts

  • Percent passing #200 sieve
  • Percent gravel and sand fractions
  • Cᵤ and Cᶜ thresholds for gradation
  • LL = 50 boundary for plasticity
  • A-line equation: PI = 0.73(LL - 20)

Relationship To Central

Quantitative basis for assigning soil types and predicting behavior

Concept Connections

To

Uniformity Coefficient (Cᵤ)

From

Grain-Size Distribution

Strength

strong

Relationship

Cᵤ is calculated directly from D₆₀ and D₁₀ extracted from gradation curve

To

Well-graded Classification

From

Uniformity Coefficient (Cᵤ)

Strength

strong

Relationship

Cᵤ ≥ 4 (gravel) or ≥ 6 (sand) is first requirement for well-graded soil

To

Well-graded Classification

From

Coefficient of Curvature (Cᶜ)

Strength

strong

Relationship

Cᶜ must be between 1 and 3; second requirement completing well-graded criterion

To

Plasticity Index (PI)

From

Atterberg Limits

Strength

strong

Relationship

PI = LL - PL; fundamental measure of soil plasticity range

To

Plasticity Chart

From

Plasticity Index

Strength

strong

Relationship

PI is y-axis value on chart; defines position relative to A-line for classification

To

Plasticity Chart

From

Liquid Limit (LL)

Strength

strong

Relationship

LL is x-axis value; LL = 50 defines low vs high plasticity boundary

To

Silt vs Clay Distinction

From

A-line Equation

Strength

strong

Relationship

A-line PI = 0.73(LL - 20) separates silt (M, below) from clay (C, above)

To

Coarse-Grained Soils

From

USCS Classification

Strength

strong

Relationship

USCS applies G/S designation and modifiers (W/P, M/C) to >50% retained on #200

To

Fine-Grained Soils

From

USCS Classification

Strength

strong

Relationship

USCS applies M/C/O designation with L/H modifier to ≥50% passing #200

To

Coarse-Grained Modifiers

From

Percent Fines

Strength

moderate

Relationship

Fines percentage determines whether modifier is W/P (< 5%) or M/C (≥ 5%)

To

Group Index (GI)

From

AASHTO Classification

Strength

strong

Relationship

GI formula uses F (% passing #200), LL, and PI to rate subgrade quality

To

Subgrade Quality

From

Group Index Value

Strength

strong

Relationship

Higher GI indicates poorer subgrade; GI 0-1 excellent, GI 10+ very poor

To

USCS Classification

From

Grain-Size Distribution

Strength

strong

Relationship

Grain-size fractions (coarse vs fine) form primary division in USCS system

To

USCS Fine-Grained Classification

From

Atterberg Limits

Strength

strong

Relationship

LL and PI determine M/C type and L/H modifier for fine-grained soils

To

AASHTO Classification

From

USCS Classification

Strength

moderate

Relationship

USCS grouping provides basis for AASHTO highway subgrade rating

To

Permeability Prediction

From

Effective Size (D₁₀)

Strength

moderate

Relationship

D₁₀ influences soil permeability; smaller D₁₀ indicates lower permeability

To

Engineering Behavior Prediction

From

Plasticity Chart Position

Strength

moderate

Relationship

Clay vs silt classification predicts compressibility and shear strength characteristics

Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…
Loading diagram…

Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?

Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.