CELE Geotechnical Engineering — Shear Strength of SoilsExam Answer Templates
Shear Strength of Soils answer templates for the CELE 2026. These are the step-by-step approaches that work on Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering's most common question formats in the CELE Geotechnical Engineering subtest. Memorise the structure, practise with real questions, then execute on exam day.
Exam context
Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Civil Engineering runs the Civil Engineer Licensure Examination on May and November 2026. Its Geotechnical Engineering section sits under a "Core" weighting, and Shear Strength of Soils is the 7th chapter in the 11-chapter CELE Geotechnical Engineering rotation. The CELE passing mark is 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%, and the most recent 2026 paper drew about a meaningful share of questions from Geotechnical Engineering.
Shear Strength of Soils - Exam Answer Templates
Proper answer writing is the bridge between knowing the material and earning full marks on the PRC Civil Engineer Licensure Examination. In Geotechnical Engineering, particularly the topic of Shear Strength of Soils, examiners reward structured responses that (1) state the correct formula or principle, (2) substitute values with correct units, and (3) present a logical solution path. A student who knows the correct answer but presents it poorly — omitting units, skipping formula citation, or confusing total and effective stresses — routinely loses 30–50% of available marks. These templates show you exactly how to write answers at every mark level, what phrases examiners specifically look for, and the most common pitfalls that cost Filipino reviewees marks in the board exam.
Templates
State the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for soil in terms of effective stress.
Marks
1
Topic
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion
Difficulty
easy
Template Id
T1
Examiner Tip
The prime notation (') is non-negotiable when effective stress parameters are specified. Examiners are trained to look for it. One missing prime can cost you the entire mark.
Model Answer
The Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion in terms of effective stress is: τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ', where τ_f is the shear stress at failure, c' is the effective cohesion, σ' is the effective normal stress on the failure plane, and φ' is the effective angle of internal friction.
Question Type
very_short_answer
Answer Structure
- Line 1: Write the equation with all symbols defined [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct equation τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ' stated with at least the symbols identified; effective stress notation (prime) must be present.
Common Mark Deductions
- Writing τ = c + σ tan φ without the prime (') notation when effective stress is specifically asked — loses the mark.
- Omitting symbol definitions — some rubrics require at least one symbol defined to award the mark.
- Writing the total stress form when the question says 'effective stress'.
Key Phrases To Include
- τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ'
- effective cohesion c'
- effective angle of internal friction φ'
- effective normal stress σ'
What is the undrained shear strength (cᵤ) of a saturated clay if the unconfined compressive strength qᵤ = 84 kPa?
Marks
1
Topic
Unconfined Compression Test
Difficulty
easy
Template Id
T2
Examiner Tip
This is a guaranteed 1-mark question in almost every board exam cycle. The formula cᵤ = qᵤ/2 must be written — it signals to the examiner that you know the derivation (σ₃ = 0, so the Mohr circle diameter equals qᵤ and the radius equals cᵤ).
Model Answer
Using the relationship for the unconfined compression test: cᵤ = qᵤ / 2 cᵤ = 84 / 2 cᵤ = 42 kPa
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Line 1: State the formula cᵤ = qᵤ/2 [formula mark — 1 mark]
- Line 2: Substitute and solve (answer = 42 kPa)
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct answer of 42 kPa obtained from cᵤ = qᵤ/2; unit (kPa) must be present.
Common Mark Deductions
- Writing cᵤ = qᵤ (i.e., 84 kPa) instead of half — most common error, zero marks.
- Correct value 42 but no unit (kPa) — may lose the mark depending on rubric.
- Confusing qᵤ with the deviator stress in a triaxial test.
Key Phrases To Include
- cᵤ = qᵤ / 2
- 42 kPa
- unconfined compression test
Differentiate between drained and undrained shear strength of clay. (2 marks)
Marks
2
Topic
Drained vs Undrained Shear Strength
Difficulty
easy
Template Id
T3
Examiner Tip
In a 'differentiate' question, always present both sides in parallel. Examiners allocate one mark per side. Frame each with: condition → parameter used → governing scenario.
Model Answer
Undrained shear strength (cᵤ) applies when loading is rapid and excess pore-water pressures cannot dissipate; for saturated clay, φ = 0 and strength = cᵤ. This governs short-term stability (e.g., immediately after embankment construction). Drained shear strength is defined by effective parameters c' and φ', applicable when pore pressures have fully dissipated; it governs long-term stability. Since sands drain rapidly, they are always analysed using drained (effective stress) parameters.
Question Type
short_answer
Answer Structure
- Sentence 1: Define undrained condition and state φ = 0, give short-term example [1 mark]
- Sentence 2: Define drained condition, state effective parameters c' and φ', give long-term example [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct description of undrained: rapid loading, excess pore pressure not dissipated, φ = 0, short-term stability.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct description of drained: pore pressures dissipated, effective parameters c' and φ', long-term stability.
Common Mark Deductions
- Describing only one condition instead of both — loses 1 mark.
- Saying 'undrained means no water' — conceptually wrong, loses the mark.
- Not mentioning pore pressure behavior — examiners specifically look for this.
- Omitting the φ = 0 condition for undrained saturated clay.
Key Phrases To Include
- excess pore-water pressure
- φ = 0 for saturated undrained clay
- effective parameters c' and φ'
- short-term stability
- long-term stability
A direct shear test on a soil sample gives the following data: Normal stress = 120 kPa, Shear stress at failure = 82 kPa. A second test gives: Normal stress = 240 kPa, Shear stress at failure = 134 kPa. Determine the cohesion c and angle of internal friction φ. (2 marks)
Marks
2
Topic
Direct Shear Test
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T4
Examiner Tip
The simultaneous equation approach is the cleanest and most mark-safe method for direct shear data. Always show the subtraction step explicitly — it demonstrates method clearly to the examiner.
Model Answer
Using the Mohr-Coulomb equation τ_f = c + σ tan φ: Test 1: 82 = c + 120 tan φ ... (1) Test 2: 134 = c + 240 tan φ ... (2) Subtracting (1) from (2): 52 = 120 tan φ tan φ = 52/120 = 0.4333 φ = arctan(0.4333) = 23.4° Substituting into (1): c = 82 − 120(0.4333) = 82 − 52 = 30 kPa Therefore: c = 30 kPa, φ = 23.4°
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Write Mohr-Coulomb equation and set up two simultaneous equations [½ mark]
- Step 2: Solve for tan φ by subtraction, find φ [½ mark]
- Step 3: Back-substitute to find c [½ mark]
- Step 4: State final answers with units and degrees [½ mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct setup of two simultaneous Mohr-Coulomb equations and correct method of solution.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct final answers: c = 30 kPa and φ = 23.4° (±0.5°) with units.
Common Mark Deductions
- Setting up equations correctly but arithmetic error in subtraction — loses 1 mark.
- Finding tan φ but forgetting to take arctan — reports tan φ as the angle.
- Not writing units for c (kPa) or not writing degree symbol for φ.
- Using only one data point and assuming c = 0 without justification.
Key Phrases To Include
- τ_f = c + σ tan φ
- simultaneous equations
- tan φ = 0.4333
- c = 30 kPa
- φ = 23.4°
A consolidated-drained (CD) triaxial test on a sand sample (c = 0) shows failure at σ₃ = 150 kPa with a deviator stress (σ₁ − σ₃) = 300 kPa. Calculate the angle of internal friction φ. (2 marks)
Marks
2
Topic
Triaxial Test — Friction Angle
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T5
Examiner Tip
The step 'σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator stress' is critical and earns its own mark in many rubrics. Never skip it. Write it as the very first computational line.
Model Answer
Given: σ₃ = 150 kPa, deviator stress = 300 kPa σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator = 150 + 300 = 450 kPa For c = 0 sand, using: sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃) / (σ₁ + σ₃) sin φ = (450 − 150) / (450 + 150) sin φ = 300 / 600 = 0.500 φ = arcsin(0.500) = 30°
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Compute σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator stress [½ mark]
- Step 2: Write the sin φ formula for c = 0 [½ mark]
- Step 3: Substitute and solve sin φ [½ mark]
- Step 4: Compute φ = 30° [½ mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct identification of σ₁ = 450 kPa and correct formula sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct final answer φ = 30° with degree symbol.
Common Mark Deductions
- Using the deviator stress directly as σ₁ without adding σ₃ — most frequent board exam error.
- Applying the c ≠ 0 formula unnecessarily when the problem states c = 0 sand.
- Reporting sin φ = 0.5 as the final answer instead of taking arcsin.
- Wrong formula: using cos instead of sin.
Key Phrases To Include
- σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator stress
- sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃)
- c = 0 (sand)
- φ = 30°
Find the shear strength on a failure plane where the effective normal stress σ' = 180 kPa for a soil with c' = 25 kPa and φ' = 28°. (2 marks)
Marks
2
Topic
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion
Difficulty
easy
Template Id
T6
Examiner Tip
Always write tan 28° = 0.5317 explicitly — it shows you computed it correctly. Examiners appreciate this transparency and it protects your method mark even if there is a minor arithmetic slip.
Model Answer
Applying the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion (effective stress form): τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ' τ_f = 25 + 180 × tan 28° τ_f = 25 + 180 × 0.5317 τ_f = 25 + 95.7 τ_f = 120.7 kPa
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Line 1: Write τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ' (formula mark) [1 mark]
- Line 2: Substitute values and compute; state final answer with units [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct formula τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ' cited with effective stress notation.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct substitution and answer ≈ 120.7 kPa (accept 120 to 121 kPa depending on rounding of tan 28°).
Common Mark Deductions
- Using tan⁻¹ (arctan) instead of tan — misreading the formula direction.
- Omitting the unit kPa in the final answer.
- Using total stress parameters when effective stress parameters are given.
- Rounding tan 28° to 0.5 (tan 30°) without acknowledgment — introduces significant error.
Key Phrases To Include
- τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ'
- tan 28° = 0.5317
- 120.7 kPa
Describe the Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) triaxial test and state the drainage condition and the soil parameters it yields. (3 marks)
Marks
3
Topic
Triaxial Test — UU Condition
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T7
Examiner Tip
Structure your 3-mark answer in exactly three parts: (1) what happens in the test, (2) what you get from it, (3) when you use it. This maps directly onto the 3-mark rubric every time.
Model Answer
In the Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) triaxial test, the soil sample is NOT allowed to consolidate under the confining pressure σ₃, and drainage is prevented throughout both the consolidation stage and the shear stage. Because excess pore pressures are not allowed to dissipate, the measured strength is in terms of total stress. For a saturated clay tested under UU conditions, all Mohr circles (at different confining pressures) have the same diameter, yielding a horizontal failure envelope. This gives: • Undrained shear strength: cᵤ (total cohesion) • Friction angle: φ = 0° (φᵤ = 0) The UU test is used to evaluate the short-term, immediate stability of clay foundations and embankments, where rapid loading prevents pore pressure dissipation.
Question Type
short_answer
Answer Structure
- Paragraph 1: Describe the test procedure — no drainage during consolidation and shear, total stress analysis [1 mark]
- Paragraph 2: State parameters yielded — cᵤ and φ = 0; mention horizontal envelope for saturated clay [1 mark]
- Paragraph 3: State the practical application — short-term stability of clays [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct description: no drainage in either stage; excess pore pressures not dissipated; total stress analysis.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct parameters: cᵤ and φ = 0° for saturated clay; Mohr circles of equal diameter / horizontal envelope.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct application: short-term or immediate stability analysis of clay embankments, foundations, or cuts.
Common Mark Deductions
- Confusing UU with CU — stating that consolidation is allowed loses the first mark.
- Saying φ = 0 but not explaining why (horizontal envelope from equal-diameter Mohr circles) — partial mark only.
- Not mentioning any practical application — loses the third mark.
- Using effective stress notation c' and φ' for UU results — conceptual error.
Key Phrases To Include
- no drainage / drainage valve closed
- total stress parameters
- φ = 0° (or φᵤ = 0)
- undrained shear strength cᵤ
- short-term stability
- horizontal failure envelope
Three direct shear tests on a clay soil yield the following results: Test 1: σ = 50 kPa, τ_f = 52 kPa Test 2: σ = 100 kPa, τ_f = 70 kPa Test 3: σ = 200 kPa, τ_f = 104 kPa Determine the cohesion c and angle of internal friction φ for this soil. (3 marks)
Marks
3
Topic
Direct Shear Test
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T8
Examiner Tip
When three data points are given, always verify your answer with the unused third point. This earns the verification mark and shows confidence. It typically takes only 10 seconds but signals a thorough exam response.
Model Answer
Using τ_f = c + σ tan φ, set up simultaneous equations from Tests 1 and 3 (widest range for accuracy): Test 1: 52 = c + 50 tan φ ... (1) Test 3: 104 = c + 200 tan φ ... (2) Subtracting (1) from (2): 52 = 150 tan φ tan φ = 52/150 = 0.3467 φ = arctan(0.3467) ≈ 19.1° Substituting into (1): c = 52 − 50(0.3467) = 52 − 17.3 = 34.7 kPa ≈ 35 kPa Verification with Test 2: τ_f = 35 + 100(0.3467) = 35 + 34.7 = 69.7 kPa ≈ 70 kPa ✓ Therefore: c ≈ 35 kPa, φ ≈ 19.1°
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Write Mohr-Coulomb equation and select two test points; set up simultaneous equations [1 mark]
- Step 2: Solve for tan φ → φ [1 mark]
- Step 3: Solve for c; verify with third data point; state answers with units [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct Mohr-Coulomb equation cited; two simultaneous equations correctly written.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct tan φ calculation and φ = 19.1° (accept ±0.5°).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct c ≈ 35 kPa with unit; verification step shown OR consistent answer with all three tests.
Common Mark Deductions
- Using only two points and not attempting verification — loses 1 mark if three data points are given.
- Arithmetic error in subtraction — loses up to 2 marks (downstream effect).
- Not writing c in kPa.
- Selecting adjacent tests (1 and 2) with a narrow stress range — introduces larger rounding error, may yield slightly off answers.
Key Phrases To Include
- τ_f = c + σ tan φ
- simultaneous equations
- tan φ = 0.3467
- φ ≈ 19.1°
- c ≈ 35 kPa
- verification
Explain the significance of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion in geotechnical engineering and derive the relationship between principal stresses at failure for a cohesionless soil. (3 marks)
Marks
3
Topic
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T9
Examiner Tip
For 'explain and derive' questions, always lead with the engineering significance before the mathematics. Examiners who read quickly look for engineering judgment first, then verify the math. The significance mark is the easiest to earn.
Model Answer
The Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion defines the limiting condition of stress in a soil mass: failure occurs on any plane where τ_f = c + σ tan φ. It is fundamental to the design of foundations, retaining walls, and slopes, as it provides the boundary between stable and unstable stress states. For a cohesionless soil (c = 0), the failure envelope passes through the origin: τ_f = σ tan φ. At failure, the Mohr circle is tangent to this envelope. Using Mohr circle geometry, the relationship between principal stresses is derived as: sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃) / (σ₁ + σ₃) Rearranging to express σ₁ in terms of σ₃: σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) This relationship is used directly in triaxial test analysis to determine φ from measured principal stresses at failure.
Question Type
short_answer
Answer Structure
- Paragraph 1: Significance of Mohr-Coulomb in geotechnical design [1 mark]
- Paragraph 2: State the c = 0 simplification; derive or state sin φ formula from Mohr circle geometry [1 mark]
- Paragraph 3: Express σ₁ in terms of σ₃; state practical use [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Clear statement of significance: defines failure condition; used in foundation, slope, retaining wall design.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct formula sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃) for c = 0, with logical derivation or reference to Mohr circle.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct expression σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) and statement of application in triaxial test.
Common Mark Deductions
- Not mentioning that failure occurs when the Mohr circle is tangent to the failure envelope — loses derivation mark.
- Writing the formula for c ≠ 0 when c = 0 is specified — formula contains extra term, suggesting confusion.
- Omitting practical applications in geotechnical design — loses significance mark.
- Errors in the tan²(45 + φ/2) expression — common if derived from memory without checking.
Key Phrases To Include
- τ_f = c + σ tan φ
- failure envelope
- Mohr circle tangent to failure envelope
- sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃)
- σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2)
- cohesionless (c = 0)
An unconfined compression test on a saturated clay specimen gives a failure load of 180 N on a specimen with diameter 38 mm and height 76 mm. Determine: (a) the unconfined compressive strength qᵤ, and (b) the undrained shear strength cᵤ. Assume no area correction. (3 marks)
Marks
3
Topic
Unconfined Compression Test
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T10
Examiner Tip
Unit consistency is the number one source of errors in this type of problem. The safest approach: convert everything to kN and m before any calculation. 180 N = 0.180 kN; A in m²; result in kPa. Do it in one consistent system.
Model Answer
Given: Failure load P = 180 N, diameter d = 38 mm, height H = 76 mm (a) Cross-sectional area: A = π d² / 4 = π (0.038)² / 4 = 1.134 × 10⁻³ m² Unconfined compressive strength: qᵤ = P / A = 180 / (1.134 × 10⁻³) = 158,730 Pa ≈ 158.7 kPa (b) Undrained shear strength: cᵤ = qᵤ / 2 = 158.7 / 2 ≈ 79.4 kPa Note: In the UU condition, φ = 0, so the Mohr circle has diameter = qᵤ and radius = cᵤ.
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Compute cross-sectional area in m² [1 mark]
- Step 2: Compute qᵤ = P/A in kPa with correct unit conversion [1 mark]
- Step 3: Apply cᵤ = qᵤ/2; state φ = 0 condition [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct area A = 1.134 × 10⁻³ m² (accept equivalent in mm² if consistent units used).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct qᵤ ≈ 158.7 kPa with unit conversion N → kN or Pa → kPa shown.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct cᵤ ≈ 79.4 kPa from cᵤ = qᵤ/2; statement of φ = 0 for undrained clay.
Common Mark Deductions
- Using diameter instead of radius in area formula — A = πr² instead of πd²/4 — very common error.
- Forgetting to convert N to kN before dividing by m², yielding answer in Pa not kPa.
- Using area in mm² and load in N, giving qᵤ in MPa — unit inconsistency.
- Computing cᵤ = qᵤ (not halving) — most penalized conceptual error.
Key Phrases To Include
- A = πd²/4
- qᵤ = P/A
- unit conversion: N/m² = Pa → kPa
- cᵤ = qᵤ/2
- φ = 0 (undrained saturated clay)
Two CU triaxial tests on a saturated clay give the following failure stresses: Test 1: σ₃ = 100 kPa, σ₁ = 220 kPa Test 2: σ₃ = 200 kPa, σ₁ = 380 kPa Determine the total stress shear strength parameters c and φ for the clay. (5 marks)
Marks
5
Topic
Triaxial Test — CU Condition
Difficulty
hard
Template Id
T11
Examiner Tip
For any problem with two or more Mohr circles, the key formula is sin φ = ΔR/ΔC (change in radius over change in center). This is derived from the geometry of two circles with a common external tangent. Master this — it appears in almost every board exam CU/CD triaxial problem with c ≠ 0.
Model Answer
Step 1 — Identify principal stresses and compute Mohr circle parameters: For each test, center of Mohr circle = (σ₁ + σ₃)/2, radius = (σ₁ − σ₃)/2 Test 1: Center₁ = (220 + 100)/2 = 160 kPa; Radius₁ = (220 − 100)/2 = 60 kPa Test 2: Center₂ = (380 + 200)/2 = 290 kPa; Radius₂ = (380 − 200)/2 = 90 kPa Step 2 — Determine φ from the slope of the common tangent: sin φ = (R₂ − R₁) / (C₂ − C₁) = (90 − 60) / (290 − 160) = 30 / 130 = 0.2308 φ = arcsin(0.2308) = 13.3° Step 3 — Determine c from the failure envelope intercept: The distance from origin to the tangent line along the τ-axis: c cos φ = R₁ − C₁ sin φ c cos φ = 60 − 160 × 0.2308 = 60 − 36.9 = 23.1 c = 23.1 / cos(13.3°) = 23.1 / 0.9730 = 23.7 kPa ≈ 24 kPa Step 4 — Verify with Test 2: c cos φ = 90 − 290 × 0.2308 = 90 − 66.9 = 23.1 ✓ (consistent) Step 5 — State final results: c ≈ 24 kPa (total stress cohesion) φ ≈ 13.3° (total stress friction angle) Note: These are total stress parameters from CU test. For effective stress parameters, pore pressure measurements at failure would be required.
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Compute center and radius of both Mohr circles [1 mark]
- Step 2: Apply sin φ = ΔR/ΔC formula and solve for φ [1 mark]
- Step 3: Apply intercept formula to find c [1 mark]
- Step 4: Verify consistency with both circles [1 mark]
- Step 5: State final c and φ with units; note total vs effective distinction [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct computation of both Mohr circle centers (160 kPa, 290 kPa) and radii (60 kPa, 90 kPa).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct formula sin φ = ΔR/ΔC and correct φ = 13.3° (accept ±0.5°).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct intercept formula and c ≈ 24 kPa (accept 23–25 kPa).
Marks
1
Criteria
Verification step shown with consistent result for both tests.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct final answer with units and note that these are total stress (CU) parameters.
Common Mark Deductions
- Using sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃) directly — valid only for c = 0 sand; wrong for c ≠ 0 clay.
- Not computing the circle center and radius — attempting to apply formulas without these intermediate values.
- Skipping the verification step — loses 1 mark even if answer is correct.
- Not noting that CU gives total stress parameters (without pore pressure) — loses the final commentary mark.
- Confusing deviator stress with σ₁ (not adding σ₃).
Key Phrases To Include
- center = (σ₁ + σ₃)/2
- radius = (σ₁ − σ₃)/2
- sin φ = ΔR / ΔC
- c cos φ = R − C sin φ
- total stress parameters
- CU test
- c ≈ 24 kPa
- φ ≈ 13.3°
A saturated clay deposit is to be loaded by a rapid embankment fill. Discuss: (a) which triaxial test type is most appropriate for the stability analysis, (b) what shear strength parameters result, and (c) how long-term stability should be reassessed. (5 marks)
Marks
5
Topic
Drained vs Undrained — Engineering Application
Difficulty
hard
Template Id
T12
Examiner Tip
This is a classic 'design judgment' question. Examiners at PRC level reward students who not only know the formulas but can explain the engineering reasoning behind test selection. Structure your answer in labeled parts (a), (b), (c) — this tells the examiner exactly where to award each mark.
Model Answer
(a) Appropriate Test Type — UU Triaxial Test: For rapid embankment construction on saturated clay, the Unconsolidated-Undrained (UU) triaxial test is the appropriate test. Rapid loading means that excess pore water pressures generated during loading cannot dissipate before the critical stability condition is reached. The drainage condition in the UU test (valves closed throughout) simulates this field condition. (b) Shear Strength Parameters — Undrained Condition: From the UU test on saturated clay: • Failure envelope is horizontal → φ = 0° (φᵤ = 0) • Intercept gives the undrained shear strength: sᵤ = cᵤ • All Mohr circles at different σ₃ values have equal diameters (pore pressures change exactly to neutralize confining pressure change) The undrained stability is checked using: τ_f = cᵤ (φ = 0 analysis) This is also equivalent to: cᵤ = qᵤ/2 if an unconfined compression test is used. (c) Long-Term Stability Reassessment — Drained Condition: Over time, excess pore pressures dissipate and the clay consolidates. Long-term (drained) stability must be assessed using effective stress parameters c' and φ' obtained from either: • Consolidated-Drained (CD) triaxial test, or • Consolidated-Undrained (CU) triaxial test with pore pressure measurement. The long-term analysis uses: τ_f = c' + σ' tan φ' For overconsolidated clays, special attention must be given to the possibility of negative pore pressures (suction) in the short term, which may make the long-term (drained) condition more critical. This is the scenario that has led to delayed failures in clay embankments and cuts worldwide. Conclusion: Short-term → UU test → φ = 0, use cᵤ. Long-term → CD or CU test → use c', φ' with effective stresses.
Question Type
long_answer
Answer Structure
- Part (a): Identify UU test; explain why (rapid loading, no drainage time) — [1 mark for test type + 1 mark for reasoning]
- Part (b): State φ = 0, cᵤ; explain equal-diameter Mohr circles for saturated clay — [1 mark]
- Part (c): Describe drained reassessment using CD or CU; cite effective parameters c' and φ'; mention overconsolidated clay risk — [2 marks]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct identification of UU test as appropriate for rapid loading on saturated clay.
Marks
1
Criteria
Clear engineering reasoning: rapid loading → no drainage → undrained field condition.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct parameters: φ = 0, sᵤ = cᵤ; explanation of equal Mohr circle diameters for saturated clay.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct long-term approach: CD or CU test with pore pressure measurement; effective parameters c' and φ'.
Marks
1
Criteria
Discussion of overconsolidated clay risk (delayed failure / drained condition may govern) OR clear conclusion statement comparing short vs long term.
Common Mark Deductions
- Recommending CU or CD for rapid loading — incorrect reasoning, loses both test-type marks.
- Stating φ = 0 without explaining WHY (equal pore pressure response for saturated clay) — partial mark.
- Not distinguishing between total and effective stress parameters for short vs long term — loses up to 2 marks.
- No mention of the long-term drained reassessment — loses the final 2 marks entirely.
- Vague conclusion without specifying which parameters to use in each scenario.
Key Phrases To Include
- UU triaxial test
- rapid loading / no time to drain
- φ = 0 analysis
- undrained shear strength cᵤ
- equal Mohr circle diameters
- long-term drained condition
- effective parameters c' and φ'
- CD or CU test with pore pressure
- overconsolidated clay / delayed failure
State the principal stress relationship at failure for a c-φ soil in a triaxial test. (1 mark)
Marks
1
Topic
Mohr-Coulomb — Principal Stress Relationship
Difficulty
medium
Template Id
T13
Examiner Tip
Memorize the full expression. The 2c tan(45 + φ/2) term is algebraically identical to 2c√Kₚ where Kₚ is the Rankine passive pressure coefficient — useful cross-check between topics.
Model Answer
At failure in a triaxial test for a c-φ soil: σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) + 2c tan(45 + φ/2)
Question Type
very_short_answer
Answer Structure
- Line 1: Write the complete formula with both terms [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Complete formula σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) + 2c tan(45 + φ/2) stated correctly; both terms present.
Common Mark Deductions
- Writing only σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) — missing the 2c term; loses the mark.
- Writing tan(45 − φ/2) instead of tan(45 + φ/2) — sign error, common confusion with active earth pressure.
- Leaving out the '2' coefficient on the cohesion term.
Key Phrases To Include
- σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ/2) + 2c tan(45 + φ/2)
- Rankine active/passive coefficient
- both terms (σ₃ term and cohesion term)
Compare the Consolidated-Undrained (CU) and Consolidated-Drained (CD) triaxial tests with respect to: drainage conditions, parameters obtained, and appropriate application. (5 marks)
Marks
5
Topic
Triaxial Test — CU vs CD
Difficulty
hard
Template Id
T14
Examiner Tip
For comparison questions at 5 marks, use numbered sections or a clear structure. Examiners allocate marks to specific points; a wall of paragraph text makes it hard for them to find your marks. Use headers or numbered points.
Model Answer
1. Drainage Conditions: In the CU test, the sample is first consolidated (drained) under the confining pressure σ₃ — drainage is allowed until excess pore pressures fully dissipate. During the shear stage, drainage is closed. If pore pressures are measured during shear, effective stress parameters can be calculated. In the CD test, drainage is allowed throughout — both during consolidation and during shearing. Shearing must be done very slowly to prevent pore pressure build-up. This is impractical for clays (may take days) but straightforward for sands. 2. Parameters Obtained: CU test (without pore pressure): Total stress parameters — c and φ (total) CU test (with pore pressure measurement): Both total AND effective parameters — c, φ (total) and c', φ' (effective) CD test: Directly yields effective parameters — c' and φ'; no pore pressure measurement needed since Δu = 0 throughout. 3. Appropriate Application: CU test: Used when it is necessary to model the situation where the soil has been consolidated under one stress state and then subjected to rapid undrained loading — for example, staged embankment construction, or rapid drawdown in an earth dam. Also used when both total and effective parameters are needed from one test. CD test: Used for slowly drained materials (gravels, sands, silts) or for long-term stability analysis of drained clay slopes. The CD test is the most fundamental effective stress test because pore pressure is zero throughout shear. 4. Key Difference: CD gives c' and φ' directly. CU with pore pressure also gives c' and φ', but requires a pore pressure transducer. For most practical purposes, c'(CU) ≈ c'(CD) and φ'(CU) ≈ φ'(CD) for the same soil. 5. Summary Table: • CU: Consolidated → undrained shear → total c,φ (and effective if Δu measured) • CD: Consolidated → drained shear → effective c', φ' directly
Question Type
long_answer
Answer Structure
- Section 1: Drainage conditions for CU and CD during consolidation and shear stages [1 mark]
- Section 2: Parameters from CU (with and without pore pressure) [1 mark]
- Section 3: Parameters from CD [1 mark]
- Section 4: Engineering applications of CU [1 mark]
- Section 5: Engineering applications of CD; comparison conclusion [1 mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct drainage conditions: CU — consolidated (drained), sheared (undrained); CD — drained throughout.
Marks
1
Criteria
CU yields total c, φ (and effective c', φ' if pore pressure measured); distinction between with/without Δu measurement.
Marks
1
Criteria
CD yields effective c' and φ' directly; slow shear rate required; Δu = 0 throughout.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct CU application: rapid undrained loading of consolidated soil; staged construction; rapid drawdown.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct CD application: sands, long-term clay analysis; comparison conclusion; summary statement.
Common Mark Deductions
- Stating that CU test has no consolidation stage — fundamental error, loses first mark.
- Stating that CD gives total stress parameters — wrong, CD gives effective; loses up to 2 marks.
- Not mentioning pore pressure measurement as the condition for obtaining effective parameters from CU.
- No engineering application examples — loses 2 marks for application sections.
- Confusing rapid drawdown application (CU) with long-term drained analysis (CD).
Key Phrases To Include
- consolidated under σ₃ with drainage
- shear with drainage closed (CU)
- shear with drainage open (CD)
- pore pressure measurement
- total stress parameters c, φ
- effective parameters c', φ'
- staged construction / rapid drawdown
- slow shear rate for CD
- Δu = 0 in CD
A CD triaxial test on a c-φ soil gives: σ₃ = 100 kPa, deviator stress at failure = 280 kPa, c' = 15 kPa. Find φ'. (3 marks)
Marks
3
Topic
Triaxial Test — c-φ Soil
Difficulty
hard
Template Id
T15
Examiner Tip
This is the most algebraically demanding shear strength problem type. The key insight is that σ₁ = σ₃ Nφ + 2c'√Nφ creates a quadratic in √Nφ. Substitute x = √Nφ to get a standard form quadratic. Show this substitution explicitly — it earns the quadratic setup mark even if arithmetic goes slightly astray.
Model Answer
Step 1 — Determine principal stresses: σ₃ = 100 kPa σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator = 100 + 280 = 380 kPa Step 2 — Apply principal stress failure relationship: σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ'/2) + 2c' tan(45 + φ'/2) Let N_φ = tan²(45 + φ'/2) and note 2c'tan(45 + φ'/2) = 2c'√N_φ 380 = 100 N_φ + 2(15)√N_φ 380 = 100 N_φ + 30√N_φ Step 3 — Let x = √N_φ: 100x² + 30x − 380 = 0 Using the quadratic formula: x = [−30 ± √(900 + 4×100×380)] / (2×100) x = [−30 ± √(900 + 152000)] / 200 x = [−30 ± √152900] / 200 x = [−30 ± 391.0] / 200 Taking positive root: x = 361/200 = 1.805 N_φ = x² = (1.805)² = 3.258 tan²(45 + φ'/2) = 3.258 tan(45 + φ'/2) = √3.258 = 1.805 45 + φ'/2 = arctan(1.805) = 61.0° φ'/2 = 16.0° φ' = 32.0° Verification: σ₁ = 100(3.258) + 2(15)(1.805) = 325.8 + 54.2 = 380 kPa ✓
Question Type
numerical
Answer Structure
- Step 1: Compute σ₁ = 380 kPa [½ mark]
- Step 2: Write principal stress failure formula for c-φ soil [1 mark]
- Step 3: Solve the quadratic (substitution x = √N_φ) for N_φ [1 mark]
- Step 4: Compute φ' = 32° and verify [½ mark]
Scoring Breakdown
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct σ₁ = 380 kPa and correct formula σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ'/2) + 2c' tan(45 + φ'/2).
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct quadratic setup (100x² + 30x − 380 = 0) and valid method of solution.
Marks
1
Criteria
Correct final answer φ' = 32° (accept ±1°) with verification.
Common Mark Deductions
- Using the c = 0 formula sin φ = (σ₁ − σ₃)/(σ₁ + σ₃) when c' = 15 kPa is given — wrong formula, may lose all 3 marks.
- Not computing σ₁ first and using 280 kPa as σ₁.
- Setting up the equation correctly but using linear approximation instead of solving the quadratic.
- Correct x = 1.805 but not squaring to get N_φ before extracting the angle.
Key Phrases To Include
- σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator
- σ₁ = σ₃ tan²(45 + φ'/2) + 2c' tan(45 + φ'/2)
- let x = √N_φ (substitution)
- quadratic formula
- φ' = 32°
- verification
Mark Wise Strategy
Dos
- Write the formula or definition in one clean line
- Include units even for 1-mark numerical answers
- Use correct notation: prime (') for effective stress, subscript u for undrained
- If it is a formula recall question, state both LHS and RHS of the equation
Donts
- Do not write lengthy introductions ('The Mohr-Coulomb criterion is a very important concept…')
- Do not omit units from numerical answers
- Do not confuse total and effective stress notation
- Do not write multiple alternative formulas hoping one is correct — pick the right one
Marks
1
Strategy
State the exact formula, definition, or value directly. No preamble, no explanation unless specifically asked. Every word must add value — examiners scanning 1-mark answers reward precision, not length.
Expected Length
1–2 lines maximum
Time Allocation
1–2 minutes
Dos
- Write formula on a dedicated line before substituting
- Show intermediate calculations (e.g., tan 28° = 0.5317)
- For differentiation questions, present both sides in parallel structure
- Box or underline the final answer
Donts
- Do not skip the formula step to save time — that step is a mark
- Do not present two separate ideas in one run-on sentence for a differentiation question
- Do not round tan or sin values to convenient numbers (e.g., tan 30° = 0.577 is fine; tan 28° ≠ 0.5)
- Do not omit degree symbol on angle answers
Marks
2
Strategy
For numerical problems: Formula → Substitution → Answer. For conceptual questions: Point 1 (with reason) → Point 2 (with reason). Each line should logically earn one mark. Show all substituted values explicitly.
Expected Length
3–5 lines or 2 clear steps
Time Allocation
3–5 minutes
Dos
- Number your steps or use clear paragraph breaks
- Include a verification step for 3-mark numerical problems — it shows confidence and earns the third mark
- For test-type questions, cover: what the test does, what it gives, when to use it
- State any assumptions (e.g., saturated clay, c = 0) explicitly
Donts
- Do not write one long paragraph — examiners cannot easily identify your three marks
- Do not skip the verification/check step in multi-data numerical problems
- Do not use undefined abbreviations (write 'UU triaxial test' not just 'UU' without introduction)
- Do not mix total and effective parameters in the same equation
Marks
3
Strategy
Structure your answer into exactly three distinct sections matching the three marks. For numerical: Step 1 (setup/formula), Step 2 (calculation), Step 3 (result + verification or note). For descriptive: Definition, Explanation, Application.
Expected Length
6–10 lines; 3 clearly distinguishable steps or paragraphs
Time Allocation
6–10 minutes
Dos
- Use headings or numbered sections to organize your answer
- Show all formula citations explicitly
- Show all intermediate values with units
- Include a concluding statement that ties back to the question
- For multi-Mohr-circle problems, calculate circle centers and radii as the first step
- For comparison questions, create parallel structure for each item being compared
Donts
- Do not write prose for numerical problems — use structured step-by-step format
- Do not omit the pore pressure / drainage discussion in any drainage condition question
- Do not jump to the answer without showing all intermediate steps
- Do not use the c = 0 formula when c is given in the problem
- Do not skip the verification step — in a 5-mark numerical, verification is typically worth 1 mark
Marks
5
Strategy
Treat a 5-mark question as five 1-mark sub-questions that you must answer within a coherent response. Use numbered sections, labeled parts (a), (b), (c), or clear headings. Show complete solution paths. Always end with a conclusion or verification. For engineering application questions, demonstrate judgment (which test, why, what parameters, when to use them).
Expected Length
15–25 lines; 4–5 distinct sections or paragraphs
Time Allocation
12–18 minutes
General Answer Writing Tips
- Always write the governing formula first before substituting numbers — examiners award a dedicated 'formula mark' even if your arithmetic is wrong.
- Distinguish clearly between total stress parameters (c, φ) and effective stress parameters (c', φ') — mixing them is the single most penalized error in shear strength problems.
- For numerical problems, always include units in every step; a correct numerical answer without units (kPa, degrees, kN/m²) earns zero in most PRC-style rubrics.
- When the question asks you to 'state' or 'define', use the exact Mohr-Coulomb language: 'shear stress on the failure plane equals cohesion plus normal stress times the tangent of the friction angle'.
- For triaxial test problems, always identify σ₁ = σ₃ + deviator stress before applying any formula — this single step prevents the most common arithmetic error.
- In diagram-based questions, label axes (τ vs σ or σ'), draw the failure envelope line, mark the Mohr circle, and indicate the failure point — each labeled element typically earns a separate mark.
- When discussing drainage conditions, explicitly state 'short-term undrained (UU), φ = 0, strength = cᵤ' or 'long-term drained (CD), use c', φ'' — examiners expect explicit identification, not implied context.
- For UC test questions, always write cᵤ = qᵤ/2 explicitly — students who write only the final numerical value without the formula lose the method mark.
Previous chapter
Consolidation and Settlement
Next chapter
Lateral Earth Pressure and Retaining Structures
Ready to practise for the CELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target CELE exam date.