GELE Adjustment Computations (Least Squares) — Least Squares — Observation EquationsCheat Sheet
Least Squares — Observation Equations cheat sheet — the reference card you wish you had on exam day. Condensed from the full study notes, this is the high-yield core of Least Squares — Observation Equations for GELE Adjustment Computations (Least Squares). Download, print, revise.
Exam context
The Geodetic Engineer Licensure Examination is conducted by Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) — Board of Geodetic Engineering and is scheduled for September 2026. The Adjustment Computations (Least Squares) subtest is marked as "Core" in the official pattern, and Least Squares — Observation Equations appears in position 2nd of 5 in the GELE Adjustment Computations (Least Squares) review rotation. Passing mark: 70% weighted average, no sub-test below 50%. Recent GELE 2026 papers have drawn roughly a meaningful share of questions from this subject.
Least Squares — Observation Equations - Cheat Sheet
Your 30-minute exam companion for observation-equation (parametric) least squares. Covers the core principle, matrix solution, residuals, redundancy, and weighted-mean applications essential for the PRC Licensure Examination.
Sections
Formulas
Formula
Minimize Σ wᵢvᵢ²
Meaning
w = weight; v = residual (computed − observed); sum over all observations
Watch Out
Sign of residual: here v = computed − observed (some texts use observed − computed; be consistent!)
When To Use
Whenever you need to adjust redundant observations; it's the definition of least squares
Section Title
Core Principle & Concept
Important Facts
- Least squares is the rigorous, most-probable method when errors are random and normally distributed.
- Observation form (parametric): each observation is a function of unknown parameters; alternative is condition form (constraint equations).
- For one unknown, least-squares solution IS the weighted mean; don't over-complicate.
- Weights are typically w ∝ 1/σ² (inverse variance); equivalent to weight matrix P = diagonal with pᵢᵢ = 1/σᵢ².
- Redundancy must be positive (n > u) to perform adjustment; n = u gives unique solution but no error check.
Key Definitions
Term
Residual (v)
Example
If computed elevation = 152.40 m, observed = 152.36 m, then v = +0.04 m
Definition
The correction to computed value to match observation; v = Axˆ − ℓ in observation form.
Term
Observation Equation
Example
Three level routes give three equations; each relates observed height to single unknown elevation H
Definition
Linear model ℓ + v = f(xˆ), rearranged to v = Axˆ − ℓ, relating each observed value to unknown parameters.
Term
Redundancy (Degrees of Freedom)
Example
12 observations, 8 unknowns → redundancy = 4; allows adjustment and error detection
Definition
Number of excess observations: redundancy = n − u (observations − unknowns).
Term
Design Matrix (A)
Example
For one unknown observed n times, A is a column vector of 1's; for two unknowns, A has two columns
Definition
Matrix of partial derivatives ∂f/∂xⱼ; each row is one observation, each column one unknown parameter.
Diagrams To Know
- Flow: Observation → Linearization → Design Matrix (A) → Normal Equations → Solution xˆ → Residuals v
- Matrix relationship: v = Axˆ − ℓ (parametric form)
- Weight-matrix structure: P = diag(1/σ₁², 1/σ₂², …, 1/σₙ²)
Formulas
Formula
v = Axˆ − ℓ
Meaning
v = residuals (n×1); A = design matrix (n×u); xˆ = parameter corrections (u×1); ℓ = observed − computed (n×1)
Watch Out
Sign: some texts define ℓ = computed − observed (opposite sign). Check problem setup. Here ℓ = observed − computed.
When To Use
Starting point for all observation-equation least-squares problems; linearized form of observations
Formula
(AᵀPA)xˆ = AᵀPℓ
Meaning
Normal equations (u×u system); P = weight matrix (n×n, diagonal); solution gives parameter corrections
Watch Out
Matrix (AᵀPA) must be non-singular (full rank); verify by checking if all unknowns appear in at least one observation
When To Use
Solve for xˆ directly (board exam) when you don't have matrix inverse formulas; rearrange to isolate xˆ
Formula
xˆ = (AᵀPA)⁻¹AᵀPℓ
Meaning
Explicit least-squares solution for unknown corrections; (AᵀPA)⁻¹ is variance-covariance-like matrix
Watch Out
Matrix inversion is computational; exam usually gives either the inverse or the normal equations to solve. Check matrix dimensions!
When To Use
Direct formula solution (if inverse given or calculable); preferred in computer/matrix calculators
Section Title
Matrix Formulation & Solution
Important Facts
- Weighted least squares uses P (weight matrix); unweighted is special case where all weights = 1 (same precision).
- The matrix (AᵀPA) is symmetric and typically positive-definite if problem is well-posed.
- Solution xˆ contains corrections; final parameters = a priori values + xˆ.
- Residuals v are computed after solution via v = Axˆ − ℓ; they sum (nearly) to zero in least-squares sense.
- For independent observations (no correlations), P is diagonal; otherwise, P is full symmetric matrix.
Key Definitions
Term
Normal Equations
Example
For one unknown, reduces to Σ wᵢℓᵢ = (Σ wᵢ)xˆ, i.e., xˆ = Σ wᵢℓᵢ / Σ wᵢ (weighted mean)
Definition
The system (AᵀPA)xˆ = AᵀPℓ; derived by minimizing Σ wᵢvᵢ² and setting ∂/∂xˆ = 0.
Term
Weight Matrix (P)
Example
Three routes with σ = 10, 5, 20 mm → weights 1/100, 1/25, 1/400 (inverse variance rule)
Definition
Diagonal matrix with diagonal entries pᵢᵢ = wᵢ = 1/σᵢ²; encodes precision of each observation.
Term
Reference Variance (σ₀²)
Example
σ̂₀² ≈ 1 (in normalized units) means weighting is realistic; σ̂₀² >> 1 flags blunders or poor weights
Definition
Estimate of observation variance; σ̂₀² = (vᵀPv) / (n − u); checks if residuals fit assumed precisions.
Diagrams To Know
- Matrix structure: A (n×u), xˆ (u×1), ℓ (n×1), v (n×1), P (n×n diagonal)
- Multiplication sequence: AᵀPA produces (u×u) system; AᵀPℓ produces (u×1) right-hand side
- Solution path: Observations → A, ℓ, P → Normal Equations → xˆ → v → σ̂₀²
Formulas
Formula
σ̂₀² = (vᵀPv) / (n − u)
Meaning
v = residuals; P = weight matrix; n = observations; u = unknowns; denominator = redundancy
Watch Out
Must compute v first via v = Axˆ − ℓ. If redundancy ≤ 0, can't compute (no unique adjustment exists).
When To Use
After computing residuals, to assess quality of fit; check if weighting was realistic
Formula
Redundancy = n − u
Meaning
Excess observations available for error checking; must be ≥ 1 for adjustment
Watch Out
If n = u, solution is unique but unadjustable (no redundancy, no error estimate). If n < u, problem has infinite solutions.
When To Use
First thing: count observations and unknowns; if redundancy ≤ 0, problem is under-determined
Section Title
Reference Variance & Redundancy Check
Important Facts
- Reference variance σ̂₀² is the squared standard error of unit weight (per weight unit); often called post-fit variance.
- If σ̂₀² is much > 1, investigate outliers, blunders, or systematic errors in observations.
- If σ̂₀² is much < 1, weights may be over-pessimistic (observations better than assumed) or model is over-fitting.
- Redundancy needed ≥ 1; typical geodetic surveys aim for redundancy ≥ 3–5 for robust error detection.
- For network adjustment, σ̂₀² ≈ 1 is ideal; σ̂₀² used to scale cofactor matrix for parameter uncertainties.
Key Definitions
Term
Degrees of Freedom
Example
12 observations, 8 unknowns → 4 degrees of freedom allow chi-squared test on σ̂₀²
Definition
Synonym for redundancy; the number of independent constraints on residuals after solving for unknowns.
Term
Chi-Squared Test (σ̂₀² Check)
Example
σ̂₀² = 0.9 (good); σ̂₀² = 5.2 (suggests blunder or over-optimistic weights)
Definition
Compare σ̂₀² to expected value ~1 (if weights are correct units); large σ̂₀² suggests outliers or poor weighting.
Diagrams To Know
- Decision tree: redundancy ≤ 0? → Cannot adjust. redundancy > 0? → Compute σ̂₀² → Check fit quality
Formulas
Formula
xˆ = Σ(wᵢℓᵢ) / Σwᵢ
Meaning
Weighted mean; wᵢ = weight of observation i; ℓᵢ = observed − computed for observation i
Watch Out
Weights must be consistent (all proportional to 1/σ² or all relative). If one observation has weight = 1, scale all weights accordingly.
When To Use
ONE unknown observed multiple times (most common exam case); quickest, most intuitive solution
Formula
wᵢ = 1/σᵢ² (or proportional)
Meaning
Weight inversely proportional to variance (or squared error); higher precision → higher weight
Watch Out
If σᵢ² is given in different units (e.g., one in mm², another in m²), convert to consistent units first!
When To Use
Assigning weights from measurement uncertainties; standard rule for independent observations
Formula
A = [1, 1, …, 1]ᵀ (column of 1s for single unknown)
Meaning
Design matrix for one unknown observed n times; each observation equation: ℓᵢ + vᵢ = xˆ
Watch Out
If unknown appears with different coefficients in observations (e.g., ℓ₁ + v₁ = 2xˆ), A is not a column of 1s; revert to general solution.
When To Use
Verifying matrix form of single-unknown case; recognize it reduces to weighted mean
Section Title
Single Unknown = Weighted Mean (Exam Gold Standard)
Important Facts
- For one unknown, least-squares always reduces to the weighted mean; no matrix inversion needed.
- Weights proportional to 1/distance (in leveling) or 1/variance (general); normalize so Σwᵢ = some convenient number or leave as ratio.
- Most common exam case: 2–4 observations of same quantity (height, distance, angle) with different precisions.
- Residuals: vᵢ = xˆ − ℓᵢ; sum of weighted residuals Σ wᵢvᵢ = 0 (always true for least-squares).
- Reference variance: σ̂₀² = Σ wᵢvᵢ² / (n − 1) for single unknown (redundancy = n − 1)
Key Definitions
Term
Weighted Mean
Example
Three elevation routes: 152.34 m (weight 0.5), 152.30 m (weight 1.0), 152.36 m (weight 0.25) → weighted mean = 152.32 m
Definition
Average value computed with weights proportional to precision; least-squares solution for single unknown.
Diagrams To Know
- Single-unknown flow: Multiple observations with weights → Compute Σ wᵢℓᵢ and Σ wᵢ → Divide to get xˆ → Compute residuals vᵢ = xˆ − ℓᵢ → Check Σ wᵢvᵢ ≈ 0
Reactions Or Equations
Note
Second form shows xˆ as weighted sum of observations; equivalent to normal equations (AᵀPA)xˆ = AᵀPℓ for A = [1,1,…,1]ᵀ
Equation
xˆ = (Σ wᵢℓᵢ) / (Σ wᵢ) = Σ (wᵢ / Σ wⱼ) · ℓᵢ
Conditions
All observations of same unknown; weights wᵢ proportional to precision (1/σᵢ²)
Section Title
Board-Exam Workflow & Common Pitfalls
Important Facts
- Step 1: Define unknowns (parameters to adjust) and count them (u).
- Step 2: Count observations (n); compute redundancy = n − u.
- Step 3: If one unknown → use weighted mean directly.
- Step 4: If multiple unknowns → set up design matrix A, observation vector ℓ, weight matrix P.
- Step 5: Solve normal equations (AᵀPA)xˆ = AᵀPℓ (by hand or given).
- Step 6: Compute residuals v = Axˆ − ℓ.
- Step 7: Verify Σ wᵢvᵢ ≈ 0 (weighted residuals sum to zero).
- Step 8: Compute reference variance σ̂₀² = (vᵀPv) / (n − u); check fit quality.
- Pitfall: confusing ℓ = observed − computed vs. computed − observed; define at start and stick with it.
- Pitfall: forgetting to normalize weights or mixing weight units; ensure consistency.
Key Definitions
Term
Observation Form (Parametric)
Example
Level network: each sight difference = function of station heights (unknowns); observation equation is linear
Definition
Least-squares method modeling each observation as function of unknown parameters; contrast with condition form (constraints).
Term
Linearization
Example
Distance observation d₀ + Δd = √((ΔE)² + (ΔN)²) is nonlinear; linearize around approximate positions
Definition
Approximation of nonlinear observation function via Taylor series (first-order only); required for observation equations.
Diagrams To Know
- PRC Exam Problem-Solving Checklist: Understand problem → Count n, u → Check redundancy → Set up A, ℓ, P → Solve → Verify → Report
Section Title
Worked Examples (Exam-Style)
Important Facts
- Example 1 (Weighted mean, 1 unknown): 3 level routes to elevation. ℓ₁ = 152.34 m (k₁ = 2 km), ℓ₂ = 152.30 m (k₂ = 1 km), ℓ₃ = 152.36 m (k₃ = 4 km). Weights ∝ 1/k. Solution: w₁ = 0.5, w₂ = 1.0, w₃ = 0.25; Σw = 1.75; xˆ = (0.5·152.34 + 1.0·152.30 + 0.25·152.36)/1.75 = 152.32 m.
- Example 2 (Redundancy check): Network with 12 observations, 8 unknowns. Redundancy = 12 − 8 = 4 degrees of freedom. Adjustment is possible; error detection enabled.
- Example 3 (Reference variance concept): After adjustment, σ̂₀² = 1.3. Interpretation: residuals slightly larger than assumed precisions; possible minor blunder or over-optimistic weights. Check observations #2 and #5.
- Example 4 (Single unknown, 4 observations): Heights h₁ = 100.12 m (σ = 0.05 m), h₂ = 100.08 m (σ = 0.10 m), h₃ = 100.10 m (σ = 0.05 m), h₄ = 100.15 m (σ = 0.20 m). Weights w ∝ 1/σ²: w₁ = 400, w₂ = 100, w₃ = 400, w₄ = 25; Σw = 925. xˆ = (400·100.12 + 100·100.08 + 400·100.10 + 25·100.15)/925 = 100.11 m (approx).
Must Remember
- 1. Least squares minimizes Σ wᵢvᵢ² (weighted sum of squared residuals); observation form is v = Axˆ − ℓ.
- 2. Solution to normal equations: xˆ = (AᵀPA)⁻¹AᵀPℓ; for one unknown, this is the weighted mean.
- 3. One unknown observed n times → xˆ = Σ(wᵢℓᵢ)/Σwᵢ; fastest exam solution.
- 4. Weights: wᵢ ∝ 1/σᵢ² (inverse variance rule); higher precision → higher weight.
- 5. Redundancy = n − u (observations − unknowns); must be > 0 for adjustment; enables error checking.
- 6. Residuals: v = Axˆ − ℓ (computed after solving); check Σ wᵢvᵢ ≈ 0 as verification.
- 7. Reference variance: σ̂₀² = (vᵀPv)/(n−u); near 1.0 = good fit; >> 1.0 = investigate blunders.
- 8. Design matrix A has rows = observations, columns = unknowns; partial derivatives ∂f/∂xⱼ.
- 9. Weight matrix P = diagonal with pᵢᵢ = wᵢ = 1/σᵢ² (for independent observations).
- 10. Before solving: always verify redundancy > 0 (enough observations); define ℓ = observed − computed consistently.
Last Minute Tips
- Tip 1: If problem mentions 'one point observed multiple ways' (multiple leveling routes, GPS fixes, theodolite sightings), it's always a weighted-mean case → use xˆ = Σ(wᵢℓᵢ)/Σwᵢ directly (fastest exam method).
- Tip 2: Sign of ℓ: define once, use consistently. Here ℓ = observed − computed. If confused, check the worked example in your reference and stick with it for the entire problem.
- Tip 3: Weight units must match: if one route is in km and you assign weight 1/distance, scale all weights to same unit or normalize Σwᵢ to a round number (e.g., 1.0 or 10) before dividing.
- Tip 4: Always check redundancy = n − u first. If ≤ 0, stop and state 'problem under-determined' or 'unique solution exists but no adjustment/error estimate'. If > 0, proceed to least-squares.
- Tip 5: After computing xˆ, verify by checking Σ wᵢvᵢ ≈ 0 (should be nearly zero due to normal-equation derivation). Large value = arithmetic error in vᵢ or weights.
Comparison Tables
Rows
Values
- Each observation = f(parameters)
- Constraint between observations
Property
Equation Type
Values
- A = partials of f; n×u
- B = constraint partials; c×n (c = conditions)
Property
Design Matrix
Values
- Observations are primary; unknowns are target
- Constraints are primary; measurements are secondary
Property
When to Use
Values
- Most common for surveying adjustments
- Less common in introductory courses
Property
Exam Focus
Columns
- Aspect
- Observation Form (Parametric)
- Condition Form (Not This Chapter)
Table Title
Observation Form vs. Condition Form (Context Only)
Rows
Values
- w ∝ 1/distance (or 1/sqrt if route)
- 2 km route: w = 0.5; 1 km route: w = 1.0
Property
Leveling by distance
Values
- w ∝ 1/σ² (sigma from instrument spec)
- σ = 5 arcsec: w = 1/25; σ = 10 arcsec: w = 1/100
Property
Angle measurement
Values
- w ∝ 1/σ² (proportional to range × constant)
- σ = 5 mm at 100 m: w = 1/25; σ = 10 mm at 200 m: w = 1/100
Property
Distance by EDM
Values
- w = 1 for all (unweighted case)
- All observations assumed same σ; simple mean
Property
Equal precision
Columns
- Observation Type
- Standard Weight Formula
- Example
Table Title
Weight Assignment Rules (Key Reference)
Rows
Values
- Good fit; weighting is realistic
- Accept solution; report standard errors
Property
0.5–1.5
Values
- Acceptable; minor inconsistencies
- Check for systematic errors; review observations
Property
1.5–3.0
Values
- Poor fit; probable blunders or bad weights
- Investigate outliers; re-measure suspect observations
Property
> 3.0
Values
- Unusually good; weights may be pessimistic
- Verify weights; solution is likely valid but optimistic
Property
< 0.5
Columns
- σ̂₀² Range
- Interpretation
- Action
Table Title
Residual Interpretation (σ̂₀² Values)
Previous chapter
Theory of Errors, Weights and Most Probable Value
Next chapter
Condition Equations and Figure Adjustment
Ready to practise for the GELE 2026?
Super Tutor's AI review plan adapts to your weak areas and builds a weekly practice schedule around your target GELE exam date.