NLE Psychiatric Disorders — Personality, Somatic, and Eating DisordersSummary
Personality, Somatic, and Eating Disorders is one of the highest-yield Psychiatric Disorders topics for the NLE. Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Nursing has included questions from this chapter in every recent NLE 2026 cycle, so understanding the core ideas and common traps is essential for improving your mock score. This summary walks through what Personality, Somatic, and Eating Disorders is about, the big concepts, the formulas that matter, and how NLE frames questions on this topic.
Exam context
On the NLE 2026, the Psychiatric Disorders subtest carries a "Core" weight in Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Nursing's pattern. Personality, Somatic, and Eating Disorders lands at position 4th out of 7 in the standard review order. Target score is 75% weighted average with no sub-test below 60%, and roughly 50 items come from Psychiatric Disorders on a typical NLE paper.
Personality, Somatic, and Eating Disorders - Summary
This chapter addresses three interconnected groups of psychiatric disorders commonly tested on the Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination: personality disorders, somatic symptom and related disorders, and eating disorders. These conditions are characterized by maladaptive patterns affecting relationships, body perception, and behavioral control. As a nursing professional operating under the Philippine Mental Health Act (Republic Act No. 11036) and aligned with Republic Act 9173 (Nursing Act of the Philippines), you must understand the clinical presentation, nursing diagnoses, and evidence-based interventions for these complex conditions. Personality disorders represent enduring patterns of thinking and behavior that deviate significantly from cultural norms, typically beginning in adolescence or early adulthood. Somatic symptom disorders involve physical complaints or health preoccupation that are real to the client but lack proportionate medical explanation. Eating disorders—anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa—carry the highest mortality rate among all psychiatric illnesses and demand vigilant medical monitoring, particularly for life-threatening complications such as refeeding syndrome. Understanding these disorders equips you to provide holistic, compassionate, and clinically competent care within the Philippine healthcare delivery context, whether in tertiary hospitals, community mental health facilities, or primary care settings.
Key Concepts
A personality disorder is an enduring, pervasive, and inflexible pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture, begins by adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to clinically significant distress or functional impairment. Unlike acute psychiatric episodes, these patterns are deeply ingrained and the client often has limited insight into how their behavior affects others. The etiology involves complex interactions among genetic predisposition, temperament, early attachment relationships, trauma, and learned maladaptive coping strategies. Neurobiologically, research suggests altered neurotransmitter activity (particularly serotonin and dopamine dysregulation) and structural brain differences in regions associated with emotion regulation and impulse control.
Concept
Personality Disorders—Definition and Etiology
Importance
Essential for recognizing that personality disorders are NOT simply 'bad behavior' but represent deep-seated patterns requiring specialized, consistent therapeutic approaches. Critical for the NLE as it forms the foundation for understanding cluster characteristics and appropriate nursing interventions. Nurses must avoid judgment and maintain therapeutic presence while implementing firm, consistent boundaries.
Cluster A includes three personality disorders: (1) Paranoid personality disorder—characterized by pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others' motives, interpreting benign events as threatening, reluctance to confide in others, and bearing grudges; (2) Schizoid personality disorder—marked by detachment from social relationships, restricted emotional expression, indifference to praise or criticism, and a strong preference for solitude, with individuals appearing cold and aloof; and (3) Schizotypal personality disorder—featuring social discomfort and anxiety in social situations, cognitive-perceptual distortions (odd beliefs, magical thinking, ideas of reference), eccentric appearance or behavior, and limited close relationships. These individuals often appear strange or peculiar to others and may have transient psychotic-like symptoms under stress. They typically do NOT seek treatment voluntarily and may only present when legal or family pressures mandate evaluation.
Concept
Cluster A Personality Disorders—'Odd or Eccentric'
Importance
High-yield NLE content requiring differentiation between each disorder and distinction from psychotic disorders (especially schizoid vs. autism spectrum and schizotypal vs. brief psychotic disorder). Nursing approach differs critically: these clients require HONEST, CONSISTENT, and NON-INTRUSIVE care; nurses must respect their need for distance while gently encouraging engagement. Understanding their perception of threat or peculiarity helps nurses avoid triggering paranoid reactions and aids in building a minimal but safe therapeutic alliance necessary for treatment adherence.
Cluster B comprises four personality disorders characterized by dramatic, emotional, or unpredictable presentation: (1) BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER (BPD)—the most clinically significant for nursing and NLE purposes—marked by instability in relationships (intense oscillation between idealization and devaluation; 'splitting'), unstable self-image, impulsive and harmful behaviors (substance abuse, binge eating, reckless driving), affective instability (rapid mood shifts), chronic feelings of emptiness, intense fear of abandonment (real or imagined), and recurrent self-harm or suicidal behavior; (2) Antisocial personality disorder—characterized by disregard for and violation of others' rights, deceitfulness and manipulation, impulsivity, irritability, aggression, reckless disregard for safety, consistent irresponsibility (legal/financial/occupational), and markedly diminished remorse; (3) Histrionic personality disorder—excessive emotionality, attention-seeking behavior, suggestibility, provocative behavior, and interpersonal relationships viewed as more intimate than they are; and (4) Narcissistic personality disorder—grandiosity, excessive need for admiration, preoccupation with fantasies of unlimited success or power, belief in being special or unique, interpersonally exploitative, lack of empathy, and envy of others. Of these, BPD and antisocial PD present the greatest nursing challenges and risks.
Concept
Cluster B Personality Disorders—'Dramatic, Emotional, or Erratic'
Importance
CRITICAL for NLE examination—Cluster B disorders appear frequently in case scenarios involving suicidal behavior, crisis intervention, and therapeutic boundary issues. Borderline PD requires a unified team approach with clear communication to prevent 'splitting' (where the client manipulates staff by telling different providers different stories, creating conflict). Antisocial PD demands firm accountability without punitive stance. The nursing care differs fundamentally from Cluster A: Cluster B clients NEED limits, structure, and clear consequences, whereas Cluster A clients need privacy and minimal intrusion. Understand that clients with BPD are in genuine distress and suicidal behavior is a crisis requiring immediate safety measures; clients with antisocial PD are at lower suicide risk but at high risk for violating others' rights and manipulating the healthcare system. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT)—combining cognitive-behavioral techniques with mindfulness and acceptance—is the gold standard for BPD.
Cluster C includes three personality disorders centered on anxiety and fearful cognitions: (1) Avoidant personality disorder—characterized by social inhibition, feelings of inadequacy and inferiority, hypersensitivity to rejection and criticism, reluctance to take interpersonal risks, restricted social circle due to fear, and physical avoidance of activities they fear; (2) Dependent personality disorder—excessive need to be taken care of, submissive and clinging behaviors, difficulty making everyday decisions without reassurance, willingness to tolerate mistreatment to maintain relationships, and fear of abandonment or being left alone; and (3) Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD)—DISTINCT from OCD—characterized by preoccupation with orderliness, perfectionism, and control at the expense of flexibility and efficiency, difficulty delegating tasks, overdevotedness to productivity/tasks at the expense of relationships, reluctance to discard worn-out objects, rigidity in thinking and ethics, and restricted emotional expression. Clients with Cluster C disorders often present with comorbid anxiety or depressive disorders and are more likely to seek treatment voluntarily because they recognize their distress.
Concept
Cluster C Personality Disorders—'Anxious or Fearful'
Importance
Moderate NLE frequency but important for differential diagnosis (especially OCPD vs. OCD). Nursing approach emphasizes encouraging INDEPENDENT DECISION-MAKING and ASSERTIVENESS, providing support WITHOUT fostering dependence, and setting gradual, realistic goals. For avoidant PD, gradual exposure and validation of feelings help build confidence. For dependent PD, resist the urge to make decisions for the client; instead, guide them toward autonomous choices. For OCPD, respect their need for order and control while gently introducing flexibility. These clients respond well to supportive therapy and often have better prognoses than Cluster A or B disorders.
Across all personality disorder clusters, effective nursing care rests on several core principles: (1) CONSISTENCY—all team members (nurses, physicians, therapists, social workers) must follow the same treatment plan and reinforce the same limits to prevent manipulation and splitting; (2) CLEAR BOUNDARIES—limits must be stated explicitly, explained rationally, and enforced consistently without anger or judgment; (3) STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT—predictable routines reduce anxiety and provide security; (4) AVOIDING RESCUE FANTASIES—nurses must not attempt to 'cure' the disorder or become the special provider who 'truly understands' the client; (5) HOLDING CLIENTS ACCOUNTABLE—without being punitive—for their behavior and its consequences; (6) VALIDATION OF FEELINGS WHILE REDIRECTING BEHAVIOR—acknowledging that the client's emotions are real while setting limits on acting-out; and (7) DOCUMENTATION AND TEAM COMMUNICATION—detailed charting about what happened, nursing response, and client outcome ensures continuity and prevents the client from receiving contradictory messages. For BPD specifically, the approach also includes SAFETY MONITORING (frequent observation, removal of harmful objects, suicide risk assessment), DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY (or similar skills training), and EMOTION REGULATION/DISTRESS TOLERANCE coaching.
Concept
Nursing Interventions for Personality Disorders—General Principles
Importance
FUNDAMENTAL for NLE success—understanding these principles separates competent psychiatric nursing from flawed practice. The NLE tests your ability to maintain professional boundaries while remaining compassionate, to recognize manipulation without shaming the client, and to work as part of a unified team. This is also aligned with RA 9173 (Nursing Act), which mandates that nurses provide care with respect for human dignity and within the scope of competent, ethical practice, and RA 11036 (Mental Health Act), which emphasizes humane, dignity-preserving treatment and protects clients from abuse and discrimination.
Somatic symptom and related disorders form a group where physical symptoms or health concerns dominate the clinical picture, but the symptoms are NOT intentionally produced and are not fully explained by a medical condition. The key distinction from malingering is that the client is NOT consciously faking; the symptoms are REAL to them. The pathophysiology involves complex mind-body interactions: chronic stress and unresolved emotions trigger or amplify physical sensations; learned associations (e.g., a pain that once followed anxiety now triggers anxiety whenever it recurs, creating a cycle); and heightened bodily awareness (hypervigilance to internal sensations). Brain imaging in some somatic disorders shows altered neural processing of pain and interoception (awareness of internal body states). These disorders often develop after significant life stressors, losses, or trauma. Unlike factitious disorder, there is NO conscious deception; unlike malingering, there is NO pursuit of external reward (money, time off work, legal advantage).
Concept
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders—Definition and Pathophysiology
Importance
Essential for NLE because these disorders are common in primary care and general hospital settings where nurses first encounter them. The distinction from malingering and factitious disorder is frequently tested. Critical nursing principle: VALIDATE THAT THE SYMPTOMS ARE REAL while AVOIDING COLLUSION with excessive health anxiety or sick-role reinforcement. Many nurses make the error of treating somatic complaints as 'not real' or dismissing the client as 'just anxious,' which damages the therapeutic relationship and increases health anxiety. Accurate assessment prevents unnecessary testing and reassures the client that their concerns are heard.
Somatic symptom disorder is characterized by one or more distressing physical symptoms that are prominent and persistent (lasting at least 6 months), accompanied by EXCESSIVE thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to the symptoms. The client devotes disproportionate time and energy to health concerns, constantly researching symptoms, checking their body, visiting multiple physicians (doctor-shopping), or avoiding situations they fear will trigger symptoms. The physical complaints may be specific and localized (chest pain, headache, joint pain) or diffuse (fatigue, multiple body aches). Unlike illness anxiety disorder, clients with SSD have noticeable somatic symptoms; however, the DEGREE of concern is excessive relative to the medical findings. For example, a client with mild reflux may become preoccupied with fears of cancer, undergo extensive investigations, and modify their life significantly. The distress and impairment come not just from the symptom itself but from the client's response to it.
Concept
Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD)
Importance
High-yield NLE topic—commonly appears in clinical vignettes. Assessment must rule out genuine medical causes (thyroid disease, autoimmune conditions, early-stage cancer, etc.) because somatic symptom disorder does NOT exclude the possibility of concurrent medical illness. The nursing approach emphasizes: (1) THOROUGH INITIAL ASSESSMENT to rule out medical causes; (2) ACKNOWLEDGMENT that symptoms are real and distressing; (3) AVOIDING UNNECESSARY TESTING or reinforcing health anxiety through excessive reassurance; and (4) REDIRECTING to healthy coping (exercise, stress management, meaningful activities). Establishing ONE consistent primary care provider reduces fragmented care and repeated testing.
Illness anxiety disorder is characterized by preoccupation with having or acquiring a serious illness, with MINIMAL OR NO somatic symptoms (or only mild symptoms). The client experiences HIGH HEALTH ANXIETY and repeatedly checks their body for signs of illness, seeks reassurance from healthcare providers, or excessively researches diseases online. Unlike somatic symptom disorder, there is no prominent pain or fatigue; instead, the client might have a slightly elevated heart rate or a minor cough and become convinced they have a serious condition. The preoccupation persists despite medical evaluation and reassurance that no serious illness is present. Often, reassurance provides only temporary relief (hours to days) before anxiety resurges. High internet usage and 'medical student syndrome' (reading medical information and applying it to oneself) are risk factors.
Concept
Illness Anxiety Disorder (Formerly Hypochondriasis)
Importance
Differentiation from SSD and from medical anxiety in genuinely ill clients is critical for NLE success. The distinguishing feature is the ABSENCE OF SIGNIFICANT SOMATIC SYMPTOMS; health anxiety dominates. Nursing care avoids excessive reassurance (which reinforces the anxiety cycle) while remaining empathetic. Teach reality-testing: 'You have had these worries for 3 months and despite tests, no serious illness has been found. What does that tell you?' Encourage limit-setting on health-related behaviors (e.g., no more than one doctor visit per month, limited online medical research).
Conversion disorder is characterized by neurologic symptoms—such as paralysis, blindness, seizures, aphonia (inability to speak), or numbness—that are INCONSISTENT WITH RECOGNIZED DISEASE and do not follow anatomical pathways. For example, a client might experience 'paralysis' of one leg with intact reflexes and strength when tested indirectly (e.g., strong leg movements in bed), which contradicts true neurological disease. The neurologic examination findings are inconsistent or change with testing. Neuroimaging and electroencephalography are normal. The symptoms usually develop AFTER a significant psychosocial stressor. A striking feature is that clients may display surprising LACK OF CONCERN about what would typically be disabling symptoms—called 'la belle indifférence' (beautiful indifference)—though not all clients show this. The symptoms are NOT intentionally produced (unlike factitious disorder); they are an unconscious expression of psychological conflict or trauma.
Concept
Conversion Disorder (Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder)
Importance
Moderate NLE frequency, often appearing in differential diagnosis questions. The key point is that conversion symptoms are REAL neurologic symptoms (not malingering) but caused by psychological, not medical, pathology. The phrase 'la belle indifférence' is frequently tested. Assessment includes neurologic testing to document inconsistencies and imaging to rule out organic disease. Nursing care involves: (1) TAKING THE SYMPTOMS SERIOUSLY and providing standard care (e.g., safe positioning if paralyzed, visual compensation if blind); (2) NOT TELLING THE CLIENT 'it's all in your head' (this damages trust); (3) GENTLY EXPLORING the connection between the symptom onset and life stressors; and (4) AVOIDING COLLUSION—neither reinforcing disability through excessive concern nor dismissing the symptom as 'not real.' Supportive psychotherapy addressing underlying trauma often leads to symptom resolution.
Factitious disorder is characterized by the DELIBERATE FALSIFICATION or INDUCTION of symptoms to ASSUME THE SICK ROLE—despite the absence of obvious external incentives (money, time off, legal advantage). Unlike malingering, where the deception is for clear external gain, clients with factitious disorder deceive for the internal reward of being cared for and the identity of 'patient.' They may inject infected material to cause infection, claim false symptoms, alter laboratory results, or manipulate healthcare encounters. Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another (formerly Munchausen syndrome by proxy) involves falsifying or inducing symptoms in another person (typically a child or dependent adult) to gain care and attention—constituting abuse. Clients with factitious disorder often have a history of early abuse, loss, or abandonment, and the sick role becomes an unconscious way to secure attention and belonging.
Concept
Factitious Disorder
Importance
Lower frequency on NLE but important for ethical and legal practice. The distinction from somatic symptom disorders (unintentional) and malingering (external incentive) is essential. Nurses must maintain a non-judgmental stance while documenting all observed behaviors objectively. Suspected factitious disorder or Munchausen by proxy must be reported to appropriate authorities (social work, administration, or child protective services in the case of abuse). Care emphasizes maintaining the therapeutic relationship while setting boundaries and not supporting the deceptive behavior. In Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another, child or dependent protection is paramount, aligned with RA 11036's emphasis on protection from abuse.
Eating disorders are severe disturbances in eating behavior and related thoughts and emotions, centered on food intake, body shape, and weight. The two primary types are anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa; binge eating disorder is also recognized. These disorders are NOT about vanity or desire to look good; they involve deep issues of control, self-worth, identity, and coping with distress. Epidemiology shows peak onset in adolescence and young adulthood (ages 13–25), with higher prevalence in females, though incidence in males is rising (approximately 10–25% of cases). Risk factors include perfectionism, low self-esteem, family history, cultural emphasis on thinness, history of trauma, and other psychiatric comorbidities (depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance use). Eating disorders have the HIGHEST MORTALITY RATE OF ANY PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS—roughly 5–15% lifetime mortality depending on severity and comorbidities, with death resulting from medical complications (cardiac arrhythmia, electrolyte imbalance, infection from purging) or suicide. Early intervention and comprehensive medical-psychiatric management significantly improve outcomes.
Concept
Eating Disorders—Overview and Epidemiology
Importance
HIGH-YIELD, CRITICAL NLE CONTENT. The statistic about highest mortality among psychiatric illnesses is frequently tested. Nurses must recognize the medical seriousness and respond with appropriate urgency. All eating disorder clients require medical evaluation and monitoring; this is NOT a purely psychiatric condition. Understanding the psychological drivers (control, perfectionism, distorted self-perception, coping with trauma) helps nurses approach with empathy rather than judgment. The Philippine healthcare context emphasizes family-centered and community-based care; involving families in treatment planning and education is essential per RA 11036.
Anorexia nervosa is characterized by THREE KEY FEATURES: (1) Restriction of energy intake leading to SIGNIFICANTLY LOW BODY WEIGHT (typically BMI < 17.5, or below 85% of expected weight for age/height); (2) INTENSE FEAR OF GAINING WEIGHT even while underweight, driven by deep-seated body image distortion; and (3) DISTORTED BODY IMAGE—clients perceive themselves as overweight or fat despite being objectively underweight or even skeletal. Subtypes include: RESTRICTING TYPE (weight loss through dieting and exercise alone) and BINGE-EATING/PURGING TYPE (weight loss through binge eating followed by purging via vomiting or laxative misuse). Clients are often perfectionistic, high-achieving, and controlling. CLINICAL PRESENTATION includes extreme thinness, preoccupation with food and calorie counting, excessive exercise, wearing loose clothing to hide weight loss, social withdrawal, and denying the seriousness of low weight. MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS reflect SEVERE STARVATION: Amenorrhea or irregular menses (from low estrogen due to malnutrition)—a hallmark finding; Bradycardia and hypotension (cardiac adaptation to reduced metabolic demands); Hypothermia (low core body temperature); Dry skin, hair loss, and LANUGO (fine, downy body hair—a primitive reactivation of fetal hair); Electrolyte imbalances (hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia) leading to cardiac arrhythmias; Osteoporosis and bone density loss (calcium/vitamin D depletion and estrogen deficiency); Dehydration; Constipation and gastrointestinal dysmotility; Cognitive impairment and poor concentration (brain energy deficit); Delayed gastric emptying (refeeding risk factor). LIFE-THREATENING COMPLICATIONS: Sudden cardiac death from electrolyte disturbances or cardiac atrophy; Aspiration pneumonia; Multi-organ failure from severe malnutrition; Suicide (approximately 20% of anorexia deaths are from suicide).
Concept
Anorexia Nervosa—Clinical Presentation and Medical Complications
Importance
CRITICAL, HIGH-YIELD NLE CONTENT. Nurses must recognize anorexia as a MEDICAL EMERGENCY requiring immediate nutritional and electrolyte assessment. The hallmark findings (amenorrhea, lanugo, bradycardia, hypotension, hypothermia) are frequently tested in NLE scenarios. Understanding why clients deny the severity of their condition (related to distorted body image and secondary psychological benefits of control) helps nurses avoid confrontation while maintaining safety. The distinction between restricting and binge-eating/purging types affects monitoring priorities (the latter has more electrolyte complications from vomiting). Clients with anorexia nervosa present higher suicidality risk than bulimia; safety assessment is paramount. Medical stabilization PRECEDES psychological treatment; a client who is severely malnourished cannot engage in therapy.
Bulimia nervosa is characterized by TWO DEFINING FEATURES: (1) RECURRENT BINGE EATING (rapid consumption of a large amount of food in a short time, accompanied by a sense of loss of control); and (2) RECURRENT COMPENSATORY BEHAVIORS to prevent weight gain—self-induced vomiting (the most common), misuse of laxatives or diuretics, fasting for extended periods, or excessive exercise. Unlike anorexia, clients with bulimia typically maintain NORMAL WEIGHT or are SLIGHTLY OVERWEIGHT—making the disorder less visually obvious and sometimes delayed in diagnosis. Clients report a loss of control during binges (unable to stop eating) followed by shame and guilt, leading to compensatory purging. The cycle of binge-purge may occur multiple times daily. CLINICAL PRESENTATION includes: visits to the bathroom immediately after meals (to purge), denial of binge eating, evidence of hidden food wrappers, excessive concern about body shape and weight (but less extreme body image distortion than anorexia), and impulsivity in other areas (substance abuse, risky sexual behavior). Unlike anorexia restricters, clients with bulimia often maintain a more normal social facade. MEDICAL COMPLICATIONS (largely from repeated purging): ELECTROLYTE IMBALANCES, especially HYPOKALEMIA (low potassium) and METABOLIC ALKALOSIS (from loss of stomach acid during vomiting)—these are life-threatening as potassium is essential for cardiac function; Dental ENAMEL EROSION and DENTAL CARIES (from stomach acid exposure); RUSSELL'S SIGN (calluses or scarring on the knuckles from teeth scraping during self-induced vomiting—a pathognomonic sign); Parotid gland enlargement (swelling of salivary glands from vomiting); Esophagitis and potential esophageal tears/rupture (rare but life-threatening); Gastric rupture (rare, from large binge eating); CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS from electrolyte loss (can cause sudden cardiac death); Dehydration; Gastrointestinal dysmotility and constipation. Bulimia is also associated with depression, anxiety, and PERSONALITY DISORDERS (particularly borderline traits).
Concept
Bulimia Nervosa—Clinical Presentation and Medical Complications
Importance
CRITICAL NLE CONTENT. The key differentiator from anorexia is the NORMAL OR SLIGHTLY ELEVATED WEIGHT, which can delay diagnosis. Russell's sign and dental erosion are pathognomonic findings frequently tested. The HYPOKALEMIA and METABOLIC ALKALOSIS from repeated vomiting are life-threatening and require urgent monitoring. Unlike anorexia, suicide risk in bulimia is primarily related to comorbid depression rather than starvation-induced cognitive dysfunction. Medical complications can be severe despite preserved weight; nurses must NOT assume that 'normal weight' means 'healthy.' The focus on purging (rather than restriction) affects nursing interventions: observation during and after meals to prevent vomiting is crucial. The shame and secrecy surrounding bulimia require a non-judgmental, matter-of-fact nursing approach to build trust.
Refeeding syndrome is a POTENTIALLY FATAL complication occurring when nutrition is reintroduced TOO RAPIDLY to a severely malnourished client (most relevant in anorexia nervosa but also seen in starvation from other causes). PATHOPHYSIOLOGY: During prolonged starvation, the body shifts to a catabolic (breakdown) state, relying on fat and protein for energy. When feeding resumes, the body suddenly switches to an ANABOLIC (building) state. Insulin surges as carbohydrate intake increases, driving ELECTROLYTES—particularly PHOSPHATE (the hallmark), POTASSIUM, and MAGNESIUM—INTO CELLS for ATP production and anabolic processes. This causes PROFOUND HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA (low blood phosphate), HYPOKALEMIA, and HYPOMAGNESEMIA. CLINICAL PRESENTATION typically emerges within 3–7 days of initiating feeding: Weakness and fatigue (from electrolyte shifts); Cardiac arrhythmias and palpitations (from potassium and phosphate deficiency); Confusion, delirium, or altered consciousness; Respiratory muscle weakness and potential respiratory failure; Seizures (from electrolyte abnormalities); Pulmonary edema and heart failure (from fluid shifts); Hypoglycemia (rebound insulin secretion). COMPLICATIONS: Sudden cardiac death; Rhabdomyolysis (muscle breakdown from phosphate deficiency, worsening renal function); Hemolytic anemia; Infection susceptibility (immune dysfunction). PREVENTION: (1) Reintroduce nutrition SLOWLY—initial calories typically 1000–1200 kcal/day for severely malnourished clients, advancing by 200–300 kcal every 3–5 days per protocol; (2) Monitor ELECTROLYTES closely—baseline phosphate, potassium, magnesium, and calcium; repeat labs every 1–3 days initially, then daily once refeeding begins; (3) Phosphate supplementation is OFTEN NEEDED and is more important than many clinicians realize (IV or oral replacement per protocol); (4) Monitor cardiac rhythm continuously if severe electrolyte depletion; (5) Daily weights (same scale, time, and clothing) to detect fluid shifts; (6) Fluid balance monitoring (intake/output) as fluid shifts can precipitate pulmonary or peripheral edema; (7) Monitor for signs of heart failure or respiratory compromise.
Concept
Refeeding Syndrome—Pathophysiology, Presentation, and Prevention
Importance
CRITICAL, HIGH-YIELD NLE CONTENT—refeeding syndrome appears frequently in case scenarios involving eating disorder management. The HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA is the hallmark finding that distinguishes refeeding from simple malnutrition. Understanding the mechanism (switch from catabolic to anabolic state driving electrolytes into cells) helps nurses remember what to monitor and why slow reintroduction is essential. This is a common exam question: 'A 20-year-old female with anorexia nervosa, BMI 15, is admitted for refeeding. Which electrolyte abnormality is MOST concerning?' Answer: Hypophosphatemia, with hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia close behind. Many newly graduated nurses make the error of advancing calories too quickly to 'catch up' nutritionally; this is DANGEROUS and causes refeeding syndrome. The principle of SLOW, GRADUAL reintroduction is non-negotiable. Nurses in acute care and eating disorder units must be vigilant about this complication.
Nursing management of eating disorders follows the NURSING PROCESS and MASLOW'S HIERARCHY, with PHYSIOLOGIC SAFETY as the priority due to life-threatening complications. ASSESSMENT: (1) THOROUGH MEDICAL HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAM—vital signs (orthostatic blood pressure, heart rate regularity), weight and height (calculate BMI and compare to healthy range), skin (turgor, temperature, lanugo), hair (texture, loss), teeth (erosion, caries), abdomen (distension, tenderness, bowel sounds), cardiovascular exam (murmurs, S3 gallop, arrhythmias), and neurologic exam (mental status, reflexes). (2) LABORATORY ASSESSMENT—complete metabolic panel (electrolytes, glucose, kidney function, liver function), phosphate, magnesium, calcium, complete blood count (anemia?), albumin/prealbumin (protein status), electrocardiogram (arrhythmia risk), and consider imaging (chest X-ray for aspiration risk, bone density scan for osteoporosis). (3) PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT—body image distortion (ask 'How do you see your body?' and compare to objective appearance), thoughts about food and body (obsessive content?), binge-purge frequency and methods, exercise patterns, suicidal ideation, comorbid depression/anxiety, and insight into illness severity. NURSING DIAGNOSES (NANDA-I aligned with Maslow): Priority 1—Imbalanced Nutrition: Less Than Body Requirements (physiologic need); Risk for Injury related to electrolyte imbalance and refeeding syndrome; Risk for Cardiac Dysrhythmia; Risk for Suicide or Self-Harm (for purging, restrictive behavior). Priority 2—Disturbed Body Image; Chronic Low Self-Esteem. Priority 3—Social Isolation; Ineffective Coping. INTERVENTIONS—STRUCTURED EATING PLAN: (1) ESTABLISH A DEFINED MEAL PLAN with specific calorie intake per protocol (typically 2000–3000 kcal/day for anorexia, individualized based on medical stability and baseline metabolic rate). (2) OBSERVATION DURING AND AFTER MEALS—Assign nursing staff to sit with the client during meals and FOR APPROXIMATELY ONE HOUR AFTERWARD to prevent food hiding, discarding, or (in bulimia) purging. For bulimia, accompany to the bathroom or make bathroom inaccessible during the observation window. Document food consumed. (3) WEIGH CLIENT REGULARLY—same scale, time (usually early morning after voiding), and clothing (hospital gown) for consistency; compare to baseline and expected weight goal; note rapid weight changes (may indicate fluid shifts or hidden loss). (4) MONITOR INTAKE AND OUTPUT—strict I&O to detect fluid imbalances; watch for signs of dehydration or fluid overload (edema, dyspnea). (5) ELECTROLYTE MONITORING—Labs per protocol (typically every 1–3 days initially); report abnormalities immediately; phosphate, potassium, magnesium replacement per provider orders. (6) PREVENT REFEEDING SYNDROME—Caloric advancement SLOW and GRADUAL; educate the medical team if calorie increases are too rapid. (7) NUTRITION EDUCATION—Teach normal eating patterns, balanced nutrition, and the difference between hunger cues and emotional eating (without overwhelming the client early in treatment). BEHAVIORAL APPROACH: (1) USE A MATTER-OF-FACT, NON-PUNITIVE TONE—present the eating plan as medical necessity, not punishment. Avoid power struggles and excessive focus on food itself, which can inadvertently reinforce obsession. (2) AVOID PRAISE FOR EATING—Instead, acknowledge completion neutrally ('You consumed 80% of your meal plan'). Excessive praise can trigger guilt or resistance. (3) SET CLEAR CONSEQUENCES AND REWARDS—Per facility protocol, behavioral contracts may outline privileges contingent on adherence (e.g., access to visitors or outings if nutritional goals are met). (4) AVOID COLLUSION—Do NOT hide food for the client, do NOT allow clients to weigh themselves multiple times daily, do NOT engage in lengthy discussions about calories or body appearance. (5) SUPPORT WITHOUT ENABLING—Validate the client's distress ('I know eating is difficult and scary for you') while firmly maintaining the treatment plan. PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT: (1) BUILD SELF-ESTEEM through highlighting STRENGTHS, not appearance; reinforce identity beyond food/body/weight. (2) TEACH EMOTION REGULATION—Help clients identify emotions and develop alternative coping (journaling, art, progressive muscle relaxation) rather than eating/purging. (3) BODY IMAGE WORK—Gentle reality-testing ('What does the scale and tape measure say about your body? How does that compare to what you see in the mirror?') and exposure to avoided situations (mirrors, fitting clothes) with support. (4) INVOLVE FAMILY—Family therapy, psychoeducation, and skill-building are evidence-based interventions, especially for adolescents; educate family on the seriousness, the need for patience, and warning signs of relapse. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY: (1) FLUOXETINE (SSRI) is FDA-approved for bulimia nervosa and helps reduce binge-purge frequency and comorbid depression; used adjunctively with behavioral treatment. (2) BUPROPION (Wellbutrin) is CONTRAINDICATED in eating disorders because it LOWERS THE SEIZURE THRESHOLD, and clients with eating disorders (especially bulimia and those with electrolyte imbalances) are at increased seizure risk. (3) Antipsychotics may be used off-label for severe body image distortion or comorbid psychotic features but are not first-line. (4) No medication replaces behavioral and nutritional intervention. MONITORING FOR RELAPSE: Signs include preoccupation with food/weight, exercise increases, social withdrawal, and weight loss or vomiting resumption; rapid intervention prevents hospitalization.
Concept
Nursing Management of Eating Disorders—Assessment and Intervention
Importance
EXTENSIVE, HIGH-YIELD NLE CONTENT covering nursing assessment, diagnosis, intervention, and pharmacology. The principle that MEDICAL STABILIZATION PRECEDES PSYCHOLOGICAL WORK is critical—a severely malnourished client in electrolyte crisis cannot engage in therapy. The observation protocol (during and 1 hour after meals) is frequently tested and is non-negotiable for safety. Understanding WHY each intervention is done (e.g., observation prevents purging, slow caloric advancement prevents refeeding syndrome, consistency prevents manipulation) demonstrates deeper clinical reasoning. The distinction between fluoxetine (helpful in bulimia) and bupropion (contraindicated) is a classic NLE pharmacology question. Nurses must approach eating disorder clients with EMPATHY, recognizing that the behavior represents a way of coping with intolerable emotions and distorted self-perception, not a moral failure or attention-seeking.
Nursing management of somatic symptom disorders emphasizes a different approach than eating disorders, as medical emergencies are less likely but the risk of unnecessary testing and reinforcement of sick role is high. ASSESSMENT: (1) COMPLETE MEDICAL HISTORY AND PHYSICAL—Rule out organic causes of symptoms; take the complaint seriously ('Tell me about this pain. When did it start? What makes it better or worse? What do you think is causing it?'). (2) IDENTIFY THE SYMPTOM PATTERN—Symptoms often worsen with stress or emotional triggers; clients may report multiple, diffuse symptoms or focus intensely on one symptom. (3) ASSESS HEALTH ANXIETY LEVEL—How much time does the client spend worried about illness? Do they doctor-shop or research symptoms excessively online? (4) PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT—Comorbid depression, anxiety, or trauma; coping mechanisms; secondary gains (attention, avoidance of responsibilities, excuse for poor performance). (5) PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESSORS—Recent losses, conflicts, changes; history of abuse or neglect (especially in childhood). NURSING DIAGNOSES (NANDA-I): Acute or Chronic Pain (or other somatic symptom) related to psychological factors; Anxiety related to health concerns; Ineffective Coping related to emotional distress; Risk for Complicated Grieving or Traumatic Stress (if recent loss or trauma precipitated onset). INTERVENTIONS: (1) RULE OUT MEDICAL CAUSES—Perform thorough initial assessment; coordinate with providers to complete necessary investigations (labs, imaging) ONCE; avoid repeatedly testing the same complaint, which reinforces health anxiety. Establish in the chart that organic causes have been ruled out, reducing staff tendency to investigate repeatedly. (2) ACKNOWLEDGE SYMPTOMS WITHOUT COLLUDING—'I believe you are experiencing pain/fatigue. Your symptom is real to you.' AVOID saying 'It's all in your head' or 'There's nothing wrong with you,' which invalidates and damages trust. Also AVOID excessive reassurance ('Don't worry, you definitely don't have cancer'), which provides temporary relief but then anxiety resurges because the reassurance is sought repeatedly. (3) FOCUS ON FUNCTION, NOT SYMPTOMS—Instead of 'How is your pain?' ask 'What activities did you do today?' or 'Are you able to go for a walk?' Redirect attention from the symptom to capability and activity. (4) ESTABLISH ONE CONSISTENT PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER—Reduces fragmented care, repeated tests, and the client's ability to doctor-shop or play providers against one another. A continuity relationship allows gradual exploration of stressors. (5) SCHEDULE REGULAR, BRIEF VISITS—For example, every Tuesday at 2 PM, a 15-minute appointment with the nurse or provider, regardless of symptoms. This removes the incentive to exaggerate symptoms to 'earn' an appointment and provides consistent, predictable contact. (6) TEACH THE MIND-BODY CONNECTION—Over time, gently link symptom increases to stressful events: 'I notice your stomach pain flares when you're worried about work. Does that match your experience?' Avoid forcing this connection early; allow the client to discover it. (7) REDIRECT TO COPING AND STRESS MANAGEMENT—Teach relaxation techniques (progressive muscle relaxation, deep breathing), exercise (even gentle walking), sleep hygiene, and meaningful activities. Help the client identify and address life stressors (relationship conflict, occupational stress, grief). (8) LIMIT SECONDARY GAINS—While sympathetic, avoid reinforcing the sick role. For example, if the client avoids all work/social activities due to symptoms, gently encourage incremental participation: 'I think a short walk might actually help your energy. How about we start with 5 minutes today?' (9) INVOLVE FAMILY EDUCATION—Teach family NOT to excessively focus on the symptom, NOT to reinforce disability ('No, you're too sick to attend that event'), and NOT to engage in repetitive reassurance-seeking. Encourage normal expectations and emotional support. (10) PSYCHOTHERAPY—Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based approaches are evidence-based; referral to psychology/psychiatry is essential for underlying depression, anxiety, trauma, or unresolved grief. AVOID PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY as first-line (though SSRIs for comorbid depression/anxiety are appropriate). The goal is RESTORATION OF FUNCTION, not symptom elimination, and recognition that emotions and life experiences are valid and addressable.
Concept
Nursing Management of Somatic Symptom Disorders—Assessment and Intervention
Importance
MODERATE-TO-HIGH NLE FREQUENCY. The most critical error nurses make is dismissing somatic complaints as 'not real' or refusing to take the client seriously. This violates the therapeutic relationship and may delay genuine medical diagnosis. The equally problematic error is COLLUDING—ordering excessive tests, providing repeated reassurance, or validating health anxiety as appropriate. Striking the BALANCE between validation and redirection is an art and requires self-awareness. Understanding that somatic symptoms often arise from REAL psychological pain (unresolved trauma, grief, depression) helps nurses respond with compassion while setting appropriate boundaries. This disorder is common in community and primary care settings where nurses may be the first assessor; proper approach prevents unnecessary emergency department visits and builds the client's capacity to manage distress without healthcare dependence.
Important Points
- Personality disorders are ENDURING, INFLEXIBLE patterns of behavior beginning by adolescence and causing DISTRESS OR IMPAIRMENT; the client often lacks INSIGHT into the problematic pattern.
- CLUSTER A (Odd/Eccentric): Paranoid, Schizoid, Schizotypal—nursing approach is HONEST, CONSISTENT, NON-INTRUSIVE; respect distance while gently encouraging engagement.
- CLUSTER B (Dramatic/Erratic): Borderline, Antisocial, Histrionic, Narcissistic—requires FIRM LIMITS, CONSISTENT TEAM APPROACH, and CLEAR COMMUNICATION to prevent SPLITTING (staff disagreement exploited by client).
- BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER features SPLITTING (all-good vs. all-bad thinking), FEAR OF ABANDONMENT, UNSTABLE RELATIONSHIPS, IDENTITY DISTURBANCE, SELF-HARM, and CHRONIC EMPTINESS—prioritize SAFETY and use DIALECTICAL BEHAVIOR THERAPY.
- CLUSTER C (Anxious/Fearful): Avoidant, Dependent, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality—nursing approach encourages INDEPENDENT DECISION-MAKING, gradual goal-setting, and support WITHOUT DEPENDENCE.
- Somatic symptom and related disorders involve symptoms that are REAL TO THE CLIENT and NOT INTENTIONALLY PRODUCED—distinguish from MALINGERING (conscious deception for external gain) and FACTITIOUS DISORDER (deliberate falsification for sick role).
- SOMATIC SYMPTOM DISORDER: Multiple distressing physical symptoms with EXCESSIVE thoughts/behaviors/time devoted to health—RULE OUT MEDICAL CAUSES and AVOID EXCESSIVE REASSURANCE.
- ILLNESS ANXIETY DISORDER: High health anxiety with MINIMAL OR NO somatic symptoms—differs from SSD by absence of prominent physical symptoms.
- CONVERSION DISORDER: Neurologic symptoms inconsistent with disease (e.g., paralysis that works when patient isn't watching); may show LA BELLE INDIFFÉRENCE (surprising lack of concern)—symptoms are REAL but caused by psychological, not organic, pathology.
- FACTITIOUS DISORDER: DELIBERATE falsification of symptoms to assume sick role—report suspected cases to appropriate authorities; NOT malingering (which has external incentive).
- EATING DISORDERS have the HIGHEST MORTALITY RATE of any psychiatric illness (5–15% lifetime); treatment requires MEDICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC approaches.
- ANOREXIA NERVOSA: RESTRICTION of intake → SIGNIFICANTLY LOW BODY WEIGHT, INTENSE FEAR OF WEIGHT GAIN, DISTORTED BODY IMAGE (sees self as fat when underweight); HALLMARK FINDINGS: AMENORRHEA, BRADYCARDIA, HYPOTENSION, HYPOTHERMIA, LANUGO, ELECTROLYTE IMBALANCE.
- BULIMIA NERVOSA: BINGE-PURGE cycle; usually NORMAL OR SLIGHTLY OVERWEIGHT (unlike anorexia); COMPLICATION: HYPOKALEMIA and METABOLIC ALKALOSIS from vomiting; RUSSELL'S SIGN (knuckle scarring) is pathognomonic.
- REFEEDING SYNDROME: Rapid nutrition reintroduction → HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA (hallmark), HYPOKALEMIA, HYPOMAGNESEMIA, fluid shifts → cardiac arrhythmias, respiratory failure, death—PREVENT by slow, gradual caloric advancement and FREQUENT ELECTROLYTE MONITORING.
- Eating disorder NURSING CARE: MEDICAL STABILIZATION FIRST (electrolytes, cardiac monitoring, refeeding prevention); STRUCTURED EATING PLAN; OBSERVATION during and 1 HOUR AFTER MEALS (prevent purging); SLOW CALORIC ADVANCEMENT; CONSISTENT PRIMARY PROVIDER; MATTER-OF-FACT, NON-PUNITIVE approach; avoid power struggles; FAMILY INVOLVEMENT.
- FLUOXETINE is approved for BULIMIA; BUPROPION is CONTRAINDICATED (lowers seizure threshold in purging clients).
- Nursing management across all three disorder groups emphasizes CONSISTENCY, CLEAR COMMUNICATION, AVOIDING MANIPULATION, and APPROPRIATE BOUNDARIES while maintaining THERAPEUTIC PRESENCE and COMPASSION.
- All psychiatric nursing care operates under the PHILIPPINE MENTAL HEALTH ACT (RA 11036)—ensuring CLIENT RIGHTS, HUMANE TREATMENT, COMMUNITY-BASED CARE, and PROTECTION FROM ABUSE; nurses also follow RA 9173 (Nursing Act) for ETHICAL, COMPETENT, DIGNIFIED PRACTICE.
Chapter Objectives
- Define and distinguish among the three clusters of personality disorders (A: odd/eccentric; B: dramatic/erratic; C: anxious/fearful) and apply appropriate nursing interventions for each
- Analyze the key features of borderline personality disorder, including splitting and self-harm risk, and implement a unified team approach with consistent limit-setting and safety prioritization
- Differentiate among somatic symptom disorder, illness anxiety disorder, conversion disorder, and factitious disorder; explain why ruling out medical causes is essential and how to avoid reinforcing secondary gain
- Recognize the clinical presentation, medical complications, and nursing care priorities for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, including electrolyte monitoring and prevention of relapse
- Explain refeeding syndrome—its pathophysiology, hallmark findings (hypophosphatemia), and prevention through gradual nutritional reintroduction and careful electrolyte monitoring
- Apply the nursing process (assessment, diagnosis, planning, intervention, evaluation) using NANDA-I nursing diagnoses aligned with Maslow's hierarchy of needs for clients with personality, somatic, and eating disorders
- Demonstrate knowledge of psychopharmacology for these disorders, including appropriate and contraindicated medications, within the Philippine healthcare context
- Integrate understanding of the Philippine Mental Health Act (RA 11036) and RA 9173 to ensure client rights, humane treatment, and community-based care approaches
Concept Relationships
Primary Concept
Personality Disorders
Related Concepts
- Cluster A–Cluster B–Cluster C classification system
- Splitting (especially in Borderline PD)
- Manipulation and boundary-setting
- Nursing diagnosis: Risk for Self-Harm (Borderline)
- Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) as gold-standard treatment
- Team approach and consistent communication
- Limited insight and ego-syntonic symptoms (client sees behavior as acceptable)
Relationship Explanation
The three clusters represent a spectrum of personality patterns, each requiring different nursing approaches. Cluster B disorders, especially borderline PD, demand the most intensive boundary management and safety monitoring. The common thread across all clusters is the pervasiveness of the pattern and limited insight; clients don't typically see their behavior as problematic. Understanding the specific cluster guides the nurse's intervention strategy: Cluster A clients need space and honesty; Cluster B clients need firm, consistent limits; Cluster C clients need encouragement toward autonomy.
Primary Concept
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
Related Concepts
- Physical symptoms that are REAL but not fully medical
- Mind-body connection and stress-symptom link
- Distinction from malingering and factitious disorder
- Secondary gain and sick role reinforcement
- Validation without collusion
- Limiting healthcare-seeking behavior while maintaining therapeutic relationship
Relationship Explanation
Somatic symptom disorders exist on a spectrum from prominent physical symptoms with health anxiety (SSD) to minimal symptoms with high anxiety (illness anxiety disorder) to neurologic symptoms from psychological causes (conversion disorder). All share the critical feature that symptoms are NOT intentionally produced, distinguishing them from factitious disorder (deliberate deception). Nursing care walks a tightrope: validate the real distress while avoiding reinforcement of the sick role through excessive testing, reassurance, or attention to the symptom. The goal is redirecting energy from health preoccupation to functional living and addressing underlying emotions.
Primary Concept
Eating Disorders
Related Concepts
- Anorexia nervosa vs. Bulimia nervosa (restrictive vs. purging patterns)
- Medical complications: electrolyte imbalances, cardiac arrhythmias, osteoporosis
- Refeeding syndrome as a critical complication requiring slow nutritional reintroduction
- Body image distortion and perfectionism as psychological drivers
- Observation protocols and structured eating plans
- Family involvement and psychoeducation
- Highest mortality among psychiatric illnesses
Relationship Explanation
Anorexia and bulimia both involve maladaptive control over eating and body image but present differently: anorexia shows extreme low weight with restrictive patterns, while bulimia maintains near-normal weight via binge-purge cycles. The complications differ accordingly: anorexia involves starvation effects (amenorrhea, lanugo, bradycardia), while bulimia involves purging-related effects (hypokalemia, dental erosion, Russell's sign). However, BOTH can lead to refeeding syndrome if nutrition is reintroduced too rapidly—a potentially fatal complication requiring slow, monitored feeding. Nursing care for both emphasizes structured eating, observation to prevent purging, electrolyte monitoring, and addressing the psychological underpinnings (perfectionism, low self-worth, trauma coping).
Primary Concept
Safety Priorities Across Disorder Groups
Related Concepts
- Borderline PD: Self-harm and suicidal behavior (highest suicide risk)
- Eating Disorders: Refeeding syndrome, electrolyte crisis, cardiac dysrhythmias (highest overall mortality)
- Somatic Disorders: Delayed medical diagnosis if organic causes dismissed
- Factitious Disorder: Child abuse in Munchausen by proxy variant
Relationship Explanation
While distinct disorders, personality, somatic, and eating disorders all require vigilant safety assessment. Borderline PD carries acute suicide/self-harm risk managed through intensive observation and consistent limits. Eating disorders carry both acute (refeeding, electrolyte crisis, cardiac complications) and chronic (malnutrition, osteoporosis, infection) risks, demanding medical monitoring. Somatic disorders risk safety through diagnostic delays if symptoms are dismissed; safety lies in thorough initial medical evaluation. Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another is abuse and requires reporting. Across all, the nurse's primary Maslow-level priority is PHYSIOLOGIC SAFETY, followed by management of medical complications, before psychological interventions can proceed.
Practical Applications
Nle Relevance
High-frequency scenario on NLE—tests understanding of splitting, manipulation, safety prioritization, and team communication. Common wrong answer: providing extra attention to prevent suicidal behavior (this reinforces the behavior). Correct approach: consistent, firm care with safety monitoring but without special privileges.
Disorder Group
Personality Disorders—Cluster B (Borderline PD)
Clinical Scenario
A 22-year-old female admitted to a psychiatric unit after a suicide attempt (superficial arm lacerations following perceived abandonment by her boyfriend). She is manipulative, splitting staff ('Dr. Ahmed is the only one who understands me; the nurses are all mean'), alternating between idealization and devaluation. She demands constant attention, threatens to harm herself if not seen immediately, and is sexually inappropriate with male staff.
Nursing Assessment
Risk for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior (acute); Disturbed Personal Identity; Ineffective Coping; Risk for Manipulation/Splitting of treatment team.
Nursing Intervention
(1) SAFETY: 1:1 observation or frequent observation per protocol; remove harmful objects; suicide precautions; assess for triggers of self-harm. (2) SET CLEAR, FIRM LIMITS: 'I will not discuss Dr. Ahmed being better than me. All staff are trained and care about your safety. These are the rules for interaction.' Use neutral tone; do not defend or argue. (3) UNIFIED TEAM APPROACH: Hold daily team meetings to communicate plan, ensure consistent messaging, and prevent splitting. Explicitly discuss how to handle demanding behavior: 'When she asks for special privileges, the answer from all staff is no.' (4) VALIDATE FEELINGS WITHOUT VALIDATING BEHAVIOR: 'I understand you feel abandoned and it's painful. Harming yourself is not safe, and we cannot allow it.' (5) TEACH DISTRESS TOLERANCE: 'When you feel the urge to cut, use this ice cube on your skin' or 'Call for a staff member and we'll go for a walk.' (6) REDIRECT INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR: Matter-of-fact address of sexual comments without shame: 'That comment isn't appropriate in a professional setting. Let's focus on your treatment plan.' (7) INVOLVE IN DBT or skills training: emotion regulation, distress tolerance, mindfulness, interpersonal effectiveness. (8) FAMILY EDUCATION: Educate family on the disorder, the need for consistency, how to set limits without rejection, and recognizing that splitting is a symptom, not a personal attack.
Nle Relevance
Moderate frequency—tests understanding of how to encourage autonomy without abandoning the client. The error is either becoming 'the perfect nurse' who makes decisions for the client (reinforcing dependence) or being coldly dismissive of the anxiety (damaging trust). The balance is warm but firm support toward independence.
Disorder Group
Personality Disorders—Cluster C (Dependent PD)
Clinical Scenario
A 35-year-old male admitted for evaluation following repeated anxiety and panic attacks. He is dependent on his mother (lives with her, she manages his finances and medical care), cannot make decisions without her reassurance, and is extremely fearful of abandonment. He asks the nurse 'What should I do?' repeatedly for minor decisions (what to wear, when to shower).
Nursing Assessment
Anxiety related to decision-making; Ineffective Coping; Chronic Low Self-Esteem; Difficulty with autonomy and independence.
Nursing Intervention
(1) ENCOURAGE INDEPENDENT DECISION-MAKING: When asked 'What should I wear?' respond, 'What do you prefer? What is your choice?' Gently redirect to his preferences. (2) AFFIRM ABILITY: 'You have made good decisions before. You are capable.' (3) SET REALISTIC, GRADUAL GOALS: Start with small decisions (daily schedule, meal preferences) before larger ones (occupational or living decisions). (4) AVOID CREATING DEPENDENCE ON NURSING: Limit reassurance-seeking; do not become the 'helpful staff member he prefers'; rotate staff to prevent attachment. (5) INVOLVE FAMILY EDUCATION: Teach mother the importance of encouraging her son's autonomy, not rescuing him from decisions or anxiety. (6) THERAPY REFERRAL: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to address core fears of abandonment and inadequacy, and to build assertiveness. (7) GRADUAL EXPOSURE: Encourage participation in activities, social groups, or occupational training to build confidence and social skills. (8) VALIDATE EMOTIONS: 'Your anxiety is real and uncomfortable. Making your own decisions is scary. But you have the capability to do this, and I'll support you.'
Nle Relevance
High frequency in primary care/general nursing scenarios. The critical error is DISMISSING the complaints ('It's all in your head') or COLLUDING by ordering excessive tests. The nurse must walk the line between validation and redirection. This scenario tests empathy, boundary-setting, and understanding of the therapeutic relationship.
Disorder Group
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders—Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD)
Clinical Scenario
A 45-year-old female presents to the clinic with multiple complaints: chronic fatigue, diffuse muscle pain, headaches, and 'stomach problems.' She has visited numerous specialists over 2 years, undergone extensive testing (CT scans, blood work, endoscopy—all normal), and is convinced she has an undiagnosed serious illness. She spends hours daily researching symptoms online, frequently calls the clinic requesting additional tests, and has rearranged her life around symptoms (quit her job, stopped social activities). She is frustrated that doctors say 'nothing is wrong.'
Nursing Assessment
Somatic Symptom Disorder with excessive health anxiety; Rule out: thyroid disease, autoimmune disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome (via appropriate testing, not excessive testing); Anxiety; Ineffective Coping; Social Isolation; Chronic Low Self-Esteem.
Nursing Intervention
(1) VALIDATE SYMPTOMS: 'I believe you are experiencing fatigue and pain. Your symptoms are real.' (2) AVOID EXCESSIVE REASSURANCE: Do NOT say 'You definitely don't have cancer' (provides false sense of security and anxiety resurges). Instead: 'You have had thorough testing by specialists. The tests have not shown serious illness. What does that tell you?' (Reality-testing; let her draw conclusions.) (3) ESTABLISH MEDICAL CLOSURE: Review all prior testing; document in chart that organic causes have been ruled out; agree with her and providers that FURTHER TESTING FOR THE SAME COMPLAINTS IS COMPLETE. Limit future appointments tied to symptom exacerbation. (4) SCHEDULE REGULAR, BRIEF VISITS: Every Tuesday at 2 PM, 15-minute appointment, regardless of symptoms. This removes incentive to exaggerate symptoms to 'earn' an appointment. (5) REDIRECT TO FUNCTION: 'What activities would you like to resume? Let's start with one small activity each week, even if you have symptoms.' (6) TEACH MIND-BODY CONNECTION: 'I've noticed your stomach pain increased last week when you were stressed about your daughter. Does that match your experience?' Help her identify stress triggers. (7) STRESS MANAGEMENT AND COPING: Teach relaxation (progressive muscle relaxation, deep breathing), exercise (even gentle yoga), journaling, and meaningful activities. (8) INVESTIGATE UNDERLYING ISSUES: Explore losses, conflicts, trauma, depression. Refer to psychology for individual therapy (CBT is evidence-based for SSD). (9) FAMILY EDUCATION: 'Please don't focus excessively on her symptoms or provide repeated reassurance. Encourage normal activity participation. Show you care about her, not just her health.' (10) MEDICATION: If comorbid depression/anxiety, consider SSRI; monitor compliance.
Nle Relevance
Moderate frequency—tests understanding that conversion symptoms are REAL but PSYCHOLOGICAL in origin, and how to avoid dismissing the patient while gently addressing underlying trauma/stressors. The phrase 'la belle indifférence' is frequently tested as a distinguishing feature.
Disorder Group
Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders—Conversion Disorder
Clinical Scenario
A 28-year-old male presents to the emergency department with acute paralysis of both legs following a heated argument with his wife about his job loss. Neurologic examination shows intact strength when tested indirectly (he can move his legs in bed) but reports inability to walk; reflexes are normal; neuroimaging is normal. The patient is strangely calm about being unable to walk and shows la belle indifférence. He denies intentionally faking the symptoms.
Nursing Assessment
Conversion Disorder (Functional Neurological Symptom Disorder) related to psychosocial stressor (job loss, marital conflict); Rule out: spinal cord injury, Guillain-Barré syndrome, multiple sclerosis (via neurologic testing and imaging); Mobility impairment; Ineffective Coping.
Nursing Intervention
(1) PROVIDE STANDARD CARE: Treat the paralysis as real (because it is real neurologically, just not from organic disease). Ensure safety (positioning, fall prevention, skin care). Do NOT tell the patient 'You're faking' or 'It's all in your head.' (2) GENTLE EXPLORATION: Over time, explore the stressor: 'I notice your paralysis began after the argument with your wife about your job. What was that like for you?' Help the patient make the connection without forcing it. (3) AVOID EXCESSIVE FOCUS ON THE SYMPTOM: Do NOT repeatedly test strength or ask about paralysis. Matter-of-fact care prevents reinforcement. (4) MOBILIZATION: Gentle physical therapy and occupational therapy to aid mobility; movement in bed, wheelchair transfers, gradual standing/walking as tolerated. Many patients with conversion disorder improve with supportive therapy and resolution of underlying stressors. (5) STRESS MANAGEMENT: Help address the job loss and marital stress. Referral to social work (job training resources, financial counseling) and couple's therapy or individual therapy. (6) PSYCHOEDUCATION: 'Your body is telling us something important about the stress you're experiencing. These symptoms can improve as we address what's causing them.' (7) ANTIDEPRESSANT THERAPY: If depression is present (common with job loss), SSRI may help.
Nle Relevance
CRITICAL, HIGH-YIELD NLE CONTENT. Refeeding syndrome is frequently tested. The nurse must understand WHY slow advancement matters (switch from catabolic to anabolic state), what the hallmark finding is (hypophosphatemia), and what interventions prevent it (slow calories, frequent monitoring). Questions often ask: 'Which electrolyte is MOST concerning in refeeding syndrome?' Answer: Phosphate (hypophosphatemia). 'How should calories be advanced?' Answer: Slowly and gradually. A common error is assuming that because the client is malnourished, rapid feeding is necessary—this is DANGEROUS. Another error is failing to observe after meals, which allows covert exercise or food hiding that undermines weight restoration.
Disorder Group
Eating Disorders—Anorexia Nervosa with Refeeding Risk
Clinical Scenario
A 19-year-old female admitted to an inpatient eating disorder unit with anorexia nervosa (BMI 15.2). Physical exam shows: HR 48, BP 92/60, amenorrhea for 8 months, lanugo on arms, dental erosion. Labs: K+ 2.9 (normal 3.5–5.0), PO4 2.1 (normal 2.5–4.5), Mg 1.6 (normal 1.7–2.2), albumin 2.8 (normal 3.5–5.0). She is medically stabilized and nutritional refeeding is planned to begin at 1200 kcal/day, advancing by 300 kcal every 3 days.
Nursing Assessment
Imbalanced Nutrition: Less Than Body Requirements; Risk for Injury (electrolyte imbalance, refeeding syndrome); Risk for Cardiac Dysrhythmia; Disturbed Body Image; Chronic Low Self-Esteem; Deficient Knowledge regarding nutrition and health risks.
Nursing Intervention
(1) BASELINE LABS AND MONITORING: Ensure baseline electrolytes (including phosphate, magnesium, calcium), glucose, ECG, and continuous cardiac monitoring if severe electrolyte depletion. Repeat labs every 1–3 days initially, then daily once refeeding begins. (2) ELECTROLYTE REPLACEMENT: Administer replacement per protocol: Potassium supplementation (oral or IV per severity); Phosphate supplementation (often overlooked but crucial—hypophosphatemia is the hallmark of refeeding syndrome); Magnesium supplementation. (3) PREVENT REFEEDING SYNDROME: Reintroduce calories SLOWLY and GRADUALLY per the protocol (1200 kcal/day initially, advancing by 300 kcal every 3–5 days). Educate the dietary team and medical team that RAPID ADVANCEMENT IS DANGEROUS. Do NOT skip steps to 'catch up' nutritionally. (4) FLUID BALANCE: Monitor intake/output; watch for signs of fluid overload (edema, dyspnea, weight gain > 0.5 kg/day suggesting fluid retention rather than tissue gain); monitor for dehydration. (5) DAILY WEIGHTS: Same time (early morning), same scale, same clothing (hospital gown); document trend; alert provider if weight loss continues or abnormal gain (fluid shifts). (6) STRUCTURED EATING PLAN: Assign specific meals/snacks; client consumes in dining area with nursing staff present. (7) OBSERVATION: During meals and FOR APPROXIMATELY 1 HOUR AFTER MEALS (critical for preventing food hiding or covert exercise to offset meal intake). If vomiting is a concern, accompany to bathroom or make it inaccessible. Document exact amount consumed. (8) VITAL SIGNS: Monitor HR, BP (including orthostatic), temperature regularly; report abnormalities (further electrolyte depletion if worsening bradycardia). (9) PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT: Address body image distortion gently. Avoid excessive discussion of calories/weight. Redirect to function and feelings. Teach emotion regulation and healthy coping. (10) FAMILY INVOLVEMENT: Educate on the medical seriousness, the slow refeeding process (not an emergency to gain weight quickly), and signs of relapse. (11) PHARMACOTHERAPY: Fluoxetine may be considered adjunctively for comorbid depression; NOT used alone and NOT for anorexia treatment specifically. Bupropion is CONTRAINDICATED. (12) WATCH FOR REFEEDING SYNDROME SIGNS: Weakness, confusion, dyspnea, palpitations, seizures—immediate intervention (slow feeding, IV electrolyte replacement, intensive monitoring).
Nle Relevance
High-frequency NLE scenario. The key differentiator from anorexia is normal weight; Russell's sign and dental erosion are pathognomonic. The testing priority is HYPOKALEMIA and METABOLIC ALKALOSIS from vomiting. The observation protocol post-meals is critical and is frequently tested: 'How long should the nurse observe a client with bulimia nervosa after meals?' Answer: Approximately 1 hour. A common error is assuming that because the client is 'not underweight,' the disorder is less serious—this is false; purging-related complications are severe and life-threatening.
Disorder Group
Eating Disorders—Bulimia Nervosa with Purging Complications
Clinical Scenario
A 21-year-old female admitted to a psychiatric unit following depression and suicidal ideation. Collateral history from roommate reveals binge-purge behavior (eating entire pints of ice cream, boxes of crackers, then vomiting). Patient is reluctant to disclose. Physical exam: normal weight (BMI 22), dental caries and enamel erosion on posterior teeth, RUSSELL'S SIGN (scarring on knuckles), parotid swelling. Labs: K+ 2.8, HCO3- 33 (elevated; metabolic alkalosis), Mg 1.6.
Nursing Assessment
Bulimia Nervosa with purging subtype; Risk for Injury (electrolyte imbalance, cardiac dysrhythmia); Depression with suicidal ideation; Disturbed Body Image; Ineffective Coping.
Nursing Intervention
(1) SAFETY: Assess suicide risk; implement precautions as indicated; address depression (SSRI such as fluoxetine is appropriate). (2) MEDICAL STABILIZATION: Labs (electrolytes, ECG); monitor for cardiac dysrhythmias. Potassium replacement per severity. (3) STRUCTURED EATING PLAN: Three meals + snacks daily; specific times; not negotiable. (4) OBSERVATION PROTOCOL: During meals and FOR 1 HOUR AFTER MEALS. Make bathroom inaccessible during this window (lock if necessary; staff accompanies if client needs bathroom access). This is NON-NEGOTIABLE for stopping purging. Document amount consumed and client response. (5) FLUID AND ELECTROLYTE MONITORING: Daily labs initially for potassium and magnesium; monitor urine output (dehydration from purging); watch for signs of hypokalemia (weakness, muscle cramps, palpitations). (6) NORMALIZE EATING PATTERNS: Avoid restriction (which triggers binge-purge cycles); regular, adequate meals reduce urgency to binge. Educate the client: 'Binge-purge often occurs when we restrict. Regular eating helps break the cycle.' (7) ADDRESS PURGING URGE: When the urge arises, redirect: 'I know you want to purge. Let's go for a walk instead' or 'Use your distress tolerance skills—ice cube, cold water on face, progressive muscle relaxation.' (8) EXPLORE EMOTIONAL TRIGGERS: Often binge-purge is triggered by emotion (stress, loneliness, shame, anger). Help identify triggers: 'What were you feeling before the binge?' Teach alternative coping: journaling, calling a friend, exercise, art. (9) BODY IMAGE WORK: Do NOT label client as 'overweight' or use weight as motivation ('If you purge, you'll gain weight'). Instead, focus on function and health: 'Purging damages your teeth and your heart. Let's work on stopping because you deserve health.' (10) PSYCHOTHERAPY: CBT is evidence-based for bulimia; referral to psychology. (11) PHARMACOTHERAPY: Fluoxetine (Prozac) is FDA-approved for bulimia and helps reduce binge-purge frequency and comorbid depression; dose typically 60 mg/day. BUPROPION IS CONTRAINDICATED (lowers seizure threshold). (12) FAMILY EDUCATION: Educate on the seriousness of purging complications (electrolyte crisis, dental damage, esophageal rupture); encourage support but avoid reinforcing eating disorder behaviors.
In summary
Personality, somatic symptom, and eating disorders represent three distinct but conceptually linked groups of psychiatric conditions that are extensively tested on the Philippine Nursing Licensure Examination. Personality disorders are characterized by enduring, inflexible patterns of behavior beginning in adolescence or early adulthood; they are organized into three clusters (A: odd/eccentric; B: dramatic/erratic; C: anxious/fearful), each requiring distinct nursing approaches. Cluster A clients need honesty, consistency, and respect for distance; Cluster B clients—particularly those with borderline personality disorder—require firm, consistent limits, unified team communication to prevent splitting, and vigilant safety monitoring for self-harm and suicidal behavior; Cluster C clients benefit from encouragement toward autonomy and gradual goal-setting. Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) is the evidence-based treatment for borderline personality disorder. Somatic symptom and related disorders involve physical symptoms or health preoccupation that are REAL to the client but NOT intentionally produced and NOT fully explained by medical illness. The critical nursing principle is to validate symptoms without collusion—ruling out organic causes initially, avoiding excessive testing and reassurance (which reinforce the sick role), and redirecting the client toward functional living and addressing underlying emotional distress. Eating disorders—anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa—represent the most medically serious psychiatric illnesses, with the highest mortality rate among all psychiatric disorders. Anorexia is characterized by severe restriction leading to significantly low body weight and distorted body image; bulimia involves binge-purge cycles with maintenance of near-normal weight. Both require comprehensive medical assessment, baseline and frequent electrolyte monitoring, structured eating plans with strict observation during and approximately one hour after meals, and gradual nutritional reintroduction to prevent the life-threatening complication of refeeding syndrome. Refeeding syndrome occurs when nutrition is reintroduced too rapidly, causing a dangerous shift from catabolic to anabolic metabolism with resulting electrolyte shifts—particularly HYPOPHOSPHATEMIA (the hallmark), hypokalemia, and hypomagnesemia—leading to cardiac dysrhythmias, respiratory failure, and death. Prevention requires slow, gradual caloric advancement (typically 1000–1200 kcal/day initially, advancing by 200–300 kcal every 3–5 days) and frequent electrolyte monitoring with replacement as needed. Fluoxetine is appropriate for bulimia; bupropion is contraindicated due to lowering of seizure threshold. Throughout management of all three disorder groups, nurses apply the nursing process using NANDA-I nursing diagnoses, prioritize according to Maslow's hierarchy of needs (physiologic safety first), maintain consistency and clear communication especially in team settings, set appropriate professional boundaries while remaining compassionate, and operate within the framework of the Philippine Mental Health Act (RA 11036) and the Nursing Act (RA 9173), which mandate humane, dignity-preserving, evidence-based care and protection of client rights. Success in NLE preparation and clinical practice requires not only factual knowledge but also the clinical reasoning to recognize these disorders, prioritize interventions appropriately, anticipate complications, and implement therapeutic approaches that combine safety, medical vigilance, and psychological support.
Next steps
To consolidate your mastery of this chapter and prepare effectively for the NLE, undertake the following steps: (1) ACTIVE RECALL AND SPACED REPETITION: Using the mind map and flowcharts provided, practice daily recall of the personality disorder clusters, their distinguishing features, and corresponding nursing approaches. Focus on Cluster B (especially borderline PD) as it is highest-yield. (2) CONCEPT MAPPING: Create your own detailed concept maps linking personality disorder features to NANDA-I nursing diagnoses (e.g., Borderline PD → Risk for Self-Harm → Safety measures, observation, limit-setting). Do the same for somatic and eating disorders. (3) CASE SCENARIO PRACTICE: Work through the six practical application scenarios provided (and seek additional scenarios from review books or online NLE prep resources). For each scenario, practice: writing a complete assessment, identifying the disorder, developing nursing diagnoses prioritized per Maslow's hierarchy, planning evidence-based interventions, and anticipating complications and safety priorities. Time yourself to simulate exam conditions. (4) PHARMACOLOGY REVIEW: Create flash cards for key medications: Fluoxetine (indication, side effects, monitoring) for eating disorders; SSRIs for somatic/personality disorder comorbid depression; and CRITICALLY, bupropion contraindication in eating disorders. (5) CLINICAL TERMINOLOGY: Ensure you can define and apply correctly: splitting, idealization and devaluation, la belle indifférence, Russell's sign, lanugo, refeeding syndrome, hypophosphatemia, metabolic alkalosis, DBT, and therapeutic boundary-setting. Teach these terms to a peer to test your understanding. (6) LEGISLATION AND ETHICS: Review the Philippine Mental Health Act (RA 11036) and Nursing Act (RA 9173) to understand: client rights, duty to report abuse (especially in Factitious Disorder Imposed on Another), humane treatment mandates, and the nurse's role in promoting community-based, dignified care. (7) INTEGRATION WITH OTHER TOPICS: Link this chapter to others: How does depression comorbidity change assessment and treatment? How do trauma and grief relate to somatic symptom development? How does substance use interact with eating disorders? Systems thinking strengthens clinical reasoning. (8) TIMED PRACTICE TESTS: Use full-length NLE practice exams (available through official PRC resources or reputable review centers in the Philippines) and identify every question related to personality, somatic, and eating disorders. Review each wrong answer to understand the clinical reasoning. Aim for 80–90% accuracy on these topics before sitting for the actual NLE. (9) PEER TEACHING: Join study groups and teach your peers about these disorders. Explaining concepts aloud strengthens neural pathways and identifies gaps in your understanding. (10) CLINICAL CORRELATION: If possible, observe or care for clients with these disorders in supervised clinical settings (psychiatric units, general hospital psychiatry consults, community mental health clinics). Real-world exposure cements textbook knowledge. (11) REFLECT ON PERSONAL BIASES: These disorders often trigger judgment in healthcare providers. Reflect: How do you feel about clients who self-harm, who doctor-shop, who struggle with eating? Developing awareness of your biases allows you to provide non-judgmental, therapeutic care—a cornerstone of professional nursing. (12) FINAL REVIEW BEFORE NLE: In the week before the exam, review the key points and high-yield features (refeeding syndrome, splitting in borderline PD, observation protocol in eating disorders, lack of insight in personality disorders, validation in somatic disorders). Trust your preparation and approach each question methodically. You are prepared to provide safe, evidence-based, compassionate care to individuals with these complex psychiatric conditions.
Previous chapter
Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders
Next chapter
Substance Use and Addictive Disorders
Ready to practise for the NLE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target NLE exam date.